• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症的生物力学比较:有限元分析。

Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Xicheng District, Beijing, 101100, China.

Department of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, 067000, Hebei, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 17;23(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05543-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05543-y
PMID:35715775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9204899/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common disease among elderly individuals, and surgery is an effective treatment. The development of minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as the lumbar interspinous process device (IPD), has provided patients with more surgical options.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the biomechanical properties of different IPDs, including BacFuse, X-Stop and Coflex, in the treatment of LSS.

METHODS

Based on the computed tomography images of a patient with LSS, four finite element (FE) models of L3-S5 were created in this study. The FE models included a surgical model of the intact lumbar spine and surgical models of the lumbar IPDs BacFuse, X-Stop, and Coflex. After validating the models, they were simulated for four physiological motions: flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, and range of motion (ROM). Stress distribution of discs and facet joints in each segment, stress distribution of the spinous process in the operated section, and stress distribution of the internal fixation were compared and analysed.

RESULTS

Compared to the model of the intact lumbar spine, the other three models showed a decrease in ROM and disc and facet joint stresses in the surgical segment during movement and an increase in ROM and disc and facet joint stresses in the adjacent segments. These effects were greater for the proximal adjacent segment with BacFuse and more pronounced for the distal adjacent segment with Coflex, while X-Stop had the greatest stress effect on the spinous process in the surgical segment.

CONCLUSION

BacFuse, Coflex and X-Stop could all be implemented to effectively reduce extension and disc and facet joint stresses, but they also increase the ROM and disc and facet joint stresses in adjacent segments, which may cause degeneration.

摘要

背景

腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是老年人的常见病,手术是一种有效的治疗方法。微创外科技术的发展,如腰椎棘突间装置(IPD),为患者提供了更多的手术选择。

目的

研究不同的 IPD(BacFuse、X-Stop 和 Coflex)在治疗 LSS 中的生物力学特性。

方法

基于一位 LSS 患者的 CT 图像,本研究建立了 L3-S5 的四个有限元(FE)模型。FE 模型包括完整腰椎的手术模型和腰椎 IPD 的手术模型 BacFuse、X-Stop 和 Coflex。在验证模型后,对其进行了四个生理运动(前屈、伸展、侧屈和轴向旋转)和运动范围(ROM)的模拟。比较和分析了每个节段椎间盘和小关节的应力分布、手术节段棘突的应力分布以及内固定的应力分布。

结果

与完整腰椎模型相比,其他三个模型在运动过程中手术节段的 ROM 和椎间盘及小关节的应力减小,而相邻节段的 ROM 和椎间盘及小关节的应力增加。BacFuse 对近端相邻节段的影响更大,Coflex 对远端相邻节段的影响更明显,而 X-Stop 对手术节段棘突的应力影响最大。

