• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合差距:通过构建包含德尔菲技术的Q样本,利用共识探索基于能力的急诊医学住院医师培训项目中的委托决策和反馈接受度。

Bridging the Gap: Using Consensus to Explore Entrustment Decisions and Feedback Receptivity in Competency-Based Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Through the Construction of a Q-Sample Incorporating a Delphi Technique.

作者信息

Chang Yu-Che, Chuang Renee S, Hsiao Cheng-Ting, Khwepeya Madalitso, Nkambule Nothando S

机构信息

Chang Gung Medical Education Research Centre (CG-MERC), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 2;9:879271. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.879271. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.879271
PMID:35721074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9201255/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent changes in medical education calls for a shift toward student-centered learning. Therefore, it is imperative that clinical educators transparently assess the work-readiness of their medical residents through entrustment-based supervision decisions toward independent practice. Similarly, it is critical that medical residents are vocal about the quality of supervision and feedback they receive. This study aimed to explore the factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity by establishing a general consensus among Taiwanese clinical educators and medical residents regarding entrustment decisions and feedback uptake, respectively.

METHODS

In Q-methodology studies, a set of opinion statement (i.e., the Q-sample) is generated to represent the phenomenon of interest. To explore the factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity, a Q-sample was developed using a four-step approach: (1) literature search using electronic databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, and interviews with emergency clinical educators and medical residents to generate opinion statements, (2) thematic analysis and grouping using The Model of Trust, the Ready, Wiling, and Able model, and the theory of self-regulated learning, (3) translation, and (4) application of a Delphi technique, including two expert panels comprised of clinical educators and medical residents, to establish a consensus of the statements and validation for a subsequent Q-study.

RESULTS

A total of 585 and 1,039 statements from the literature search and interviews were extracted to populate the sample of statements (i.e., the concourse) regarding entrustment-based supervision decisions for clinical educators and feedback receptivity emergency medicine residents, respectively. Two expert panels were invited to participate in a Delphi Technique, comprised of 11 clinical educators and 13 medical residents. After two-rounds of a Delphi technique, the panel of clinical educators agreed on 54 statements on factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and were categorized into five themes defined by the Model of Trust. Similarly, a total of 60 statements on the factors that influence feedback receptivity were retained by the panel of medical residents and were categorized into five themes defined by the Ready, Willing, and Able model and the theory of self-regulated learning.

CONCLUSION

Though not exhaustive, the key factors agreed upon by clinical educators and medical residents reflect the characteristics of entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity across specialties. This study provides insight on an often overlooked issue of the paths to teaching and learning in competency-based residency training programs. Additionally, incorporation of the Delphi technique further adds to the existing literature and puts emphasis as an important tool that can be used in medical education to rigorously validate Q-statements and develop Q-samples in various specialties.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/5977c0ce6d86/fmed-09-879271-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/dc93ac155186/fmed-09-879271-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/424e8384fdb2/fmed-09-879271-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/881c72cbf3ac/fmed-09-879271-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/5977c0ce6d86/fmed-09-879271-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/dc93ac155186/fmed-09-879271-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/424e8384fdb2/fmed-09-879271-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/881c72cbf3ac/fmed-09-879271-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b1/9201255/5977c0ce6d86/fmed-09-879271-g0004.jpg
摘要

背景

医学教育最近的变革要求向以学生为中心的学习转变。因此,临床教育工作者必须通过基于委托的监督决策来透明地评估其住院医师的工作准备情况,以实现独立执业。同样,住院医师积极表达他们所接受的监督和反馈的质量也至关重要。本研究旨在通过分别在台湾临床教育工作者和住院医师中就委托决策和反馈接受度达成普遍共识,探讨影响基于委托的监督决策和反馈接受度的因素。

方法

在Q方法研究中,生成一组意见陈述(即Q样本)来代表感兴趣的现象。为了探讨影响基于委托的监督决策和反馈接受度的因素,采用四步法开发了一个Q样本:(1)使用电子数据库(如PubMed和谷歌学术)进行文献检索,并对急诊临床教育工作者和住院医师进行访谈以生成意见陈述;(2)使用信任模型、准备好、愿意且有能力模型和自我调节学习理论进行主题分析和分组;(3)翻译;(4)应用德尔菲技术,包括由临床教育工作者和住院医师组成的两个专家小组,以就陈述达成共识并为后续的Q研究进行验证。

结果

分别从文献检索和访谈中提取了585条和1039条陈述,以构成关于临床教育工作者基于委托的监督决策和急诊医学住院医师反馈接受度的陈述样本(即全集)。邀请了两个专家小组参与德尔菲技术,其中一个由11名临床教育工作者组成,另一个由13名住院医师组成。经过两轮德尔菲技术,临床教育工作者小组就影响基于委托的监督决策的因素达成了54条陈述,并根据信任模型分为五个主题。同样,住院医师小组保留了总共60条关于影响反馈接受度的因素的陈述,并根据准备好、愿意且有能力模型和自我调节学习理论分为五个主题。

