• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用敏捷方法学对养老院提供以患者为中心的护理进行再工程:一个案例研究。

Applying Agile Methodology to Reengineer the Delivery of Person-Centered Care in a Nursing Home: A Case Study.

机构信息

Scripps Gerontology Center, Department of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.

Computer and Information Technology, Miami University Hamilton, Hamilton, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Sep;23(9):1442-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.012
PMID:35714701
Abstract

Nursing home (NH) providers would benefit from adopting evidence-based measures for gathering and utilizing resident preference information in their daily care activities. However, providers face barriers when implementing assessment tools used to promote person-centered care (PCC). Although Agile methodology is not commonly used in NH settings, this case study shows how it can be used to achieve the goal of delivering preference-based, PCC, within a large NH. We present a road map for breaking down care processes, prioritizing, and implementing iterative plan, do, study, act cycles using Agile methodology to enhance group collaboration on quality improvement cycles, to achieve our goal of providing preference-based PCC. We first determined if care plans reflected each resident's important preferences, developed a method for tracking whether residents attended activities that matched their preferences, and determined if residents were satisfied that their preferences were being met. These efforts had positive effects throughout the NH particularly when COVID-19 limited visitors and significantly modified staff workflow. Specifically, Agile processes helped staff to know how to honor preferences during quarantines which necessitated a shift to individualized (and not group) approaches for meeting preferences for social contact, comfort, and belonging. The ready availability of preference-based reporting was critical to quickly informing new staff on how to meet residents' most important preferences. Based on lessons learned, we describe a developmental approach that other providers can consider for adoption. Implications of this work are discussed in terms of the need for provider training in Agile methodologies to support iterative improvements, the need for policies that reimburse providers for their efforts, and additional research around workflow processes.

摘要

养老院(NH)提供者从采用基于证据的措施中受益,这些措施用于在日常护理活动中收集和利用居民的偏好信息。然而,提供者在实施用于促进以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的评估工具时会遇到障碍。尽管敏捷方法在 NH 环境中并不常用,但本案例研究展示了如何在大型 NH 中使用它来实现提供基于偏好的 PCC 的目标。我们提供了一个路线图,用于分解护理流程、确定优先级并使用敏捷方法实施迭代计划、执行和行动循环,以增强小组在质量改进循环上的协作,从而实现我们提供基于偏好的 PCC 的目标。我们首先确定护理计划是否反映了每个居民的重要偏好,开发了一种跟踪居民是否参加与其偏好相匹配的活动的方法,并确定居民是否满意他们的偏好得到满足。这些努力在整个 NH 中产生了积极的影响,尤其是在 COVID-19 限制访客并显著改变员工工作流程时。具体来说,敏捷流程帮助员工在需要进行隔离时了解如何尊重偏好,这需要转向个性化(而不是团体)方法来满足社交接触、舒适和归属感等偏好。基于偏好的报告的随时可用对于快速告知新员工如何满足居民最重要的偏好至关重要。根据经验教训,我们描述了一种发展方法,其他提供者可以考虑采用。本工作的影响涉及到提供者在敏捷方法方面的培训需求,以支持迭代改进、需要为提供者的努力提供补偿的政策,以及围绕工作流程的进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Applying Agile Methodology to Reengineer the Delivery of Person-Centered Care in a Nursing Home: A Case Study.应用敏捷方法学对养老院提供以患者为中心的护理进行再工程:一个案例研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Sep;23(9):1442-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
"It's important, but…": Perceived Barriers and Situational Dependencies to Social Contact Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.“这很重要,但是……”:养老院居民社会接触偏好的感知障碍和情境依赖性。
Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1126-1135. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx109.
3
New toolkit to measure quality of person-centered care: development and pilot evaluation with nursing home communities.衡量以患者为中心护理质量的新工具包:在疗养院社区的开发与试点评估
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Sep;15(9):671-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.养老院居民偏好随时间的变化。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1092-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
"We can't provide season tickets to the opera": Staff perceptions of providing preference based person centered care.“我们无法提供歌剧季票”:工作人员对基于偏好提供以人为本护理的看法。
Clin Gerontol. 2016;39(3):190-209. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2016.1151968. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Evaluating the Implementation of a Pragmatic Person-Centered Communication Tool for the Nursing Home Setting: PAL Cards.评估适用于养老院环境的实用以人为主沟通工具 PAL 卡的实施情况。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 May-Jun;45(3):634-646. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.1929632. Epub 2021 May 31.
8
Assessment of Nursing Staff Learning Needs Around Person-Centered Risk Management in Nursing Homes.养老院中以患者为中心的风险管理方面护理人员学习需求评估
J Gerontol Nurs. 2023 Feb;49(2):7-12. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20230106-02. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
9
"Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.“让我感到安心自在”:养老院居民的差异化护理偏好
Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):702-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv026. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Pervasive Risk Avoidance: Nursing Staff Perceptions of Risk in Person-Centered Care Delivery.普遍风险规避:护理人员对以患者为中心的护理服务中的风险的看法。
Gerontologist. 2020 Nov 23;60(8):1424-1435. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa099.

引用本文的文献

1
How Have Quality Improvement Strategies Been Adopted and How Has Impact Been Assessed in Care Homes for Older People? A Systematic Search and Narrative Review.在养老院中,质量改进策略是如何被采用的,以及影响是如何被评估的?一项系统检索与叙述性综述
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Sep;20(5):e70036. doi: 10.1111/opn.70036.
2
Taking Action to Support Nursing Home Resident Well-Being: Perspectives of U.S. Nursing Home Staff During COVID-19.采取行动支持养老院居民的福祉:COVID-19 期间美国养老院工作人员的观点
Gerontologist. 2024 Dec 17;65(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae184.