结论

BacFuse、Coflex 和 X-Stop 都可以有效地减少伸展和椎间盘及小关节的应力,但也会增加相邻节段的 ROM 和椎间盘及小关节的应力,这可能导致退化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/25b49dec5f30/12891_2022_5543_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/96638138f79c/12891_2022_5543_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/cb093de90836/12891_2022_5543_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/62145fdc31dc/12891_2022_5543_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/97f8a75a3224/12891_2022_5543_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/e9c8ea995917/12891_2022_5543_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/25b49dec5f30/12891_2022_5543_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/96638138f79c/12891_2022_5543_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/cb093de90836/12891_2022_5543_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/62145fdc31dc/12891_2022_5543_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/97f8a75a3224/12891_2022_5543_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/e9c8ea995917/12891_2022_5543_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34df/9204899/25b49dec5f30/12891_2022_5543_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.不同棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症的生物力学比较:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 17;23(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05543-y.
2
Oblique lateral interbody fusion with internal fixations in the treatment for cross-segment degenerative lumbar spine disease (L2-3 and L4-5) finite element analysis.斜外侧椎间融合联合内固定治疗节段性退变性腰椎疾病(L2-3和L4-5)的有限元分析
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43399-x.
3
Biomechanical characteristics of a novel interspinous distraction fusion device in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a finite element analysis.新型棘突间撑开融合装置治疗腰椎退变性疾病的生物力学特性:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Dec 6;24(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07066-6.
4
Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.不同腰椎棘突间装置的生物力学分析:一项有限元研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e1112-e1119. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.051. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)与 Coflex-F 及椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学评价:静态和振动条件下的有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):2339-2349. doi: 10.1111/os.13425. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Biomechanical effect of bone resorption of the spinous process after single-segment interspinous dynamic stabilization device implantation: A finite element analysis.单节段棘突间动态稳定装置植入后棘突骨吸收的生物力学效应:有限元分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(27):e11140. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011140.
7
Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.棘突间装置与刚性固定对腰椎相邻节段活动度影响的生物力学比较
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(5):404-9.
8
Interlaminar stabilization offers greater biomechanical advantage compared to interspinous stabilization after lumbar decompression: a finite element analysis.与腰椎减压术后棘突间固定相比,板间稳定提供了更大的生物力学优势:有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jul 29;15(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01812-5.
9
Effects of dynamic and rigid implantation on biomechanical characteristics of different sagittal alignment lumbar after single- or double-level spinal fixations: a finite-element modeling study.动态和刚性植入物对单节段和双节段脊柱固定后不同矢状位腰椎生物力学特征的影响:一项有限元建模研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Dec 11;28(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01475-y.
10
Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.腰椎经皮椎弓根固定术中上段双侧关节突关节破坏:严重破坏的生物力学研究 第三部分
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):E508-E514. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003327.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical efficacy and radiological findings of interspinous dynamic stabilization system versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.棘突间动态稳定系统与单侧双孔椎间孔镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 29;20(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05859-0.
2
Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Microdiscectomy, Interspinous Device Implantation, and Full-Endoscopic Discectomy for Simple Lumbar Disc Herniation.单纯腰椎间盘突出症的显微椎间盘切除术、棘突间装置植入术和全内镜下椎间盘切除术的临床疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 13;14(6):1925. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061925.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Real world adverse events of interspinous spacers using Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience data.利用制造商和用户设施设备经验数据得出的棘突间撑开器的真实世界不良事件
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Apr;16(2):177-183. doi: 10.17085/apm.20093. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
[Clinical observation of transforaminal endoscopy combined with interspinous fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with instability in the elderly].经椎间孔内镜联合棘突间融合术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症伴腰椎不稳的临床观察
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Mar 25;34(3):249-54. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.03.012.
3
Effect of different designs of interspinous process devices on the instrumented and adjacent levels after double-level lumbar decompression surgery: A finite element analysis.
Perspective: Efficacy and outcomes for different lumbar interspinous devices (ISD) vs. open surgery to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
观点:不同腰椎棘突间装置(ISD)与开放手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的疗效及结果对比
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Jan 19;15:17. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1007_2023. eCollection 2024.
4
Biomechanical characteristics of a novel interspinous distraction fusion device in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a finite element analysis.新型棘突间撑开融合装置治疗腰椎退变性疾病的生物力学特性:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Dec 6;24(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07066-6.
5
Comparative Effects and Safety of Full-Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Spinal Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Statistical Power Analysis of 6 Randomized Controlled Trials.全内镜与显微镜下腰椎管减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较效果与安全性:6项随机对照试验的Meta分析和统计效能分析
Neurospine. 2022 Dec;19(4):996-1005. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244600.300. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
双节段腰椎减压术后不同棘突间装置设计对节段内和相邻节段的影响:有限元分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244571. eCollection 2020.
4
A new interspinous process distraction device BacFuse in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with 5 years follow-up study.一种新型棘突间撑开装置BacFuse治疗腰椎管狭窄症的5年随访研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 26;99(26):e20925. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020925.
5
Decompression Surgery versus Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.减压手术与棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症:文献系统综述
Asian Spine J. 2020 Aug;14(4):526-542. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0105. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis.微创腰椎减压术后应用棘突间装置可导致椎弓峡部的应力重新分布:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 15;20(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2565-5.
7
A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Adjacent Segment Disk Degeneration Induced by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion After Pedicle Screw Fixation.椎弓根螺钉固定后经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术致相邻节段椎间盘退变的三维有限元分析
World Neurosurg. 2019 Apr;124:e51-e57. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.195. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses.三种不同腰椎椎间融合术方式对椎弓根螺钉固定系统内应力影响的比较:有限元静态与振动分析。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Mar;35(3):e3162. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3162. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Comparative effectiveness and safety of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Coflex, Wallis, and X-stop for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.后路腰椎椎间融合术、Coflex、Wallis和X-stop治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;172:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
10
Finite element analysis and design of an interspinous device using topology optimization.基于拓扑优化的棘突间装置的有限元分析与设计。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Jan;57(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1838-8. Epub 2018 Jul 7.