Mishra Daxa G, Vaishnav Smruti Bhalendu, Phatak Ajay Gajanan
Women's Health Unit, KM Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Bhaikaka University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bhaikaka University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
J Midlife Health. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):74-79. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_83_21. Epub 2022 May 2.
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a significant health problem with serious physical, psychological, and social consequences. Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) is proven efficacious in the prevention and management of UI. A lack of trained physiotherapist in rural areas mars the uptake of physiotherapy and therefore innovative mechanisms are required. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the usefulness of home-based physiotherapy in the management of UI.
A total of 49 women, who screened positive for UI from a larger study conducted in 4 randomly selected villages of Charutar region, were included in the study. They were assigned home-based or supervised regimens randomly. All participants received education about UI and its management. A structured PFME schedule was developed. Participants in the supervised group received PFME by a trained physiotherapist, while those in the home-based group received training on exercise. Details of each session were documented through a daily diary in both groups. Revised urinary incontinence scale (RUIS) and incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) were administered at baseline and after 6 months to assess and compare the impact across groups.
Analysis of variance (with comparisons) was employed to compare the effect of physiotherapy across groups. Only 18 (10 supervised and 8 home-based group) out of 49 women participated. Another 10 provided the required data, albeit had not done any exercises. The mean standard deviation of RUIS ( = 0.84) and IIQ-7 ( = 0.55) scores was similar at baseline across the groups. The RUIS ( = 0.01) and IIQ-7 ( = 0.006) improved significantly; however, analysis revealed that both RUIS and IIQ-7 improved significantly only in the supervised group.
Supervised exercise worked better, whereas home-based exercise failed to achieve the desired impact. Identifying barriers in home-based exercise and finding feasible solutions would prove a breakthrough in the management of UI in resource-limited settings.
尿失禁(UI)是一个严重的健康问题,会产生严重的身体、心理和社会后果。盆底肌肉锻炼(PFME)已被证明对预防和管理尿失禁有效。农村地区缺乏训练有素的物理治疗师,这影响了物理治疗的推广,因此需要创新机制。本研究旨在评估家庭物理治疗在尿失禁管理中的作用。
从在查鲁塔尔地区随机选取的4个村庄进行的一项更大规模研究中筛选出49名尿失禁检测呈阳性的女性纳入本研究。她们被随机分配到家庭治疗组或监督治疗组。所有参与者都接受了关于尿失禁及其管理的教育。制定了结构化的盆底肌肉锻炼计划。监督治疗组的参与者由一名训练有素的物理治疗师指导进行盆底肌肉锻炼,而家庭治疗组的参与者接受锻炼培训。两组均通过每日日记记录每次锻炼的详细情况。在基线和6个月后分别使用修订后的尿失禁量表(RUIS)和尿失禁影响问卷(IIQ-7)来评估和比较两组的效果。
采用方差分析(进行比较)来比较各治疗组物理治疗的效果。49名女性中只有18名(10名在监督治疗组,8名在家庭治疗组)参与。另外10名提供了所需数据,但未进行任何锻炼。两组在基线时RUIS(标准差 = 0.84)和IIQ-7(标准差 = 0.55)评分的均值相似。RUIS(P = 0.01)和IIQ-7(P = 0.006)有显著改善;然而,分析显示只有监督治疗组的RUIS和IIQ-7有显著改善。
监督下的锻炼效果更好,而家庭锻炼未能达到预期效果。识别家庭锻炼中的障碍并找到可行的解决方案将成为资源有限地区尿失禁管理的一个突破。