Suppr超能文献

基于行为的筛查问题以及使用“个性化风险评估”筛查标准导致的潜在献血损失:加拿大视角

Behaviour based screening questions and potential donation loss using the "for the assessment of individualised risk" screening criteria: A Canadian perspective.

作者信息

Caffrey Niamh, Goldman Mindy, Lewin Antoine, Osmond Lori, O'Brien Sheila F

机构信息

Donation Policy & Studies, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2022 Oct;32(5):422-427. doi: 10.1111/tme.12888. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To reduce the risk of HIV transmission through transfusion, gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) are deferred from donating blood in many countries for varying lengths of time after having sex with another man. In 2021, screening algorithms to identify high-risk sexual behaviours using gender-neutral criteria (i.e., without any question on MSM or time deferral for MSM) were implemented in the United Kingdom based on recommendations in a report from the FAIR (For the Assessment of Individualised Risk) steering group.

OBJECTIVES

This study examines the potential donation loss expected with these criteria if implemented in Canada.

METHODS

Responses from blood donors regarding engagement in behaviours such as chemsex and anal sex with a new or multiple partners within 3 months of donation were collected using an on-site paper questionnaire.

RESULTS

Applying the FAIR criteria resulted in donation loss of 1.0% (95% CI: 0.8% - 1.1%). Donation loss would be higher amongst younger donors aged 17-25 (2.0%, 95% CI: 1.6% - 2.3%). Overall, 20% of donors reported feeling uncomfortable answering study questions but only 2.0% said it would stop them from donating.

CONCLUSION

Donation loss could be compensated by newly eligible gbMSM and with increased recruitment and encouraging donation from infrequent donors.

摘要

背景

为降低通过输血传播艾滋病毒的风险,在许多国家,男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性(gbMSM)在与另一名男性发生性行为后的不同时间段内被推迟献血。2021年,英国根据公平(个体化风险评估)指导小组报告中的建议,实施了使用中性标准(即不询问任何关于男男性行为者或男男性行为者的延期时间问题)来识别高风险性行为的筛查算法。

目的

本研究探讨了这些标准若在加拿大实施可能导致的献血流失情况。

方法

使用现场纸质问卷收集献血者关于在献血前3个月内与新伴侣或多个伴侣发生诸如化学性行为和肛交等行为的回答。

结果

应用公平标准导致献血流失率为1.0%(95%置信区间:0.8% - 1.1%)。在17 - 25岁的年轻献血者中,献血流失率会更高(2.0%,95%置信区间:1.6% - 2.3%)。总体而言,20%的献血者表示回答研究问题时感到不舒服,但只有2.0%的人表示这会阻止他们献血。

结论

新符合条件的男男性行为者以及增加招募和鼓励不常献血者献血可以弥补献血流失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验