From the EA 4468, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France (L.R., M.P., O.H., J.-S.V.).
Unité INSERM 1027, Toulouse, France (P.C.).
Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1280-1288. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14553. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
To investigate the impact of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (BPV), diastolic BPV, mean arterial pressure variability, and pulse pressure variability on cognitive decline and incident dementia in noninstitutionalized patients aged ≥65 years. A total of 3319 subjects from the S.AGES (Sujets AGÉS-Aged Subjects) cohort underwent clinical examinations every 6 months during 3 years. Variability was evaluated using standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation, average real variability, successive variation, variation independent of mean, and residual SD. Cognition was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination and dementia with the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards models were used. Higher systolic BPV was associated with poorer cognition independently of baseline SBP: adjusted 1-SD increase of coefficient of variation: β (SE)=-0.12 (0.06), =0.04. Similar results were observed for diastolic BPV and mean arterial pressure variability: β (SE)=-0.20 (0.06), <0.001 for both. Higher pulse pressure variability was no longer associated with cognitive function after adjustment for age, except with residual SD (=0.02). Among the 3319 subjects, 93 (2.8%) developed dementia. Higher systolic BPV was associated with greater dementia risk (adjusted 1-SD increase of coefficient of variation: hazard ratios=1.23 [95% CI, 1.01-1.50], =0.04). Similar results were found for diastolic BPV and mean arterial pressure variability (<0.01). Pulse pressure variability was not associated with dementia risk. Beyond hypertension, higher BPV is a major clinical predictor of cognitive impairment and dementia. Further studies are needed to assess whether controlling BP instability could be a promising interventional target in preserving cognition among older adults.
为了探究变异性在非住院≥65 岁患者中的作用,评估了诊室收缩压变异性(BPV)、舒张压 BPV、平均动脉压变异性和脉压变异性对认知能力下降和痴呆发生的影响。共有 3319 名受试者来自 S.AGES(老年受试者研究)队列,他们在 3 年内每 6 个月接受一次临床检查。使用标准差(SD)、变异系数、平均真实变异、连续变异、均值独立变异和剩余 SD 来评估变异性。认知功能采用简易精神状态检查评估,痴呆采用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》进行诊断。采用线性混合模型和 Cox 比例风险模型进行分析。在校正基线 SBP 后,较高的收缩压 BPV 与认知能力下降独立相关:变异系数 1-SD 增加的调整后 β(SE)=-0.12(0.06),=0.04。舒张压 BPV 和平均动脉压变异性也观察到类似的结果:β(SE)=-0.20(0.06),均<0.001。校正年龄后,较高的脉压变异性与认知功能不再相关,除了剩余 SD(=0.02)。在 3319 名受试者中,有 93 人(2.8%)发生了痴呆。较高的收缩压 BPV 与痴呆风险增加相关(变异系数 1-SD 增加的调整后 HR=1.23[95%CI,1.01-1.50],=0.04)。舒张压 BPV 和平均动脉压变异性也有类似的结果(<0.01)。脉压变异性与痴呆风险无关。除了高血压之外,较高的 BPV 也是认知障碍和痴呆的重要临床预测因素。需要进一步研究以评估控制血压不稳定是否可以成为保护老年人认知功能的有希望的干预靶点。