Suppr超能文献

上海区域医疗中心GeneXpert MTB/RIF与传统方法联合用于结核病诊断的回顾性研究

GeneXpert MTB/RIF combined with conventional methods for tuberculosis in Shanghai Regional Medical Center: a retrospective diagnostic study.

作者信息

Zhang Huanhuan, Li Hong, Tan Meiyu, Liu Zhenhao, Gu Jie, Zhang Yi, Sheng Huiming

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Institute for Genome and Bioinformatics, Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2022 May;10(10):575. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1374.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is still challenging, and improving the efficiency of diagnosis can help prevent and control TB. This retrospective clinical study aimed to assess the diagnostic efficiency of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary TB.

METHODS

A total of 620 newly-diagnosed patients who visited the pulmonary clinic of Shanghai Tongren Hospital between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled in the study. All 620 patients had acid-fast Bacilli (AFB) identified by Ziehl Neelsen staining (ZNS) test, BECTEC MGIT 960 liquid culture (LC), and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (GX). A total of 53 patients also underwent interferon-γ release assay (IGRA). The diagnostic efficacy of ZNS, LC, GX alone or in combination in pulmonary TB was evaluated, with clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. Moreover, the IGRA for pulmonary TB diagnosis was preliminarily assessed.

RESULTS

Eventually, 185 cases were clinically confirmed (which included 36 etiologically negative cases) in the total enrolled 620 first-diagnosed patients. Overall, the 3 methods ZNS, LC, and GX showed sensitivities of 55.68%, 64.32%, and 68.64%, specificities of 98.39%, 95.40%, and 99.08%, positive predictive values (PPV) of 93.64%, 85.61%, and 96.95%, and negative predictive values (NPV) of 83.92%, 86.28%, and 88.14%, respectively. The GX method showed the highest specificity and PPV for a solitary single method, with 99.08% and 96.95%, respectively. Regarding pairwise combination methods, all showed superior sensitivity to a single test, reaching a maximum of 80.00%. Among them, the LC + GX combination showed both the highest sensitivity (80.00%) and NPV (91.78%), and the corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.875) was the largest. Among the 53 patients who underwent IGRA testing, 42 were positive (including 4 etiologically negative cases), and 11 were negative. The overall sensitivity of IGRA for diagnosing pulmonary TB was 90.00%, specificity was 27.27%, PPV was 42.86%, and NPV was 81.82%.

CONCLUSIONS

The GX method shows promise as a first-line diagnostic method for pulmonary TB. Furthermore, the sensitivity was significantly improved when combined with LC. This combination will screen out some etiologically negative patients plus IGRA, so their combination is recommended for practice optimization.

摘要

背景

目前,结核病(TB)的诊断仍具有挑战性,提高诊断效率有助于结核病的防控。这项回顾性临床研究旨在评估GeneXpert MTB/RIF对肺结核的诊断效率。

方法

本研究纳入了2018年至2021年间在上海同仁医院肺科门诊就诊的620例新诊断患者。所有620例患者均通过萋-尼氏染色(ZNS)试验、BACTEC MGIT 960液体培养(LC)和GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测(GX)鉴定出抗酸杆菌(AFB)。共有53例患者还接受了γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRA)。以临床诊断为金标准,评估ZNS、LC、GX单独或联合应用于肺结核的诊断效能。此外,还对IGRA用于肺结核诊断进行了初步评估。

结果

最终,在纳入研究的620例初诊患者中,有185例得到临床确诊(其中包括36例病因学阴性病例)。总体而言,ZNS、LC和GX这三种方法的敏感性分别为55.68%、64.32%和68.64%,特异性分别为98.39%、95.40%和99.08%,阳性预测值(PPV)分别为93.64%、85.61%和96.95%,阴性预测值(NPV)分别为83.92%、86.28%和88.14%。GX方法作为单一方法时显示出最高的特异性和PPV,分别为99.08%和96.95%。对于两两联合方法,所有联合方法的敏感性均优于单一检测,最高达到80.00%。其中,LC + GX联合方法的敏感性(80.00%)和NPV(91.78%)均最高,相应的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(0.875)最大。在接受IGRA检测的53例患者中,42例呈阳性(包括4例病因学阴性病例),11例呈阴性。IGRA诊断肺结核的总体敏感性为90.00%,特异性为27.27%,PPV为42.86%,NPV为81.82%。

结论

GX方法有望成为肺结核的一线诊断方法。此外,与LC联合使用时敏感性显著提高。这种联合方法加上IGRA将筛查出一些病因学阴性患者,因此建议将它们联合使用以优化临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f71/9201123/dc6a7b809a3e/atm-10-10-575-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验