Prade-Weiss Juliane
Department of Comparative Literature, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, 80799, Germany.
Open Res Eur. 2023 Jul 26;3:23. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15469.2. eCollection 2023.
: Populism is often perceived as a shamelessly loud segment of political discourse. However, Jelinek's play , written on the occasion of Trump's 2016 election as US president, suggests that populism leads to societal silencing. Jelinek's text expounds that when a society's public sphere is marked by ubiquitous enmity against an imagined "we", grounded in antagonism, then the possibility of speaking to one another disappears, because speaking to one another is based on the willingness to give one's counterpart space and listen to them. In a public discourse that stages enmity, the counterpart vanishes. Therefore, populism, loud as it is, leads to the silencing of whole communities insofar as they are left with nothing in common but enmity. : Critical discourse analysis is used to contextualise close readings of select passages of Jelinek's play with recent social sciences and humanities research on global populisms to highlight what literary language and the dramatic form can contribute to understanding populism. : The silencing populisms entail is fed, in large part, by a dynamics linking the interpersonal emotion of shame to its discursive exploitation in shamelessness and shaming: populist voices transgress rules of democratic debate in the public sphere to elicit outrage by mainstream politics, media, and civil society, which often retort populist shamelessness by shaming populist actors. The audience excitement populist leaders and supporters generate is an important factor in normalizing the emotional, moralizing populist polarization of "us" versus "them" that undermines differentiated discussion and a dispute of arguments. : While media and research commonly suggest that with the populist reduction of politics to a spectacle, citizens become a passive audience, the article expounds that audiences play a key role in the production of populist enmity. This insight offers an alley to counteract populism.
民粹主义常常被视为政治话语中一段恬不知耻的喧嚣。然而,耶利内克在特朗普2016年当选美国总统之际创作的戏剧表明,民粹主义会导致社会沉默。耶利内克的文本阐述道,当一个社会的公共领域以对一个想象中的“我们”的普遍敌意(基于对抗)为特征时,相互交谈的可能性就消失了,因为相互交谈基于愿意给对方空间并倾听他们。在一场以敌意上演的公共话语中,对方消失了。因此,民粹主义尽管喧嚣,却会导致整个社群沉默,因为它们除了敌意之外没有任何共同之处。批判性话语分析用于将对耶利内克戏剧选段的细读与近期关于全球民粹主义的社会科学和人文研究相结合,以突出文学语言和戏剧形式对理解民粹主义的贡献。民粹主义导致的沉默在很大程度上是由一种将羞耻的人际情感与其在恬不知耻和羞辱中的话语利用联系起来的动态机制所推动的:民粹主义声音违反公共领域中民主辩论的规则,以引发主流政治、媒体和公民社会的愤怒,而它们常常通过羞辱民粹主义行为者来回击民粹主义的恬不知耻。民粹主义领导人及其支持者引发的观众兴奋情绪是使“我们”与“他们”之间情绪化、道德化的民粹主义两极分化正常化的一个重要因素,这种两极分化破坏了差异化讨论和论点之争。虽然媒体和研究通常认为,随着民粹主义将政治简化为一场闹剧,公民变成了被动的观众,但本文阐述了观众在民粹主义敌意的产生中起着关键作用。这一见解为对抗民粹主义提供了一条途径。