University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg; Sciences Po, Paris.
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Oct;31(7):885-902. doi: 10.1177/09636625221093897. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
Public attitudes toward science have risen for decades yet dropped in the most recent period coinciding with the emergence of anti-scientific populist discourses around the world. Controlling for a number of attitudinal and demographic factors, this study examines whether populist discourse and vote share as well as regime polity have an impact on the public legitimacy of science in the period 2005-2020. Cross-national findings suggest that populism is a consistent predictor of declining support for science across all models, regardless of the political system. While it might be too early to alert to lasting damage done by populist leaders to the public standing of science, more research is warranted to ascertain the impact of anti-scientific rhetoric in the "post-truth era."
几十年来,公众对科学的态度一直在上升,但在最近一段时间,随着世界各地反科学民粹主义话语的出现,这种态度有所下降。本研究在控制了一系列态度和人口统计因素的情况下,考察了民粹主义话语和选票份额以及政权政治是否会对 2005 年至 2020 年期间科学的公众合法性产生影响。跨国研究结果表明,无论政治制度如何,民粹主义都是所有模型中科学支持率下降的一致预测因素。虽然现在就警惕民粹主义领导人对科学公众形象造成的持久损害还为时过早,但有必要进行更多的研究,以确定“后真相时代”反科学言论的影响。