Suppr超能文献

新型布地奈德栓剂与标准布地奈德直肠泡沫剂治疗活动性溃疡性直肠炎的临床缓解率和黏膜愈合率高:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。

Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial.

机构信息

Emeritus Head of Gastroenterology, Ev. Krankenhaus Kalk, University of Cologne, Germany.

Department for Gastroenterology, Infectious diseases and Rheumatology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1714-1724. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient's preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient's preference, physician's global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed.

RESULTS

Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated.

摘要

背景与目的

直肠炎是溃疡性结肠炎中最不广泛的类型,很少对直肠治疗进行研究,也未得到充分利用。本研究评估了一种新型布地奈德栓剂 4mg 与市售布地奈德直肠泡沫剂 2mg 相比,用于治疗轻度至中度溃疡性直肠炎的疗效、安全性和患者偏好。

方法

这是一项随机、双盲、双模拟、活性对照试验。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受每日一次布地奈德 4mg 栓剂或布地奈德 2mg 泡沫剂治疗,共 8 周。主要共同终点是从基线到第 8 周时临床症状的变化,其中临床缓解定义为改良后的溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动指数(UC-DAI)粪便频率评分 0 或 1,直肠出血评分 0,黏膜愈合定义为改良后的 UC-DAI 黏膜外观评分 0 或 1。使用更严格的标准,我们还分析了黏膜深度愈合,定义为黏膜外观评分 0。还评估和分析了患者的偏好、医生的总体评估和生活质量。

结果

总体而言,分别有 286 名和 291 名患者纳入 4mg 栓剂和 2mg 泡沫剂组。布地奈德 4mg 栓剂在临床缓解和黏膜愈合的主要共同终点均达到非劣效于 2mg 泡沫剂的预设标准。次要终点一致支持栓剂的非劣效性。在美沙拉嗪无应答者亚组中观察到有利于栓剂的趋势。更多的患者表示更喜欢栓剂而不是直肠泡沫剂。

结论

在溃疡性直肠炎患者中,布地奈德 4mg 栓剂在疗效上不劣于布地奈德 2mg 泡沫剂,且两者均安全且耐受良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc54/9683080/0e45003531ed/jjac081f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验