Suppr超能文献

多中心研究种族和民族在肝移植评估中的不平等:了解机制和确定解决方案。

Multicenter study of racial and ethnic inequities in liver transplantation evaluation: Understanding mechanisms and identifying solutions.

机构信息

Department of MedicineSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA.

Malone Center for Engineering in HealthcareWhiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2022 Dec;28(12):1841-1856. doi: 10.1002/lt.26532. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Abstract

Racial and ethnic disparities persist in access to the liver transplantation (LT) waiting list; however, there is limited knowledge about underlying system-level factors that may be responsible for these disparities. Given the complex nature of LT candidate evaluation, a human factors and systems engineering approach may provide insights. We recruited participants from the LT teams (coordinators, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers, dieticians, pharmacists, leadership) at two major LT centers. From December 2020 to July 2021, we performed ethnographic observations (participant-patient appointments, committee meetings) and semistructured interviews (N = 54 interviews, 49 observation hours). Based on findings from this multicenter, multimethod qualitative study combined with the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 (a human factors and systems engineering model for health care), we created a conceptual framework describing how transplant work system characteristics and other external factors may improve equity in the LT evaluation process. Participant perceptions about listing disparities described external factors (e.g., structural racism, ambiguous national guidelines, national quality metrics) that permeate the LT evaluation process. Mechanisms identified included minimal transplant team diversity, implicit bias, and interpersonal racism. A lack of resources was a common theme, such as social workers, transportation assistance, non-English-language materials, and time (e.g., more time for education for patients with health literacy concerns). Because of the minimal data collection or center feedback about disparities, participants felt uncomfortable with and unadaptable to unwanted outcomes, which perpetuate disparities. We proposed transplant center-level solutions (i.e., including but not limited to training of staff on health equity) to modifiable barriers in the clinical work system that could help patient navigation, reduce disparities, and improve access to care. Our findings call for an urgent need for transplant centers, national societies, and policy makers to focus efforts on improving equity (tailored, patient-centered resources) using the science of human factors and systems engineering.

摘要

种族和民族差异在获得肝移植(LT)等候名单方面仍然存在;然而,对于可能导致这些差异的潜在系统层面因素知之甚少。鉴于 LT 候选评估的复杂性,人类因素和系统工程方法可能会提供一些见解。我们从两个主要的 LT 中心招募了 LT 团队(协调员、高级执业医师、医生、社会工作者、营养师、药剂师和领导层)的参与者。从 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 7 月,我们进行了民族志观察(参与者-患者预约、委员会会议)和半结构化访谈(N=54 次访谈,49 小时观察)。基于这项多中心、多方法定性研究的结果,并结合患者安全系统工程倡议 2.0(一种用于医疗保健的人类因素和系统工程模型),我们创建了一个概念框架,描述了移植工作系统特征和其他外部因素如何改善 LT 评估过程中的公平性。参与者对列出差异的看法描述了影响 LT 评估过程的外部因素(例如,结构性种族主义、国家指南不明确、国家质量指标)。确定的机制包括移植团队的多样性极小、隐性偏见和人际种族主义。资源匮乏是一个常见的主题,例如社会工作者、交通援助、非英语语言材料和时间(例如,为有健康素养问题的患者提供更多的教育时间)。由于很少收集有关差异的数据或中心反馈,参与者对不想要的结果感到不舒服且无法适应,这使得差异持续存在。我们提出了移植中心层面的解决方案(即,包括但不限于对员工进行健康公平培训),以解决临床工作系统中的可修改障碍,这有助于患者导航,减少差异,并改善获得护理的机会。我们的研究结果呼吁移植中心、国家协会和政策制定者迫切需要利用人类因素和系统工程学的科学,集中精力通过量身定制、以患者为中心的资源来提高公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b32/9796377/dc4f614e69b4/LT-28-1841-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验