Suppr超能文献

在内镜经乳头胆囊支架置入术治疗急性胆囊炎中使用切割鼻胆管制成的单猪尾支架的可行性

Feasibility of a Single Pigtail Stent Made by Cutting a Nasobiliary Drainage Tube in Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Stenting for Acute Cholecystitis.

作者信息

Takahashi Koji, Ohyama Hiroshi, Ouchi Mayu, Kan Motoyasu, Nagashima Hiroki, Iino Yotaro, Kusakabe Yuko, Okitsu Kohichiroh, Ohno Izumi, Takiguchi Yuichi, Kato Naoya

机构信息

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Medical Oncology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 May 17;14(5):e25072. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25072. eCollection 2022 May.

Abstract

Background and objective In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single pigtail stent made by cutting a nasobiliary drainage tube (NBD stent) by comparing the clinical outcomes of using an NBD stent and those of using a ready-made double pigtail stent (RDP stent) in endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) for acute cholecystitis. Materials and methods This was a single-center retrospective study involving 20 cases that had technical success with EGBS for acute cholecystitis; the patients were divided into two groups: those using NBD stent (NBD group) and those using RDP stent (RDP group). The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results There were 13 patients in the NBD group and seven in the RDP group. The rates of clinical success (NBD group: 92% vs. RDP group: 100%, p=0.45) did not differ significantly between the groups. Regarding adverse events, gallbladder perforation occurred in one case in the NBD group; however, no other adverse events occurred in either group (NBD group: 7.7% vs. RDP group: 0%, p=0.45). The stent patency periods did not differ significantly between the groups [NBD group: 43 (12-64) days vs. RDP group: 97 (58-215) days, p=0.17]. The stent patency period in cases of long-term stent placement after EGBS was 1,381 days and 1,579 days in the NBD group and 305 days in the RDP group, respectively. Conclusion NBD stents are considered as effective as RDP stents in EGBS for acute cholecystitis. They are highly versatile and can be used for both bridging to surgery and long-term stent placement.

摘要

背景与目的 在本研究中,我们旨在通过比较鼻胆管引流管制成的单猪尾支架(NBD支架)与成品双猪尾支架(RDP支架)在急性胆囊炎内镜下胆囊支架置入术(EGBS)中的临床疗效,评估其有效性和安全性。材料与方法 这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入20例急性胆囊炎EGBS技术成功的患者;患者分为两组:使用NBD支架的患者(NBD组)和使用RDP支架的患者(RDP组)。比较两组的基线特征和临床疗效。结果 NBD组有13例患者,RDP组有7例患者。两组的临床成功率(NBD组:92% vs. RDP组:100%,p = 0.45)无显著差异。关于不良事件,NBD组有1例发生胆囊穿孔;然而,两组均未发生其他不良事件(NBD组:7.7% vs. RDP组:0%,p = 0.45)。两组的支架通畅期无显著差异[NBD组:43(12 - 64)天 vs. RDP组:97(58 - 215)天,p = 0.17]。EGBS后长期放置支架的病例中,NBD组的支架通畅期分别为1381天和1579天,RDP组为305天。结论 在急性胆囊炎的EGBS中,NBD支架被认为与RDP支架一样有效。它们具有高度的通用性,可用于过渡到手术和长期支架置入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66b/9202489/a4e6a5926d1c/cureus-0014-00000025072-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验