结论

尽管并不详尽,但临床教育工作者和住院医师达成共识的关键因素反映了各专业基于委托的监督决策和反馈接受度的特点。本研究为基于能力的住院医师培训项目中一个经常被忽视的教学与学习路径问题提供了见解。此外,德尔菲技术的纳入进一步丰富了现有文献,并强调其作为医学教育中一种重要工具的作用,可用于严格验证Q陈述并在各个专业中开发Q样本。

相似文献

1
Bridging the Gap: Using Consensus to Explore Entrustment Decisions and Feedback Receptivity in Competency-Based Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Through the Construction of a Q-Sample Incorporating a Delphi Technique.弥合差距:通过构建包含德尔菲技术的Q样本,利用共识探索基于能力的急诊医学住院医师培训项目中的委托决策和反馈接受度。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 2;9:879271. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.879271. eCollection 2022.
2
Q sample construction: a novel approach incorporating a Delphi technique to explore opinions about codeine dependence.Q 样本构建:一种新方法,结合德尔菲技术探索对可待因依赖的看法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 14;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0741-9.
3
Entrustment Checkpoint: Clinical Supervisors' Perceptions of the Emergency Department Oral Case Presentation.委托检查点:临床主管对急诊科口头病例汇报的看法。
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Jun-Jul;31(3):250-257. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1551139. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
4
Consensus-based statements for assessing clinical competency in podiatry-related work integrated learning.基于共识的评估足病相关工作综合学习临床能力的陈述。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jul 19;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00639-7.
5
Residents as supervisors: How senior residents make ad hoc entrustment decisions.住院医师担任带教老师:高年资住院医师如何做出临时委托决策。
Med Educ. 2023 Aug;57(8):723-731. doi: 10.1111/medu.15017. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Beyond hands-on and hands-off: supervisory approaches and entrustment on the inpatient ward.超越动手与放手:住院病房的监管方法和委托
Med Educ. 2018 Oct;52(10):1028-1040. doi: 10.1111/medu.13621. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
The impact of entrustment assessments on feedback and learning: Trainee perspectives.委托评估对反馈和学习的影响:学员视角。
Med Educ. 2020 Apr;54(4):328-336. doi: 10.1111/medu.14047. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
8
A case for feedback and monitoring assessment in competency-based medical education.基于能力的医学教育中反馈和监测评估的案例。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;26(4):1105-1113. doi: 10.1111/jep.13338. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
How Entrustment Is Informed by Holistic Judgments Across Time in a Family Medicine Residency Program: An Ethnographic Nonparticipant Observational Study.在家庭医学住院医师培训项目中,委托如何通过跨时间的整体判断来确定:一项民族志非参与观察性研究。
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):792-799. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001464.
10
How Clinical Supervisors Conceptualize Procedural Entrustment: An Interview-Based Study of Entrustment Decision Making in Endoscopic Training.临床指导者如何概念化程序性委托:内镜培训中委托决策的基于访谈的研究。
Acad Med. 2022 Apr 1;97(4):586-592. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004566.

本文引用的文献

1
"Glocalization" in medical education: A framework underlying implementing CBME in a local context.医学教育中的“本土化全球化”:在本土环境中实施 CBME 的框架。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Aug;121(8):1523-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
2
Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review.促进和阻碍工作场所有效临床监督的因素:快速证据回顾。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 28;11(9):e052929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052929.
3
Programmatic Assessment: The Secret Sauce of Effective CBME Implementation.
程序化评估:有效实施基于能力的医学教育(CBME)的秘诀
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Aug;12(4):518-521. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00702.1.
4
Shared Mental Models Among Clinical Competency Committees in the Context of Time-Variable, Competency-Based Advancement to Residency.在基于时间变化的、以能力为基础的住院医师晋升的背景下,临床能力委员会之间的共享心理模型。
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations):S95-S102. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003638.
5
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of competency-based medical education in anaesthesia.基于能力的医学教育在麻醉学中的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):748-760. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.10.025. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
Fill the gap between traditional and new era: The medical educational reform in Taiwan.填补传统与新时代之间的差距:台湾的医学教育改革。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2019 Sep 16;31(4):211-216. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_229_18. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.
7
Practice to preach self-regulation: Use of metacognitive strategies by medical teachers in their learning practices.实践以宣扬自我调节:医学教师在其学习实践中使用元认知策略。
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Nov-Dec;35(6):1642-1646. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.6.550.
8
Ready, willing and able: a model to explain successful use of feedback.准备、意愿和能力:解释成功使用反馈的模型。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 May;25(2):337-361. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09924-2. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Q sample construction: a novel approach incorporating a Delphi technique to explore opinions about codeine dependence.Q 样本构建:一种新方法,结合德尔菲技术探索对可待因依赖的看法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 14;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0741-9.
10
Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.临床绩效反馈干预理论(CP-FIT):基于系统评价和定性研究的元综合,为医疗保健中设计、实施和评估反馈而提出的一个新理论。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 26;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5.