• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对拉丁裔社区的 COVID-19 检测外展干预措施的有效性:一项整群随机试验。

Effectiveness of a COVID-19 Testing Outreach Intervention for Latinx Communities: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene.

Department of Counseling Psychology and Human Services, University of Oregon, Eugene.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16796.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16796
PMID:35708690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9204550/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Latinx individuals have been disproportionately affected during the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the spread of SARS-CoV-2. It is imperative to evaluate newly developed preventive interventions to assess their effect on COVID-19 health disparities.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of a culturally tailored outreach intervention designed to increase SARS-CoV-2 testing rates among Latinx populations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cluster randomized trial performed from February 1 to August 31, 2021, in community settings in 9 Oregon counties, 38 sites were randomized a priori (19 to the community health promoters intervention and 19 to outreach as usual wait-listed controls). Thirty-three sites were activated. A total of 394 SARS-CoV-2 testing events were held and 1851 diagnostic samples collected, of which 919 were from Latinx persons.

INTERVENTIONS

A culturally informed outreach program was developed that made use of promotores de salud (community health promoters) to increase Latinx SARS-CoV-2 testing. Strategies addressed barriers by disseminating information on testing events in English and Spanish, mitigating misinformation, and increasing trust.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the count of sample tests from Latinx persons and the sampled proportion of the Latinx populace. Site-level covariates included census tract Latinx populace, nativity (number of US-born individuals per 100 population), median age, and income inequality. Time-varying covariates included number of new weekly SARS-CoV-2-positive cases and percentage of vaccine coverage at the county level.

RESULTS

A total of 15 clusters (sites) were randomized to the control group and 18 to the community health promoters group. A total of 1851 test samples were collected, of which 995 (53.8%) were from female participants and 919 (49.6%) were from Latinx individuals. The intervention tested 3.84 (95% CI, 2.47-5.97) times more Latinx individuals per event than controls (incident rate ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.46-1.34; Cohen d = 0.74; P < .001). The intervention was associated with a 0.28 increase in the proportion of Latinx populace being tested compared with control sites for the dependent variable scaled as the proportion of the Latinx populace ×100, or a 0.003 proportion of the raw populace count. The use of a standardized scaling of the proportion of Latinx individuals showed that the relative percentage increase was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.21-0.86) in the intervention sites compared with controls, representing a medium effect size.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

To our knowledge, this was the first randomized evaluation of an outreach intervention designed to increase SARS-CoV-2 testing among Latinx populations. Findings could be used to implement strategies to reduce other health disparities experienced by these groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04793464.

摘要

重要性

在由 SARS-CoV-2 传播引起的 COVID-19 大流行中,拉丁裔个体受到了不成比例的影响。评估新开发的预防干预措施以评估其对 COVID-19 健康差异的影响至关重要。

目的

评估一种文化上合适的外展干预措施,旨在提高拉丁裔人群的 SARS-CoV-2 检测率。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项于 2021 年 2 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日在俄勒冈州 9 个县的社区环境中进行的聚类随机试验中,38 个站点预先随机化(19 个分配给社区健康促进者干预组,19 个分配给常规等待的对照组)。有 33 个站点被激活。共进行了 394 次 SARS-CoV-2 检测活动,并采集了 1851 份诊断样本,其中 919 份来自拉丁裔人群。

干预措施

制定了一项文化知情的外展计划,利用 promotores de salud(社区健康促进者)来增加拉丁裔的 SARS-CoV-2 检测。策略通过以英语和西班牙语传播检测事件信息、减轻错误信息和增加信任来解决障碍。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是拉丁裔个体的样本检测次数和拉丁裔人群的抽样比例。站点级别的协变量包括人口普查区的拉丁裔人口、出生地(每 100 人口中美国出生的人数)、中位年龄和收入不平等。时间变化的协变量包括县一级每周新的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性病例数和疫苗接种覆盖率百分比。

