• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院居民偏好随时间的变化。

The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Gerontology, Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH.

Independent Research Consultant, Ardmore, PA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1092-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.004
PMID:30287264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6252281/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Nursing home (NH) residents' preferences for everyday living are the foundation for delivering individualized person-centered care. Yet, work has not examined what the most and least important preferences of nursing home residents are and if those preferences change over time.

DESIGN

This study examined the change in nursing home residents' (n = 255) preferences for everyday living over a 3-month period. Participants were recruited from 28 NHs in the suburbs of a major metropolitan East Coast area of the United States.

MEASURES

Residents were interviewed face-to-face using the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory-Nursing Home version at baseline (T1) and 3 months later (T2). Change was analyzed in 2 ways: (1) percentage exact agreement (eg, respondent stated "very important" at both time points) and (2) percentage of preferences that remained either important or not important between T1 and T2.

RESULTS

Sixteen preferences were rated as very or somewhat important by 90% or more of NH residents. With regard to the stability of preference ratings, findings demonstrate an average exact agreement of 59%, and an average important versus not important agreement of 82%. In addition, 68 of the 72 preferences had 70% or higher stability over time. In other words, the preference either remained "important" or "not important" to the NH resident 3 months later. Preferences in the domain of enlisting others in care had the least amount of change.

CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the most important everyday living preferences of NH residents and provides assurance to care providers that the majority of preferences assessed via the PELI are both important to NH residents and stable over time. Preference-based care plans can be designed and used over a 3-month period with confidence by providers.

摘要

目的

养老院(NH)居民对日常生活的偏好是提供个性化以患者为中心的护理的基础。然而,目前的研究尚未探讨 NH 居民最重要和最不重要的偏好是什么,以及这些偏好是否随时间而变化。

设计

本研究在 3 个月的时间内考察了 NH 居民(n=255)对日常生活偏好的变化。参与者是从美国东海岸大都市郊区的 28 家 NH 招募的。

措施

居民在基线(T1)和 3 个月后(T2)使用日常生活偏好清单-养老院版(PELI-NH)进行面对面访谈。通过两种方式分析变化:(1)百分比完全一致(例如,受访者在两个时间点都表示“非常重要”)和(2)在 T1 和 T2 之间保持重要或不重要的偏好百分比。

结果

16 种偏好被 90%或以上的 NH 居民评为非常重要或有些重要。关于偏好评分的稳定性,研究结果表明平均完全一致率为 59%,重要与不重要的平均一致率为 82%。此外,72 种偏好中有 68 种在 3 个月内保持了 70%或更高的稳定性。换句话说,该偏好对 NH 居民来说仍然是“重要”或“不重要”。在招募他人参与护理的领域,偏好的变化最小。

结论/意义:本研究强调了 NH 居民最重要的日常生活偏好,并向护理提供者保证,通过 PELI 评估的大多数偏好对 NH 居民既重要,且随时间稳定。提供者可以有信心在 3 个月的时间内设计和使用基于偏好的护理计划。

相似文献

1
The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.养老院居民偏好随时间的变化。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1092-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
The impact of nursing home residents' characteristics on ratings of importance of autonomy preferences in daily care over time.随着时间推移,养老院居民特征对日常护理中自主偏好重要性评级的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Aug;24(8):1334-1341. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1584875. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
Important Care and Activity Preferences in a Nationally Representative Sample of Nursing Home Residents.全国代表性样本的养老院居民的重要护理和活动偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Preference Consistency: Veteran and Non-Veteran Nursing Home Resident Self-Reported Preferences for Everyday Living.偏好一致性:养老院居住的退伍军人和非退伍军人的自我报告的日常生活偏好。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Mar 1;46(3):15-25. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200129-06.
6
Preferences for Everyday Living: Understanding the Impact of Cognitive Status on Preference Importance Ratings in Nursing Homes.日常生活偏好:了解认知状态对养老院偏好重要性评分的影响。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2018 May 1;44(5):9-17. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20171002-03. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
7
The Stability of Nursing Home Residents' Ratings of Importance of Recreation Preferences Over One Year.养老院居民对娱乐偏好重要性的评分在一年内的稳定性。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Aug;41(8):1942-1951. doi: 10.1177/07334648221089239. Epub 2022 May 4.
8
"Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.“让我感到安心自在”:养老院居民的差异化护理偏好
Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):702-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv026. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
Honoring the Everyday Preferences of Nursing Home Residents: Perceived Choice and Satisfaction With Care.尊重养老院居民的日常偏好:对护理的感知选择与满意度
Gerontologist. 2017 Jun 1;57(3):479-486. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv697.
10
Sustainability of the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory Use in Ohio Nursing Homes Over Time.随着时间的推移,俄亥俄州养老院对日常生活偏好量表使用的可持续性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Oct;25(10):105224. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105224. Epub 2024 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Engagement Calendar Deviations in Assisted Living: A Focus on Residents With Dementia.审视辅助生活中活动日程安排的偏差:聚焦于患有痴呆症的居民。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Dec 17:7334648241306572. doi: 10.1177/07334648241306572.
2
Nursing Home Resident Preferences for Daily Care and Activities: A Latent Class Analysis of National Data.养老院居民对日常护理和活动的偏好:基于全国数据的潜在类别分析。
Gerontologist. 2024 Feb 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad089.
3
Measuring Nursing Home Quality of Life: Validated Measures Are Poorly Correlated With Proxies From MDS and Quality of Life Deficiency Citationsl.

