Suppr超能文献

共情、系统、共情-系统差异及其与自闭症谱系障碍儿童(伴或不伴智力障碍)自闭症特征的关系。

Empathizing, systemizing, empathizing-systemizing difference and their association with autistic traits in children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability.

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2022 Jul;15(7):1348-1357. doi: 10.1002/aur.2766. Epub 2022 Jun 19.

Abstract

Empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference can be linked to autistic traits in the general adult population and those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but these profiles and associations remain unclear in children with ASD, with and without intellectual disability (ASD + ID; ASD-noID). We recruited three groups including 160 boys with ASD (73 ASD + ID; 87 ASD-noID) and 99 typically developing (TD) boys (6-12 years). We measured empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference using the parent-reported child Empathy and Systemizing Quotient (EQ-C/SQ-C). We measured autistic traits using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Among the three groups, children with ASD + ID and ASD-noID scored lower on the EQ-C and SQ-C than TD children (all p < 0.001). There was no difference in the EQ-C between children with ASD + ID and ASD-noID (16.59 ± 5.53 vs. 16.23 ± 5.85, p = 0.973), and the difference in the SQ-C attenuated to null when adjusting for intelligence between children with ASD-noID and TD children (18.89 ± 7.80 vs. 24.15 ± 6.73, p = 0.089). Children with ASD + ID scored higher on empathizing-systemizing difference than TD children but lower than children with ASD-noID (all p < 0.05). Negative associations between EQ-C and all autistic traits, null associations between SQ-C and all autistic traits, and positive associations between empathizing-systemizing difference and all autistic traits were found in all groups. We observed differences in empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference and the consistency of their associations with autistic traits among the three groups. Our findings provide implication that behavioral interventions of ASD should consider the balance of empathizing and systemizing. LAY SUMMARY: We examined the profiles of empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference in children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability (ASD + ID; ASD-noID), and typically developing (TD) children aged 6-12 years. We observed differences in these profiles and the consistency of their associations with autistic traits among the three groups. Empathizing and empathizing-systemizing difference, rather than systemizing, were associated with autistic traits within the three groups. Our findings provide implication that behavioral interventions of ASD should consider these imbalance profiles.

摘要

共情、系统和共情-系统差异与普通成年人群体以及自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的自闭症特征有关,但这些特征和关联在 ASD 伴有和不伴有智力障碍(ASD+ID;ASD-noID)的儿童中仍不清楚。我们招募了三组参与者,包括 160 名患有 ASD 的男孩(73 名 ASD+ID;87 名 ASD-noID)和 99 名正常发育的(TD)男孩(6-12 岁)。我们使用父母报告的儿童共情和系统量化问卷(EQ-C/SQ-C)测量共情、系统和共情-系统差异。我们使用社会反应量表(SRS)测量自闭症特征。在这三组中,ASD+ID 和 ASD-noID 组的儿童在 EQ-C 和 SQ-C 上的得分均低于 TD 组儿童(均 p<0.001)。ASD+ID 组和 ASD-noID 组儿童的 EQ-C 得分没有差异(16.59±5.53 vs. 16.23±5.85,p=0.973),当调整智力后,ASD-noID 组儿童和 TD 组儿童的 SQ-C 差异减弱至无统计学意义(18.89±7.80 vs. 24.15±6.73,p=0.089)。ASD+ID 组儿童的共情-系统差异得分高于 TD 组儿童,但低于 ASD-noID 组儿童(均 p<0.05)。在所有组中,我们都发现 EQ-C 与所有自闭症特征呈负相关,SQ-C 与所有自闭症特征呈零相关,共情-系统差异与所有自闭症特征呈正相关。我们观察到三组之间在共情、系统和共情-系统差异以及它们与自闭症特征的关联一致性方面存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,ASD 的行为干预应该考虑共情和系统之间的平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验