结果

共有 15 个(站点)被随机分配到对照组,18 个被分配到社区健康促进者组。共采集了 1851 个测试样本,其中 995 个(53.8%)来自女性参与者,919 个(49.6%)来自拉丁裔个体。与对照组相比,干预组每检测事件检测到的拉丁裔个体多 3.84 倍(发病率比,0.79;95%置信区间,0.46-1.34;Cohen d = 0.74;P <.001)。与对照组相比,干预组检测到的拉丁裔人群比例增加了 0.28 个百分点,用于依赖变量,即拉丁裔人群比例×100 的比例,或原始人群计数的 0.003 个百分点。使用拉丁裔个体比例的标准化比例进行缩放表明,与对照组相比,干预组的相对百分比增加了 0.53(95%置信区间,0.21-0.86),这代表了中等效应大小。

结论和相关性

据我们所知,这是首次对旨在提高拉丁裔人群中 SARS-CoV-2 检测率的外展干预措施进行随机评估。研究结果可用于实施策略,以减少这些群体所经历的其他健康差异。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04793464。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9550/9204550/34f868376f18/jamanetwopen-e2216796-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9550/9204550/f8ebd969c65b/jamanetwopen-e2216796-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9550/9204550/828df200268d/jamanetwopen-e2216796-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9550/9204550/34f868376f18/jamanetwopen-e2216796-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9550/9204550/f8ebd969c65b/jamanetwopen-e2216796-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9550/9204550/828df200268d/jamanetwopen-e2216796-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9550/9204550/34f868376f18/jamanetwopen-e2216796-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a COVID-19 Testing Outreach Intervention for Latinx Communities: A Cluster Randomized Trial.针对拉丁裔社区的 COVID-19 检测外展干预措施的有效性:一项整群随机试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16796.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Development and design of a culturally tailored intervention to address COVID-19 disparities among Oregon's Latinx communities: A community case study.制定和设计一项具有文化针对性的干预措施,以解决俄勒冈州拉丁裔社区中 COVID-19 的差异问题:一项社区案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:962862. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.962862. eCollection 2022.
5
Black and Latinx Community Perspectives on COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors, Testing, and Vaccines.黑人和拉丁裔社区对 COVID-19 缓解行为、检测和疫苗的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117074. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17074.
6
Perceptions of the Coronavirus and COVID-19 testing and vaccination in Latinx and Indigenous Mexican immigrant communities in the Eastern Coachella Valley.拉丁裔和土生墨西哥裔移民社区对冠状病毒和 COVID-19 检测及疫苗接种的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 21;22(1):1019. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13375-7.
7
Evaluation of Allocation Schemes of COVID-19 Testing Resources in a Community-Based Door-to-Door Testing Program.社区逐户新冠病毒检测项目中新冠病毒检测资源分配方案的评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 27;2(8):e212260. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2260. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Reaching Latinx Communities with Algorithmic Optimization for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Locations.利用算法优化寻找 SARS-CoV-2 检测点,以触达拉丁裔社区。
Prev Sci. 2023 Aug;24(6):1249-1260. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01478-x. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
9
Integrating Rapid Diabetes Screening Into a Latinx Focused Community-Based Low-Barrier COVID-19 Testing Program.将快速糖尿病筛查纳入以拉丁裔为重点的基于社区的低障碍COVID-19检测项目。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214163. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14163.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health and COVID-19 vaccination: An individual participant data meta-analysis of adult Latino participants.健康的社会决定因素与新冠病毒疫苗接种:成年拉丁裔参与者的个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Prev Med. 2025 Sep;198:108335. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108335. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation: A systematic realist review.对抗新冠疫情错误信息的干预措施:一项系统现实主义综述
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0321818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321818. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of behavioral intervention components to increase COVID-19 testing for African American/Black and Latine frontline essential workers not up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccination: Results of an optimization randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between early country-level COVID-19 testing capacity and later COVID-19 mortality outcomes.国家层面早期新冠病毒检测能力与后期新冠病毒死亡率结果之间的关联。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022 Jan;16(1):56-62. doi: 10.1111/irv.12906. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
2
