Suppr超能文献

不同样本中的重测效应:社会人口学预测因素及可能的校正方法。

Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches.

作者信息

Bertola Laiss, Benseñor Isabela Judith Martins, Brunoni Andre Russowsky, Caramelli Paulo, Barreto Sandhi Maria, Moreno Arlinda Barbosa, Griep Rosane Harter, Viana Maria Carmen, Lotufo Paulo Andrade, Suemoto Claudia Kimie

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital Universitário, Centro de Pesquisa Epidemiológica e Clínica, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Dement Neuropsychol. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):171-180. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up.

METHODS

We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index.

RESULTS

We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores.

摘要

未标注

在纵向研究中重复进行认知评估有利于重测效应的出现,与基线相比,通常会提高随访评估时获得的分数。因此,重测效应可能会影响对老年人认知衰退的评估。

目的

我们旨在验证重测效应的出现以及社会人口学特征对5592名具有不同社会人口学特征的参与者随访分数的影响,这些参与者在4年的随访期间接受了两次评估。

方法

我们测试了两种纠正重测效应的可能方法,并计算了可靠变化指数。

结果

我们观察到4年后随访评估时分数有所提高,但结果表明重测效应的出现程度较小。回归差异校正成功生成了随访校正分数,而平均差异未能提供有效的校正。社会人口学特征对重测的影响较小。

结论

我们建议对重测效应采用回归差异校正。缺乏这种方法可能会导致使用纵向认知分数得出有偏差的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验