• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晋升与终身教职推荐信:教师指南

Promotion and tenure letters: A guide for faculty.

作者信息

Gottlieb Michael, Chan Teresa M, Yarris Lalena M, Linden Judith A, Coates Wendy C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.

Divisions of Emergency Medicine and Education and Innovation Department of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2022 Jun 1;6(3):e10759. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10759. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/aet2.10759
PMID:35707393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9178369/
Abstract

Promotion and tenure (P&T) letters are a key component of the academic advancement portfolio. Despite their importance, many faculty are not trained to write these letters and there is limited literature describing the approach and key components. This paper reviews the role of P&T letters and provides general guidelines for writers. We present a step-by-step guide, which includes how to respond to requests, the role of institutional guidelines, providing context to the letter, evaluating candidates, and delivering an overall recommendation. Finally, we discuss current controversies in P&T letters. This paper is intended to help novice and more experienced writers to enhance their P&T letters, while also helping applicants for promotion understand what is being asked of their letter writers.

摘要

晋升与终身教职(P&T)推荐信是学术晋升材料的关键组成部分。尽管其很重要,但许多教员并未接受过撰写此类推荐信的培训,且描述撰写方法和关键组成部分的文献有限。本文回顾了P&T推荐信的作用,并为撰写者提供了一般指导原则。我们提供了一份循序渐进的指南,包括如何回应请求、机构指南的作用、为推荐信提供背景信息、评估候选人以及给出总体推荐意见。最后,我们讨论了P&T推荐信当前存在的争议。本文旨在帮助新手和经验更丰富的撰写者提升他们的P&T推荐信,同时也帮助晋升申请者了解对其推荐人的要求。

相似文献

1
Promotion and tenure letters: A guide for faculty.晋升与终身教职推荐信:教师指南
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Jun 1;6(3):e10759. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10759. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
More Than One-third of Orthopaedic Applicants Are in the Top 10%: The Standardized Letter of Recommendation and Evaluation of Orthopaedic Resident Applicants.超过三分之一的骨科申请人在前 10%:标准化推荐信和骨科住院医师申请人评估。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Aug 1;479(8):1703-1708. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001707.
3
Are Narrative Letters of Recommendation for Medical Students Interpreted as Intended by Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs?医学专业学生的叙事推荐信是否能被骨科住院医师项目按预期解读?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Aug 1;479(8):1679-1687. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001691.
4
Gender Distribution of Authors of Evaluation Letters for Promotion at One Medical School.某医学院晋升评估信作者的性别分布
Acad Med. 2022 Dec 1;97(12):1816-1823. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004803. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Influence of Gender on Surgical Residency Applicants' Recommendation Letters.性别对外科住院医师申请人推荐信的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):356-365.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.020. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Standardized Letters of Recommendation in Plastic Surgery: The Impact of Gender and Race.整形外科学术推荐信的标准化:性别和种族的影响
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 May 1;149(5):1022e-1031e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008991. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
A guide for writing anti-racist tenure and promotion letters.撰写反种族主义终身教职和晋升信的指南。
Elife. 2022 Nov 15;11:e79892. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79892.
8
Gendered Language in Letters of Recommendation for Applicants to Pulmonary Critical Care Fellowships.肺重症监护 fellowship 申请者推荐信中的性别化语言。
ATS Sch. 2022 Aug 22;3(3):413-424. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0004OC. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
The ADVICER Template for Faculty Reviewer Letters for Promotion and Appointment.促进和任命教师的 ADVICER 模板:评审人推荐信。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1413-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.027. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
10
The Intentions of Letter Writers for Applicants to a Baccalaureate-M.D. Program: Self-Report and Content Analyses of Letters of Reference.
Med Educ Online. 2006 Dec;11(1):4586. doi: 10.3402/meo.v11i.4586.

引用本文的文献

1
Underrepresented minority faculty in the USA face a double standard in promotion and tenure decisions.在美国,代表性不足的少数族裔教职员工在晋升和终身教职决策方面面临双重标准。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Nov;8(11):2107-2118. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01977-7. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
A guide to creating a high-quality cover letter.撰写高质量求职信指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Apr 30;8(3):e10988. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10988. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
A guide to creating an educator's portfolio for the 21st century.21世纪教育工作者作品集创建指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Feb 1;8(1):e10931. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10931. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Brain versus bot: Distinguishing letters of recommendation authored by humans compared with artificial intelligence.人脑与机器:区分由人类撰写的推荐信与人工智能撰写的推荐信。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Nov 30;7(6). doi: 10.1002/aet2.10924. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Educator's blueprint: A guide for clinician-educators to achieve promotion in emergency medicine.教育者蓝图:临床教育工作者在急诊医学领域获得晋升的指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 May 29;7(3):e10883. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10883. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
The next generation of researchers: One-year outcome data from the SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program.下一代研究人员:医学教育高级研究方法评估与设计(ARMED MedEd)项目的一年期结果数据。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Nov 21;6(6):e10818. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10818. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) in Nursing Science.《护理科学研究评估旧金山宣言》(DORA)
Nurs Sci Q. 2022 Apr;35(2):275-276. doi: 10.1177/08943184211070602.
2
Faculty Recruitment, Retention, and Representation in Leadership: An Evidence-Based Guide to Best Practices for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.医学教育领导者人才队伍建设、保留与代表性:住培主任理事会多样性、公平性和包容性实践的循证指南。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):62-71. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.8.53754.
3
A guide to creating a high-quality curriculum vitae.高质量简历创建指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10717. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10717. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
A guide to peer reviewing medical education scholarship: Advice from editors of .医学教育学术同行评审指南:来自《……》编辑的建议
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10652. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10652. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Addressing the Urgent Need for Racial Diversification in Emergency Medicine.满足急诊医学中对种族多元化的迫切需求。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;77(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion.学术推广中的数字学术共识指南。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 8;21(4):883-891. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.46441.
7
Criteria for academic promotion in medicine.医学学术晋升标准。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2253.
8
Scholarly Productivity and Impact: Developing a Quantifiable, Norm-based Benchmarking Methodology for Academic Emergency Medicine.学术产出与影响力:为急诊医学制定一种可量化的、基于规范的基准测试方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):594-604. doi: 10.1111/acem.13704. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
On Lampposts, Sneetches, and Stars: A Call to Go Beyond Bibliometrics for Determining Academic Value.论路灯柱、星肚史尼奇与星星:呼吁超越文献计量学来判定学术价值
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):688-694. doi: 10.1111/acem.13707. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
Development and validation of a health profession education-focused scholarly mentorship assessment tool.开发和验证以健康职业教育为重点的学术指导评估工具。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Feb;8(1):43-46. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0491-0.