Suppr超能文献

疫情下的“无悔”购买:充分利用提前购买协议。

"No Regrets" Purchasing in a pandemic: making the most of advance purchase agreements.

机构信息

UNICEF Supply Division, New York City, NY, USA.

Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.

出版信息

Global Health. 2022 Jun 17;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00851-3.

Abstract

"No regrets" buying - using Advance Purchase Agreements (APAs) - has characterized the response to recent pandemics such as Avian flu, Zika Virus, and now COVID-19. APAs are used to reduce demand uncertainty for product developers and manufacturers; to hedge against R&D and manufacturing risks; and to secure availability of products in the face of spiking demand. Evidence on the use of APAs to buy vaccines, medicines, diagnostics, and personal protective equipment during recent pandemics illustrates how these contracts can achieve their intended objectives for buyers. But, transferring risk from suppliers to buyers - as APAs do - can have consequences, including overbuying and overpaying. Furthermore, the widespread use of APAs by high-income countries has contributed to the striking inequities that have characterized the Swine flu and COVID-19 responses, delaying access to vaccines and other supplies for low- and middle-income countries (L&MICs).We identify seven ways to address some of the risks and disadvantages of APAs, including adoption of a global framework governing how countries enter into APAs and share any resulting supplies; voluntary pooling through joint or coordinated APAs; a concessional-capital-backed facility to allow international buyers and L&MICs to place options on products as an alternative to full purchase commitments; greater collection and sharing of market information to help buyers place smarter APAs; support for a resale market; building in mechanisms for donation from the outset; and transitioning away from APAs as markets mature. While a binding global framework could in theory prevent the competitive buying and hoarding that have characterized country/state responses to pandemics, it will be very challenging to put in place. The other solutions, while less sweeping, can nonetheless mitigate both the inequities associated with the current uncoordinated use of APAs and also some of the risks to individual buyers.Analysis of recent experiences can provide useful lessons on APAs for the next pandemic. It will be important to keep in mind, however, that these contractual instruments work by transferring risk to the buyer, and that buyers must therefore accept the consequences. In the spirit of "no regrets" purchasing, having bought what hindsight suggests was too much is generally preferable to having bought not enough.

摘要

“不后悔”购买——使用预先采购协议(APAs)——是应对最近几次大流行(如禽流感、寨卡病毒和现在的 COVID-19)的特点。APAs 用于减少产品开发商和制造商的需求不确定性;对冲研发和制造风险;并确保在需求激增的情况下产品的供应。最近大流行期间使用 APAs 购买疫苗、药品、诊断试剂和个人防护设备的证据表明,这些合同如何能够为买家实现其预期目标。但是,将风险从供应商转移到买家——正如 APAs 所做的那样——可能会带来后果,包括过度购买和过度支付。此外,高收入国家广泛使用 APAs 导致了猪流感和 COVID-19 应对措施中明显的不平等现象,延迟了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)获得疫苗和其他供应品的机会。我们确定了七种方法来解决 APAs 的一些风险和缺点,包括通过一个全球框架来规范各国如何签订 APAs 并分享任何由此产生的供应品;通过联合或协调的 APAs 进行自愿集中;一个优惠资本支持的设施,允许国际买家和 LMICs 对产品进行期权,而不是全额购买承诺;更好地收集和共享市场信息,帮助买家更明智地签订 APAs;支持转售市场;从一开始就建立捐赠机制;随着市场成熟逐步退出 APAs。虽然理论上具有约束力的全球框架可以防止国家/州对大流行的竞争性购买和囤积,但实际实施将非常具有挑战性。其他解决方案虽然影响较小,但可以减轻当前不协调使用 APAs 相关的不平等现象,以及对个别买家的一些风险。对最近经验的分析可以为下一次大流行提供有关 APAs 的有用教训。然而,必须牢记的是,这些合同工具通过将风险转移给买家来发挥作用,因此买家必须接受后果。本着“不后悔”购买的精神,购买事后看来过多的东西通常比购买不足要好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/153e/9204978/18bf5f5db83f/12992_2022_851_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验