本文引用的文献

1
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
2
Preferences for Everyday Living: Understanding the Impact of Cognitive Status on Preference Importance Ratings in Nursing Homes.日常生活偏好:了解认知状态对养老院偏好重要性评分的影响。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2018 May 1;44(5):9-17. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20171002-03. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
3
"We can't provide season tickets to the opera": Staff perceptions of providing preference based person centered care.
衡量养老院生活质量:经验证的测量方法与 MDS 和生活质量缺陷引文的代理指标相关性较差。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 May;24(5):718-722.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.014. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
A systematic review to identify the use of stated preference research in the field of older adult care.一项旨在确定老年人护理领域中陈述性偏好研究应用情况的系统评价。
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Nov 7;19(4):1005-1056. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00738-7. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Wishes and Needs of Nursing Home Residents: A Scoping Review.养老院居民的愿望和需求:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 6;10(5):854. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050854.
6
Predictors of change over time in satisfaction with outdoor activities ratings among long-term care services and supports recipients.长期护理服务和支持接受者中对户外活动满意度随时间变化的预测因素。
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;45:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
7
Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.非裔美国人和白人养老院居民的偏好重要性评分。
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;46(1):111-121. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.2007436. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
8
Longitudinal differences in everyday preferences: Comparisons between people with cognitive impairment and their care partners.日常偏好的纵向差异:认知障碍者与其护理伙伴之间的比较。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;37(1). doi: 10.1002/gps.5620.
9
Assessing Social Functioning During COVID-19 and Beyond: Tools and Considerations for Nursing Home Staff.评估 COVID-19 期间及之后的社会功能:养老院工作人员的工具和注意事项。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Oct;22(10):1989-1997. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.07.022. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
10
Unmet and Unimportant Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents: What Are Key Resident and Facility Factors?养老院居民未得到满足且不重要的偏好:关键的居民和机构因素有哪些?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Nov;21(11):1712-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.033. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
“我们无法提供歌剧季票”:工作人员对基于偏好提供以人为本护理的看法。
Clin Gerontol. 2016;39(3):190-209. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2016.1151968. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
Person-Centered Care: A Definition and Essential Elements.以患者为中心的护理:定义与基本要素
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan;64(1):15-8. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13866. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Values and preferences: defining preference construction.价值观和偏好:偏好构建的定义。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;2(2):193-205. doi: 10.1002/wcs.98. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
6
Cognitive Interviewing: Revising the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory for Use In the Nursing Home.认知访谈:修订用于养老院的日常生活偏好量表。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):24-34. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20150522-04. Epub 2015 May 28.
7
The consistency of self-reported preferences for everyday living: implications for person-centered care delivery.自我报告的日常生活偏好的一致性:对以患者为中心的护理服务的影响。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 Oct;40(10):34-46. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140820-01.
8
"It Depends": Reasons Why Nursing Home Residents Change Their Minds About Care Preferences.“视情况而定”:疗养院居民改变护理偏好的原因
Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56(2):243-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu040. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
A randomized controlled trial for an individualized positive psychosocial intervention for the affective and behavioral symptoms of dementia in nursing home residents.一项个体化正性心理社会干预对养老院居民痴呆情感和行为症状的随机对照试验。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):35-45. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt102. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10
The preferences for everyday living inventory: scale development and description of psychosocial preferences responses in community-dwelling elders.日常生活偏好量表:社区居住老年人的量表编制及心理社会偏好反应描述。
Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):582-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns102. Epub 2012 Aug 30.