Pharmacist-provided SARS-CoV-2 testing targeting a majority-Hispanic community during the early COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a patient perception survey.药剂师针对多数为西班牙裔的社区在 COVID-19 大流行早期提供的 SARS-CoV-2 检测:患者感知调查结果。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
3
行为干预组件对未接种新冠疫苗的非裔美国/黑人及拉丁裔一线必要工作者增加新冠病毒检测的影响:一项优化随机对照试验的结果
J Behav Med. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00566-x.
4
Social Determinants of Health Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Testing and Vaccine Attitudes in a Cross-Sectional Study of Latinx Individuals in Oregon.俄勒冈州拉丁裔个体横断面研究中与新冠病毒检测及疫苗态度相关的健康社会决定因素
AJPM Focus. 2025 Feb 19;4(3):100326. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100326. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Attendance of Underserved Populations at Field-Based Health Services Events: Application of Quasi-Experimental Methods that Accommodate the COVID-19 Pandemic.弱势群体参加现场医疗服务活动:适用于新冠疫情的准实验方法应用
Prev Sci. 2025 Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01769-z.
6
Indications of digital literacy during Latino-focused, community-based COVID-19 testing implementation.以拉丁裔为重点、基于社区的新冠病毒检测实施过程中的数字素养指标。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Nov 11;7(4):ooae115. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae115. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Reviving health mediation during the COVID-19 crisis and beyond: an implementation study in deprived neighbourhoods of Marseille, France.在 COVID-19 危机期间及之后恢复健康调解:法国马赛贫困社区的实施研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;12:1313575. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1313575. eCollection 2024.
8
Community Partner Perceptions of Equitable Implementation Practices for a Intervention: A Qualitative Assessment.社区合作伙伴对干预措施公平实施实践的看法:定性评估。
Am J Public Health. 2024 May;114(S5):S377-S383. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307686.
9
Lessons From COVID-19 Testing Research: The Power of Rapid Response.新冠病毒检测研究的经验教训:快速响应的力量。
Am J Public Health. 2024 May;114(S5):S343-S346. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307653.
10
A Translational Case Study of a Multisite COVID-19 Public Health Intervention Across Sequenced Research Trials: Embedding Implementation in a Community Engagement Phased Framework.一项多地点 COVID-19 公共卫生干预措施的转化案例研究:在社区参与分阶段框架中嵌入实施。
Am J Public Health. 2024 May;114(S5):S396-S401. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307669.
A Community-Adapted Approach to SARS-CoV-2 Testing for Medically Underserved Populations, Rhode Island, USA.
美国罗德岛针对医疗服务不足人群的 SARS-CoV-2 检测的社区适应性方法。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;27(9):2445-2449. doi: 10.3201/eid2709.204874.
4
Racial and ethnic inequities in the early distribution of U.S. COVID-19 testing sites and mortality.美国 COVID-19 检测点和死亡率的早期分布存在种族和民族差异。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Nov;51(11):e13669. doi: 10.1111/eci.13669. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
COVID-19 Testing and Vaccine Hesitancy in Latinx Farm-Working Communities in The Eastern Coachella Valley.东科切拉谷拉丁裔农场工人社区的新冠病毒检测与疫苗犹豫情况
Res Sq. 2021 Jun 25:rs.3.rs-587686. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-587686/v1.
6
Addressing Racial/Ethnic Equity in Access to COVID-19 Testing Through Drive-Thru And Walk-In Testing Sites in Chicago.通过芝加哥的免下车和步行检测点解决新冠病毒检测中的种族/民族公平问题。
Med Res Arch. 2021 May;9(5). doi: 10.18103/mra.v9i5.2430. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
COVID-19 Testing and Social Determinants of Health Among Disadvantaged Baltimore Neighborhoods: A Community Mobile Health Clinic Outreach Model.巴尔的摩贫困社区中新冠病毒检测与健康的社会决定因素:一种社区移动健康诊所外展模式
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Dec;24(6):657-663. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0066. Epub 2021 May 24.
8
To Latinx or Not to Latinx: A Question of Gender Inclusivity Versus Gender Neutrality.是用拉丁裔(Latinx)还是不用:一个性别包容性与性别中立性的问题。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jun;111(6):1018-1021. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306238.
9
Rethink how we plan research to shrink COVID health disparities.重新思考我们规划研究的方式,以缩小新冠疫情造成的健康差距。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):9. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00258-x.
10
Correlation of population mortality of COVID-19 and testing coverage: a comparison among 36 OECD countries.新冠疫情下 36 个经合组织国家人口死亡率与检测覆盖率的相关性比较。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Dec 28;149:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820003076.