• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新国际标准(ISO 80369-3)下的肠内喂养管接头清洁方法比较。

Comparison of Methods for Cleaning Enteral Feeding Tube Junctions of the New International Standard (ISO 80369-3).

机构信息

Division of Social Pharmacy, Department of Healthcare and Regulatory Sciences, School of Pharmacy, SHOWA University, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Infection Control Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, SHOWA University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Nutr Metab. 2022;78(4):207-212. doi: 10.1159/000525367. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1159/000525367
PMID:35728557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9677827/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

International standards for enteral feeding involving the use of feeding tubes with junctions have been introduced. If these junctions are not properly cleaned, they can become contaminated, leading to microbial infections. We aimed to compare the ease and effectiveness of cleaning of four methods using the number of bacteria.

METHODS

We compared enteral nutrition tube junctions cleaned using four methods such as water, toothbrush, cotton swab, and EnClean® brush with an uncleaned control. Once daily for 7 days, the tubes were injected with nutrients, cleaned, and incubated at 37°C. Samples for bacterial culture were collected before injections on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. The culture samples were incubated at 37°C for 48 h, and the number of colonies was counted.

RESULTS

The number of residual bacteria on day 28 did not differ between the four cleaning methods and the control group. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in bacterial counts among the four wash methods. The number of washes did not differ among cleaning methods.

CONCLUSION

The bacterial count in the ISO-standardized tube junction increased, and none of the cleaning methods decreased the counts.

摘要

简介

国际标准规定,使用带有接头的肠内喂养管时,应进行接头清洁。如果这些接头没有得到适当的清洁,就会受到污染,从而导致微生物感染。我们旨在通过细菌数量比较四种方法(水、牙刷、棉签和 EnClean®刷子)的清洁效果和便捷性。

方法

我们将使用水、牙刷、棉签和 EnClean®刷子四种方法清洁肠内营养管接头,并与未清洁的对照组进行比较。每天一次,连续 7 天,在每次注射营养物之前,将管注入、清洁并在 37°C 下孵育。在第 7、14、21 和 28 天收集细菌培养样本。将培养样本在 37°C 下孵育 48 小时,然后计算菌落数量。

