Emeritus Head of Gastroenterology, Ev. Krankenhaus Kalk, University of Cologne, Germany.
Department for Gastroenterology, Infectious diseases and Rheumatology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1714-1724. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081.
Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient's preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis.
This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient's preference, physician's global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed.
Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam.
In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated.
直肠炎是溃疡性结肠炎中最不广泛的类型,很少对直肠治疗进行研究,也未得到充分利用。本研究评估了一种新型布地奈德栓剂 4mg 与市售布地奈德直肠泡沫剂 2mg 相比,用于治疗轻度至中度溃疡性直肠炎的疗效、安全性和患者偏好。
这是一项随机、双盲、双模拟、活性对照试验。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受每日一次布地奈德 4mg 栓剂或布地奈德 2mg 泡沫剂治疗,共 8 周。主要共同终点是从基线到第 8 周时临床症状的变化,其中临床缓解定义为改良后的溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动指数(UC-DAI)粪便频率评分 0 或 1,直肠出血评分 0,黏膜愈合定义为改良后的 UC-DAI 黏膜外观评分 0 或 1。使用更严格的标准,我们还分析了黏膜深度愈合,定义为黏膜外观评分 0。还评估和分析了患者的偏好、医生的总体评估和生活质量。
总体而言,分别有 286 名和 291 名患者纳入 4mg 栓剂和 2mg 泡沫剂组。布地奈德 4mg 栓剂在临床缓解和黏膜愈合的主要共同终点均达到非劣效于 2mg 泡沫剂的预设标准。次要终点一致支持栓剂的非劣效性。在美沙拉嗪无应答者亚组中观察到有利于栓剂的趋势。更多的患者表示更喜欢栓剂而不是直肠泡沫剂。
在溃疡性直肠炎患者中,布地奈德 4mg 栓剂在疗效上不劣于布地奈德 2mg 泡沫剂,且两者均安全且耐受良好。