Suppr超能文献

经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)时采用超声引导手指压迫法阻断颈内静脉预防导管尖端位置异常的Meta分析

Prevention of catheter tip malposition with an ultrasound-guided finger-pressure method to block the internal jugular vein during PICC placement: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zheng Yan, Zhou Hua-Jing, Tao Nian, Tian Yun, Qin Shu-Wen, Qin Bi-Yong, Xia Yu

机构信息

Nursing Department, The Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Hubei, Wuhan, China.

Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District, Hubei, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Jun;17(2):289-298. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.115198. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are a type of deep venipuncture, for which the catheter tip malposition rate is high.

AIM

To examine the feasibility of preventing catheter tip malposition during PICC placement using an ultrasound-guided finger-pressure method to block the internal jugular vein.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a tertiary public hospital in Hubei province, China. A total of 600 patients were recruited and randomly allocated to the ultrasound-guided finger compression method (UGFCM) and traditional partial head method (TPHM) group (n = 300/group). Incidence of catheter tip malposition was assessed as the primary outcome of the study. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China-National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Biomedicine Database and performed publication bias and sensitivity analyses on 10 extracted studies.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall incidence of catheter tip malposition was significantly lower in the UGFCM and TPHM group (1.67% vs. 10.3%) and particularly the incidence of malposition in the internal jugular vein (1% vs. 9%). In the meta-analysis of 10 eligible studies, with 1263 cases using the UGFCM method while 1261 adopted the TPHM method, the results showed that the incidence of catheter tip malposition was significantly lower in the group using the UGFCM method (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.11-0.27, p < 0.01), which is in line with the results of our RCT study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study may add valuable evidence on adopting the finger-pressure method for blocking neck veins to reduce the incidence of catheter tip malposition, particularly in the internal jugular vein.

摘要

引言

经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)是一种深静脉穿刺方式,其导管尖端位置不当率较高。

目的

探讨采用超声引导手指压迫法阻断颈内静脉预防PICC置管过程中导管尖端位置不当的可行性。

材料与方法

我们在中国湖北省一家三级公立医院进行了一项双盲随机对照试验(RCT)。共招募600例患者,随机分为超声引导手指压迫法(UGFCM)组和传统偏头法(TPHM)组(每组n = 300)。导管尖端位置不当的发生率作为本研究的主要结局进行评估。进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网和中国生物医学数据库,并对10项提取的研究进行了发表偏倚和敏感性分析。

结果

两组患者的基线人口统计学和临床特征无显著差异(p > 0.05)。UGFCM组和TPHM组导管尖端位置不当的总体发生率显著较低(1.67%对10.3%),尤其是颈内静脉位置不当的发生率(1%对9%)。在对10项符合条件的研究进行的荟萃分析中,1263例使用UGFCM方法,1261例采用TPHM方法,结果显示使用UGFCM方法的组导管尖端位置不当的发生率显著较低(OR = 0.17,95%CI:0.11 - 0.27,p < 0.01),这与我们的RCT研究结果一致。

结论

本研究可能为采用手指压迫法阻断颈静脉以降低导管尖端位置不当的发生率,尤其是颈内静脉位置不当的发生率提供有价值的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验