• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据种族划分的腹腔镜结肠切除术的使用趋势:国家住院病人样本数据库分析

Trends in utilization of laparoscopic colectomy according to race: an analysis of the NIS database.

作者信息

DeAngelis Erik J, Zebley James A, Ileka Ikechukwu S, Ganguli Sangrag, Panahi Armon, Amdur Richard L, Vaziri Khashayar, Lee Juliet, Jackson Hope T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, George Washington University, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 6B, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1421-1428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09381-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09381-w
PMID:35731300
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with improved recovery and decreased complications when compared to an open approach. Consequently, the rates of laparoscopic colectomy have increased. Race has been identified as a factor that influences a patient's likelihood of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the rates of laparoscopic colectomy stratified by race over time.

METHODS

Patients were selected using procedure codes for colectomy within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2009 to 2018. The primary independent variable was race (Black, BL; Hispanic, HI; White, WH), and the primary outcome was surgical approach (laparoscopic vs open). Covariates included age, sex, case complexity, insurance status, income, year of surgery, urbanicity, region, bedsize, and teaching status. We examined the univariable association of race with laparoscopic vs open colectomy with chi-square. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of race with procedure type adjusting for covariates. All analyses were done using SAS (version 9.4, Cary, NC) with p < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

267,865 patients (25,000 BL, 19,685 HI, and 223,180 WH) were identified. Laparoscopy was used in 47% of cases, and this varied significantly by race (BL 44%, HI 49%, WH 47%, p < .0001). After adjusting for covariates, Black patients had significantly lower adjusted odds of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy vs White patients (aOR 0.92, p < 0.0001). Utilization of laparoscopy was similar in Hispanic compared to White patients (aOR 1.00, p = 0.9667). Racial disparity in the adjusted odds of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy was persistent over time.

CONCLUSION

Race was independently associated with the rate of laparoscopic colectomy, with Black patients less likely to receive laparoscopic surgery than White patients. This disparity persisted over a decade. Attention should be paid to increasing the rates of laparoscopic colectomy in under-represented populations in order to optimize surgical care and address racial disparities.

摘要

背景

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜结肠切除术与更好的恢复和更低的并发症发生率相关。因此,腹腔镜结肠切除术的比例有所增加。种族已被确定为影响患者接受腹腔镜结肠切除术可能性的一个因素。因此,本研究的目的是分析不同种族随时间推移的腹腔镜结肠切除术比例。

方法

使用2009年至2018年国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中的结肠切除术程序代码选择患者。主要自变量是种族(黑人,BL;西班牙裔,HI;白人,WH),主要结局是手术方式(腹腔镜与开放)。协变量包括年龄、性别、病例复杂性、保险状况、收入、手术年份、城市化程度、地区、床位规模和教学状况。我们用卡方检验研究种族与腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术的单变量关联。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来研究种族与调整协变量后的手术类型之间的关联。所有分析均使用SAS(版本9.4,北卡罗来纳州卡里)进行,p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共识别出267,865例患者(25,000例黑人,19,685例西班牙裔,223,180例白人)。47%的病例采用了腹腔镜手术,且这一比例因种族而异(黑人44%,西班牙裔49%,白人47%,p < 0.0001)。在调整协变量后,黑人患者接受腹腔镜结肠切除术的调整后概率显著低于白人患者(调整后比值比0.92,p < 0.0001)。与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者腹腔镜手术的使用率相似(调整后比值比1.00,p = 0.9667)。接受腹腔镜结肠切除术的调整后概率的种族差异随时间持续存在。

结论

种族与腹腔镜结肠切除术的比例独立相关,黑人患者接受腹腔镜手术的可能性低于白人患者。这种差异持续了十年以上。应关注提高代表性不足人群的腹腔镜结肠切除术比例,以优化手术治疗并解决种族差异问题。