结果

在第 28 天,四种清洁方法与对照组之间残留细菌数量没有差异。此外,四种清洗方法之间的细菌计数也没有显著差异。清洁方法之间的清洗次数没有差异。

结论

ISO 标准化管接头中的细菌计数增加,没有一种清洁方法可以减少计数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/9677827/f03ba9f51a8a/anm-0078-0207-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/9677827/f03ba9f51a8a/anm-0078-0207-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/9677827/f03ba9f51a8a/anm-0078-0207-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Methods for Cleaning Enteral Feeding Tube Junctions of the New International Standard (ISO 80369-3).新国际标准(ISO 80369-3)下的肠内喂养管接头清洁方法比较。
Ann Nutr Metab. 2022;78(4):207-212. doi: 10.1159/000525367. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Re-use of enteral feeding tubes--a potential hazard to the patient? A study of the efficiency of a representative range of cleaning and disinfection procedures.重复使用肠内营养管——对患者是否存在潜在危害?对一系列具有代表性的清洁和消毒程序的效果研究。
J Hosp Infect. 1991 Jun;18(2):131-8. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90157-4.
3
[Postpyloric feeding tubes for surgical intensive care patients. Pilot series to evaluate two methods for bedside placement].[用于外科重症监护患者的幽门后喂养管。评估两种床边放置方法的试点系列研究]
Anaesthesist. 2011 Mar;60(3):214-20. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1814-7. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
4
A laboratory-based evaluation of tube blocking and microbial risks associated with one blended enteral feed recipe.基于实验室的评估:一种混合肠内配方相关的管腔堵塞和微生物风险。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Oct;32(5):667-675. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12685. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
5
Microbial contamination of enteral feeding tubes occurring during nutritional treatment.营养治疗期间肠内喂养管发生的微生物污染。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992 Nov-Dec;16(6):552-7. doi: 10.1177/0148607192016006552.
6
Feeding tube practices and the colonisation of the preterm stomach in the first week of life.出生后第一周的喂养管操作与早产儿胃定植情况
Dan Med J. 2022 Jul 13;69(8):A06210494.
7
Randomized comparison of nasojejunal and nasogastric feeding in critically ill patients.危重症患者鼻空肠管饲与鼻胃管饲的随机对照研究
Crit Care Med. 2002 Mar;30(3):586-90. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200203000-00016.
8
Small-bore feeding tube versus large-bore sump tube for early enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients: A nationwide inpatient database study.小口径喂养管与大口径引流管用于机械通气患者早期肠内营养的比较:一项全国住院患者数据库研究
Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun;40(6):4113-4119. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
9
[Value of nasojejunal nutrition in the treatment of children with acute pancreatitis].鼻空肠营养在儿童急性胰腺炎治疗中的价值
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Feb;51(2):136-40.
10
[Nasojejunal enteral feeding tubes in critically ill patients. Successful placement without technical assistance].[危重症患者的鼻空肠肠内喂养管。无需技术协助即可成功放置]
Anaesthesist. 2007 Dec;56(12):1217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00101-007-1260-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial Contamination of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube and Nasogastric Tube with Drug-Resistant Bacteria.经皮内镜下胃造口管和鼻胃管的耐药菌微生物污染
Ann Nutr Metab. 2025;81(3):150-159. doi: 10.1159/000543972. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Differences in the growth of microorganisms depends on the type of semi-solid enteral nutritional supplements.微生物生长的差异取决于半固体肠内营养补充剂的类型。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2023 Sep 1;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40780-023-00297-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal hang time of enteral formula at standard room temperature and high temperature.标准室温及高温下肠内营养制剂的最佳悬挂时间
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Oct 6;8(19):4410-4415. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4410.
2
The effects and mechanism of using ultrasonic dishwasher to remove five pesticides from rape and grape.利用超声波洗碗机去除油菜和葡萄中五种农药的效果及机理。
Food Chem. 2019 Nov 15;298:125007. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125007. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
In vitro and in vivo removal of oral Candida from the denture base.
从义齿基托上去除口腔念珠菌的体外和体内研究
Gerodontology. 2016 Jun;33(2):247-52. doi: 10.1111/ger.12149. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
4
Impact of wash cycle time, temperature and detergent formulation on the hygiene effectiveness of domestic laundering.洗涤周期时间、温度和洗涤剂配方对家庭洗涤卫生效果的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Dec;117(6):1787-97. doi: 10.1111/jam.12647. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
5
Bacterial contamination of hospital-prepared enteral tube feeding formulas in Isfahan, Iran.伊朗伊斯法罕医院自制肠内营养管饲配方的细菌污染情况。
J Res Med Sci. 2009 May;14(3):149-56.
6
Efficacy of electrolyzed water and an acidic formulation compared with regularly used chemical sanitizers for tableware sanitization during mechanical and manual ware-washing protocols.在机械和手工餐具清洗规程中,电解水和酸性配方与常用化学消毒剂相比用于餐具消毒的效果。
J Food Prot. 2009 Jun;72(6):1315-20. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1315.
7
Ultrasonic system for continuous washing of textiles in liquid layers.用于在液层中连续洗涤纺织品的超声系统。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2010 Jan;17(1):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
8
Analysis of sites of bacterial contamination in an enteral feeding system.肠内营养输注系统细菌污染部位分析
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):519-25. doi: 10.1177/0148607106030006519.
9
Microbial contamination of enteral feeding formulas and diarrhea.肠内营养制剂的微生物污染与腹泻
Nutrition. 2000 Sep;16(9):719-22. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00229-4.
10
Bacteriological quality of fabrics washed at lower-than-standard temperatures in a hospital laundry facility.医院洗衣设施中在低于标准温度下洗涤的织物的细菌学质量。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Feb;45(2):591-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.2.591-597.1983.