Asmuje Nur Fazidah, Mat Sumaiyah, Myint Phyo Kyaw, Tan Maw Pin
Kolej Genius Insan, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Ageing and Age-Associated Disorders Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):375-383. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01200-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
To conduct a scoping review of articles which have evaluated BPV and cognitive function. Articles with keywords, titles or abstracts containing the terms 'cognitive' OR 'cognition' OR 'dementia' AND 'blood pressure variability' were identified from CINAHL, Medline, PMC and Web of Science.
Methods of acquisition and analysis of BPV and cognitive measurements and their relationship were extracted from selected articles. Of 656 studies identified, 53 articles were selected. Twenty-five evaluated long-term (LTBPV), nine mid-term (MTBPV), 12 short-term (STBPV) and nine very short-term BPV (VSTBPV) with conflicting findings on the relationship between BPV and cognition. Variations existed in devices, period and procedure for acquisition. The studies also utilized a wide range of methods of BPV calculation. Thirteen cognitive assessment tools were used to measure global cognition or domain functions which were influenced by the population of interest. The interpretation of available studies was hence limited by heterogeneity. There is an urgent need for standardization of BPV assessments to streamline research on BPV and cognition. Future studies should also establish whether BPV could be a potential modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline, as well as a marker for treatment response.
对评估血压变异性(BPV)与认知功能的文章进行范围综述。从护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、医学文献数据库(Medline)、PubMed 中央数据库(PMC)和科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)中检索出关键词、标题或摘要中包含“认知”或“认知能力”或“痴呆”以及“血压变异性”的文章。
从所选文章中提取了血压变异性的获取与分析方法、认知测量方法及其关系。在检索到的656项研究中,选取了53篇文章。25项评估了长期血压变异性(LTBPV),9项评估了中期血压变异性(MTBPV),12项评估了短期血压变异性(STBPV),9项评估了极短期血压变异性(VSTBPV),关于血压变异性与认知之间的关系,研究结果相互矛盾。在获取数据的设备、时间段和程序方面存在差异。这些研究还采用了多种血压变异性计算方法。使用了13种认知评估工具来测量整体认知或受研究人群影响的领域功能。因此,现有研究的解读受到异质性的限制。迫切需要对血压变异性评估进行标准化,以简化关于血压变异性与认知的研究。未来的研究还应确定血压变异性是否可能是认知衰退潜在的可改变风险因素,以及是否可作为治疗反应的标志物。