Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Centre for Applied Behavioural Sciences and Department of Psychology, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Gerontology. 2023;69(3):336-355. doi: 10.1159/000524666. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
Activity engagement is a modifiable factor that has been widely-cited as being good for the aging brain and cognition and represents a valuable target for reducing dementia risk. However, specific issues about activity engagement (mental, social, and physical) and cognition in older adulthood remain, and Bielak [Gerontology 2010;56: 507-519] reviewed seven major methodological and theoretical questions about this relationship. We present an updated reflection on these key questions, focusing on research published in the last 10 years. For some questions, a significant amount of work has been done and conclusions have become clearer; for others, there have been few additions to the literature and our knowledge remains much the same as it was a decade ago. We review the issues identified in the 2010 paper including the directionality and temporal nature of the relationship; whether specific activity domains offer different benefits to cognition and what domain(s) of cognition are affected; variation in the relation by age, gender, or education; potential mechanisms involved; and how activity engagement is assessed. For each, we present the most up-to-date research, discuss remaining challenges and possible future directions. This formal unifying of the information in the field is intended as a guide to support continued progress by spurring on studies addressing specific questions while reminding researchers of critical issues. We conclude with recommendations that future studies investigating the link between activity engagement and cognitive performance in adulthood should consider.
活动参与是一个可改变的因素,被广泛认为对衰老的大脑和认知有益,是降低痴呆风险的一个有价值的目标。然而,关于老年人的活动参与(心理、社会和身体)和认知的具体问题仍然存在,Bielak [老年医学 2010;56: 507-519] 回顾了关于这种关系的七个主要方法和理论问题。我们对这些关键问题进行了更新的思考,重点关注了过去 10 年发表的研究。对于一些问题,已经做了大量的工作,结论变得更加清晰;对于其他问题,文献中几乎没有增加,我们的知识与十年前相比并没有太大的变化。我们回顾了 2010 年论文中确定的问题,包括关系的方向性和时间性质;特定活动领域是否对认知有不同的益处,以及受影响的认知领域是什么;年龄、性别或教育的差异;潜在的涉及机制;以及如何评估活动参与。对于每一个问题,我们都呈现了最新的研究,讨论了仍然存在的挑战和可能的未来方向。对该领域信息的正式统一旨在作为指导,通过鼓励解决具体问题的研究来支持持续进展,同时提醒研究人员注意关键问题。我们最后提出了建议,未来研究应考虑在成年期调查活动参与与认知表现之间的联系。