Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
Perceptions towards sex selection among Jordanian population: A survey study.
Andrologia. 2022 Oct;54(9):e14501. doi: 10.1111/and.14501. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
Characteristics of women visiting an infertility clinic and their interest in preimplantation sex selection in the north of Jordan.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Dec;165(2):271-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
3
Attitudes of graduating medical doctors toward using sex selection techniques in Jordan in 2009.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;284(1):163-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1616-9. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
5
Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences among infertility patients in Midwestern United States.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Oct;24(10):451-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-007-9157-2. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
6
Sex preference and interest in preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in the north of Jordan.
Hum Reprod. 2009 Jul;24(7):1665-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep080. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
7
Preconception sex selection: a survey of visitors to an internet-based health forum.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Mar;16 Suppl 1:18-26. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60395-1.
8
Antifungal prescribing pattern and attitude towards the treatment of oral candidiasis among dentists in Jordan.
Int Dent J. 2015 Aug;65(4):216-26. doi: 10.1111/idj.12173. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
9
Fetal sex preference of second-trimester gravidas.
J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Mar-Apr;38(2):110-3. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(93)90144-6.
10
Factors affecting medical students in formulating their specialty preferences in Jordan.
BMC Med Educ. 2008 May 23;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-32.

本文引用的文献

1
State-Mandated Insurance Coverage and Preimplantation Genetic Testing in the United States.
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr 1;139(4):500-508. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004712. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jul 2;14:2797-2801. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S306124. eCollection 2021.
3
Disparities among infertility patients regarding genetic carrier screening, sex selection, and gene editing.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Sep;38(9):2319-2325. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02261-7. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Mar;40(4):398-407. doi: 10.1002/pd.5555. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
High and growing disapproval of sex-selection technology in Australia.
Reprod Health. 2018 Sep 6;15(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0577-5.
7
Parents' Preferences for Sex of Children in Sweden: Attitudes and Outcomes.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2018;37(3):443-459. doi: 10.1007/s11113-018-9462-8. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
8
Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Mar;15(1):123-137. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9835-4. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Mar;35(3):409-416. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1076-2. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
10
Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among obstetricians in Pakistan, a developing, Islamic country.
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Mar;37(3):289-295. doi: 10.1002/pd.5008. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验