相似文献

1
Trends in utilization of laparoscopic colectomy according to race: an analysis of the NIS database.根据种族划分的腹腔镜结肠切除术的使用趋势:国家住院病人样本数据库分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1421-1428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09381-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Racial disparities in the use of laparoscopic surgery to treat colonic diverticulitis Are not fully explained by socioeconomics or disease complexity.腹腔镜手术治疗结肠憩室炎的种族差异不能完全由社会经济因素或疾病复杂性来解释。
Am J Surg. 2017 Apr;213(4):673-677. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
3
Access to common laparoscopic general surgical procedures: do racial disparities exist?普通腹腔镜普外科手术的可及性:是否存在种族差异?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1376-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06912-w. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Can laparoscopy for colon resection reduce the need for discharge to skilled care facility?腹腔镜结肠切除术能否减少转至专业护理机构的需求?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4038-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3052-y. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
5
Variations in Laparoscopic Colectomy Utilization in the United States.美国腹腔镜结肠切除术应用情况的差异
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Oct;58(10):950-6. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000448.
6
Racial Disparity in the Surgical Management of Diverticular Disease.憩室病外科治疗中的种族差异
Am Surg. 2022 May;88(5):929-935. doi: 10.1177/00031348211058623. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
7
Do the advantages of a minimally invasive approach remain in complex colorectal procedures? A nationwide comparison.微创方法在复杂结直肠手术中的优势是否依然存在?一项全国性比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Apr;58(4):431-43. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000325.
8
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis: a case-matched analysis from a nationwide database.腹腔镜与开放全结肠切除回直肠吻合术的短期结局:来自全国性数据库的病例匹配分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Nov;20(11):767-773. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1539-y. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
9
Payer status and access to laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis.支付者状态与溃疡性结肠炎腹腔镜次全结肠切除术的应用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Sep;56(9):1062-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829b2d30.
10
National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer.腹腔镜结直肠手术治疗结肠癌的全国差异。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3160-8. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial disparities in complications following elective colon cancer resection: Impact of laparoscopic versus robotic approaches.择期结肠癌切除术后并发症的种族差异:腹腔镜与机器人手术方式的影响。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.038. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the affordable care act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on access to minimally invasive surgical care.平价医疗法案(ACA)医疗补助扩张对微创手术护理可及性的影响。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jan;219(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
2
Access to common laparoscopic general surgical procedures: do racial disparities exist?普通腹腔镜普外科手术的可及性:是否存在种族差异?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1376-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06912-w. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Association of Race With Bariatric Surgery Outcomes.
种族与减重手术结果的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190029. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0029. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
The Disparity of Care and Outcomes for Medicaid Patients Undergoing Colectomy.接受结肠切除术的医疗补助患者的护理和结果差距。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.056. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma.结直肠癌患者手术治疗及预后中的种族和社会经济差异
World J Surg. 2019 May;43(5):1342-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-04898-5.
6
Patient, Hospital, and Geographic Disparities in Laparoscopic Surgery Use Among Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Patients With Colon Cancer.监测、流行病学与最终结果医保结肠癌患者腹腔镜手术使用情况中的患者、医院及地理差异
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):905-913. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000874.
7
Racial disparities in the use of laparoscopic surgery to treat colonic diverticulitis Are not fully explained by socioeconomics or disease complexity.腹腔镜手术治疗结肠憩室炎的种族差异不能完全由社会经济因素或疾病复杂性来解释。
Am J Surg. 2017 Apr;213(4):673-677. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
Examination of Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Minimally Invasive Surgery Among a National Cohort of Adult Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.对接受结直肠手术的全国成年患者队列中微创手术接受情况的种族差异进行研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Nov;59(11):1055-1062. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000692.
9
Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.预测提高腹腔镜在结肠癌治疗中利用率的机会。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1855-1862. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5185-2. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
10
Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open colectomy for colon cancer.结肠癌微创手术与开放手术的短期疗效
J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 22.