• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性复习可以重置对遗忘信息的回忆。

Selective restudy can reset recall of forgotten information.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2202-2210. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02131-y. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-022-02131-y
PMID:35715684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9722892/
Abstract

Recall of studied material is typically impaired as time between study and test increases. Selective restudy can interrupt such time-dependent forgetting by enhancing recall not only of the restudied but also of the not restudied material. In two experiments, we examined whether this interruption of time-dependent forgetting reflects a transient or more lasting effect on recall performance. We analyzed time-dependent forgetting of studied items right after study and after time-lagged selective restudy. Restudy boosted recall of the not restudied items up to the levels observed directly after study and created a restart of time-dependent forgetting from this enhanced recall level. Critically, the forgetting after restudy was indistinguishable from the forgetting after study, suggesting that restudy induced a reset of recall for the not restudied items. The results are consistent with the idea that restudy reactivates the temporal context during study, thus facilitating recall of the not restudied items. In particular, the findings suggest that such context updating reflects a lasting effect that entails a restart of the original time-dependent forgetting. Results are discussed with respect to recent, similar findings on effects of time-lagged selective retrieval.

摘要

随着学习和测试之间时间的增加,对所学材料的回忆通常会受到损害。选择性复习可以通过增强不仅对已复习的材料,而且对未复习的材料的回忆来打断这种依赖时间的遗忘。在两项实验中,我们研究了这种对时间依赖遗忘的中断是否反映了对回忆表现的暂时或更持久的影响。我们分析了学习后立即和时间延迟的选择性复习后对学习项目的时间依赖遗忘。复习提高了未复习项目的回忆水平,达到了直接学习后观察到的水平,并从增强的回忆水平重新开始了时间依赖的遗忘。关键是,复习后的遗忘与学习后的遗忘无法区分,这表明复习引起了未复习项目的回忆重置。结果与复习重新激活学习期间的时间背景的观点一致,从而促进了未复习项目的回忆。特别是,这些发现表明,这种上下文更新反映了一种持久的影响,需要重新开始原始的时间依赖遗忘。结果与最近关于时间延迟选择性检索影响的类似发现进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4fb/9722892/2180dc365eae/13423_2022_2131_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4fb/9722892/9d9a278e1d02/13423_2022_2131_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4fb/9722892/2180dc365eae/13423_2022_2131_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4fb/9722892/9d9a278e1d02/13423_2022_2131_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4fb/9722892/2180dc365eae/13423_2022_2131_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Selective restudy can reset recall of forgotten information.选择性复习可以重置对遗忘信息的回忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2202-2210. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02131-y. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
2
Selective memory retrieval can revive forgotten memories.选择性记忆检索可以唤起被遗忘的记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114377119.
3
Retrieval-induced forgetting: dynamic effects between retrieval and restudy trials when practice is mixed.提取诱发遗忘:练习混合时提取和重学试验之间的动态效应。
Mem Cognit. 2013 May;41(4):547-57. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0282-5.
4
Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting.检索练习可以使项目免受列表内干扰:来自列表长度效应、输出干扰和检索诱发遗忘的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):202-14. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000172. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect.选择性记忆提取的两面性:有害效应而非有益效应的回忆特异性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):246-53. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000008. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
6
Initial retrieval shields against retrieval-induced forgetting.初始检索可防止检索诱导遗忘。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 21;6:657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00657. eCollection 2015.
7
Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.检索练习可以消除列表法指导下的遗忘。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jan;44(1):15-23. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0539-x.
8
Oscillatory Correlates of Selective Restudy.选择性重新学习的振荡关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 11;15:679823. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.679823. eCollection 2021.
9
Relearning can eliminate the effect of retrieval-induced forgetting.重新学习可以消除提取诱发遗忘的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1725-1736. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01601-7. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.睡眠会降低测试效应:它能增强对再次学习项目的回忆,但对已检索项目的回忆没有影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1568-81. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000025. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
To-be-forgotten information shows more relative forgetting over time than to-be-remembered information.待遗忘信息的相对遗忘速度比待记忆信息快。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):156-165. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02330-1. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Temporal attention affects contrast response function by response gain.时间注意力通过响应增益影响对比度响应函数。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jan 25;16:1020260. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1020260. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective memory retrieval can revive forgotten memories.选择性记忆检索可以唤起被遗忘的记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114377119.
2
How delay influences search processes at test.测试中延迟如何影响搜索过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Dec;45(12):2174-2187. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000701. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
3
Human Episodic Memory Retrieval Is Accompanied by a Neural Contiguity Effect.人类情景记忆提取伴随着神经连续性效应。
J Neurosci. 2018 Apr 25;38(17):4200-4211. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2312-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
The Consolidation and Transformation of Memory.记忆的巩固与转化。
Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.004.
5
The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect.选择性记忆提取的两面性:有害效应而非有益效应的回忆特异性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):246-53. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000008. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
6
Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.提取诱发遗忘:再探竞争性干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1433-48. doi: 10.1037/a0032975. Epub 2013 May 20.
7
Contextual Variability in Free Recall.自由回忆中的情境变异性。
J Mem Lang. 2011 Apr 1;64(3):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.003.
8
Remembering to forget: the amnesic effect of daydreaming.记住与遗忘:白日梦的健忘效应。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):1036-42. doi: 10.1177/0956797610374739. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
9
Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.线索强度作为测试效应的调节者:精细提取的益处。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1563-9. doi: 10.1037/a0017021.
10
Memory search and the neural representation of context.记忆搜索与情境的神经表征
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jan;12(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Dec 19.