Cowdell Fiona, Harvey Hannah, Dyson Judith
Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Sep;20(5):e70036. doi: 10.1111/opn.70036.
We conducted a systematic search and narrative review of quality improvement in care homes. Our aim was to examine how quality improvement strategies have been adopted and how impact has been assessed in care homes for older people.
Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted systematic searches of the electronic databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, PsycINFO and Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) (2019-2024). We replicated the search strategy of a previously published review. Three co-authors undertook selection and data extraction.
Forty-four articles were included describing varied stages of quality improvement initiatives in care homes. The United States produced the largest number of studies. Quality improvement strategies were often poorly reported. Included papers reported stages of quality improvement from inception to evaluation. Most aimed for improved clinical outcomes, mainly those subject to external scrutiny. Few studies reported impact robustly. Quantitative measures, surveys and qualitative data were reported alongside staff-reported changes. There was no evidence of sustained improvement. There is some evidence of the use of theories, models and frameworks usually associated with implementation and knowledge mobilisation.
Current improvement practice is inconsistent and having limited impact.
We recommend any initiative to enhance resident experience and outcomes should involve establishing a project team, moving away from a deficit model, prioritising areas for improvement, identifying best practice, deciding how to measure improvement, understanding the challenges to best practice, co-designing strategies to effect change, sustaining the improvement, sharing learning and providing clear, detailed and accessible reporting.
我们对养老院的质量改进进行了系统检索和叙述性综述。我们的目的是研究质量改进策略是如何被采用的,以及在老年人养老院中如何评估其影响。
遵循PRISMA指南,我们对电子数据库护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、医学索引数据库(Medline)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)和应用社会科学索引与文摘数据库(ASSIA)(2019 - 2024年)进行了系统检索。我们复制了之前发表的一篇综述的检索策略。三位共同作者进行了筛选和数据提取。
纳入了44篇文章,描述了养老院质量改进举措的不同阶段。美国开展的研究数量最多。质量改进策略的报告往往很差。纳入的论文报告了质量改进从启动到评估的各个阶段。大多数旨在改善临床结果,主要是那些受到外部审查的结果。很少有研究有力地报告了影响。除了工作人员报告的变化外,还报告了定量措施、调查和定性数据。没有持续改进的证据。有一些证据表明使用了通常与实施和知识传播相关的理论、模型和框架。
当前的改进实践不一致且影响有限。
我们建议,任何旨在提升居民体验和结果的举措都应包括组建一个项目团队,摒弃缺陷模式,确定改进的优先领域,识别最佳实践,决定如何衡量改进,了解最佳实践面临的挑战,共同设计实现变革的策略,维持改进,分享经验教训,并提供清晰、详细且易于获取的报告。