• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大学工作场所出柜:一项关于 LGBTQ+ 员工可见性的案例研究。

Coming out in the university workplace: a case study of LGBTQ + staff visibility.

作者信息

Lee Catherine

机构信息

Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

High Educ (Dordr). 2023;85(5):1181-1199. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00884-y. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10734-022-00884-y
PMID:35730026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9194892/
Abstract

This article explores the issue of workplace visibility and signs and symbols of LGBTQ + identity in a UK university. A poststructuralist Butlerian theoretical framework underpins this article. Sexual and gender identities are understood as multiple and fragmented, and constructed in relation to others and within the systems of power and knowledge that exist in universities and society more widely. An anonymous survey and focus group discussions were conducted with LGBTQ + staff in a higher education institution in England awarded university status in 1992. Results showed that staff felt relatively comfortable coming out to their peer-groups in the workplace but were less confident in coming out to students. Signs and symbols of LGBTQ + identities were fundamentally important to LGBTQ + staff members in helping them feel safe in the workplace and indicating to LGBTQ + students that they were potentially a source of support. The visibility of LGBTQ + senior leaders was important in empowering staff to believe that they too might progress within the university.

摘要

本文探讨了英国一所大学中职场可见性以及 LGBTQ+ 身份的标志和符号这一问题。本文以后结构主义的巴特勒理论框架为基础。性取向和性别身份被理解为多元且碎片化的,并且是在与他人的关系中以及更广泛地存在于大学和社会中的权力与知识体系内构建而成的。对一所于1992年被授予大学地位的英国高等教育机构中的 LGBTQ+ 员工进行了一项匿名调查和焦点小组讨论。结果显示,员工在工作场所向同事出柜时感觉相对自在,但向学生出柜时则信心不足。LGBTQ+ 身份的标志和符号对 LGBTQ+ 员工至关重要,有助于他们在工作场所感到安全,并向 LGBTQ+ 学生表明他们可能是一种支持来源。LGBTQ+ 高层领导的可见性对于使员工相信自己也有可能在大学中取得进步很重要。

相似文献

1
Coming out in the university workplace: a case study of LGBTQ + staff visibility.在大学工作场所出柜:一项关于 LGBTQ+ 员工可见性的案例研究。
High Educ (Dordr). 2023;85(5):1181-1199. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00884-y. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
LGBTQ Young Adults' Identity Disclosure in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Qualitative Analysis of Disclosure Intentions and Outcomes.LGBTQ 青年在工作场所的身份披露:披露意愿和结果的纵向定性分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Apr;53(4):1327-1341. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02807-7. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
3
Navigating medical culture and LGBTQ identity.探索医学文化与 LGBTQ 身份认同。
Clin Teach. 2019 Aug;16(4):335-338. doi: 10.1111/tct.13078.
4
LGBTQ+ in STEM: Visibility and Beyond.LGBTQ+ 在 STEM 领域:可见与超越。
Chemistry. 2020 Jul 17;26(40):8670-8675. doi: 10.1002/chem.202002474. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
LGBTQ+ faculty, queering health sciences classrooms: student perspectives.LGBTQ+ 教师,使健康科学课堂多样化:学生视角。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Jun 1;48(2):270-278. doi: 10.1152/advan.00200.2023. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
6
LGBTQ+ Young Adults on the Street and on Campus: Identity as a Product of Social Context.街头与校园中的 LGBTQ+ 青年:身份认同是社会环境的产物。
J Homosex. 2018;65(2):197-223. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1314162. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Come Out, Get Out: Relations Among Sexual Minority Identification, Microaggressions, and Retention in Higher Education.走出困境,摆脱束缚:性少数群体身份认同、微侵犯与高等教育留存率之间的关系
J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP8237-NP8248. doi: 10.1177/0886260520967126. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Orthopaedic Care of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: A Survey of Two Pediatric Academic Hospitals.知识、态度和实践:小儿矫形护理中的性与性别少数青年——两所儿科医院的调查。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1313-1328. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002143. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
9
An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer.评估英国肿瘤学家对 LGBTQ+癌症患者的自我感知知识、态度和行为。
ESMO Open. 2020 Nov;5(6):e000906. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000906.
10
Measuring Allyship: Development and Validation of Two Measures to Assess Collegiate Athlete Department Staff Engagement in LGBTQ Allyship and Ally Behaviors.测量同盟关系:评估大学生运动员部门工作人员参与 LGBTQ 同盟关系和同盟行为的两个测量工具的开发和验证。
J Homosex. 2024 Jul 2;71(8):1900-1917. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2023.2217315. Epub 2023 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
National randomized experimental study finds no evidence of undergraduate bias against LGB biology instructors, even in LGB-unfriendly states.全国随机实验研究发现,即使在对同性恋、双性恋和变性者群体(LGB)不友好的州,也没有证据表明本科生对LGB生物学教师存在偏见。
Bioscience. 2025 Jun 6;75(7):559-572. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaf040. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Holistic Sexual-Reproductive Healthcare Services and Needs for Queer Individuals: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives.整体性与生殖健康护理服务及同性恋者的需求:医疗服务提供者的观点
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 15;12(10):1026. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101026.
3
Few LGBTQ+ Science and Engineering Instructors Come Out to Students, Despite Potential Benefits.尽管可能有好处,但很少有 LGBTQ+ 科学和工程教师向学生出柜。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Jun;23(2):ar17. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-10-0181.
4
Support for affirmative actions to increase inclusivity of intersex* persons at an Austrian medical university.支持采取平权行动,以提高奥地利一所医科大学中间性*人士的包容性。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04830-z.
5
Affirming educational and workplace settings are associated with positive mental health and happiness outcomes for LGBTQA + youth in Australia.肯定教育和工作环境与澳大利亚 LGBTQA + 青年的积极心理健康和幸福结果有关。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):1421. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16034-7.
6
LGBT + academics' and PhD students' experiences of visibility in STEM: more than raising the rainbow flag.LGBT+学者和博士生在STEM领域的可见性经历:不仅仅是升起彩虹旗。
High Educ (Dordr). 2023 Jan 13:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10734-023-00993-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of role models on health outcomes for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth.榜样对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别青年健康结果的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Apr;50(4):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
2
Wearing the cloak: antecedents and consequences of creating facades of conformity.披上伪装:营造顺从表象的前因后果。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 May;94(3):727-41. doi: 10.1037/a0015228.
3
Workplace diversity and public policy: challenges and opportunities for psychology.职场多样性与公共政策:心理学面临的挑战与机遇
Am Psychol. 2008 May-Jun;63(4):252-68. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.252.
4
Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋群体中的偏见、社会压力与心理健康:概念问题与研究证据
Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):674-697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
5
Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education.焦点小组访谈:一种在改善健康教育理论与实践方面未得到充分利用的研究技术。
Health Educ Q. 1987 Winter;14(4):411-48. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400404.