• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017 年全球哮喘倡议(GINA-2017)哮喘控制测试问卷与肺量计比较 5-18 岁儿童哮喘控制。

Comparison of Asthma Control among Children 5-18 Years of Age by Asthma Control Test Questionnaire of Global Initiative for Asthma 2017 (GINA-2017) Against Spirometry.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Mehta Multispeciality Hospitals India Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Sai Nilayam, New No. 4, Old No. 26, 7th Main Road R.A. Puram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600028, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;90(8):770-775. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04162-8. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s12098-022-04162-8
PMID:35731499
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare asthma control by Asthma Control Test (ACT)/Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT) Questionnaire of Global Initiative for Asthma 2017 (GINA-2017) against spirometry in children, 5-18 y of age, with asthma.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted between July 2017 and March 2019 in pulmonology OPD of a tertiary care center. Children with asthma aged 5-18 y, falling under the inclusion criteria had spirometry and cACT/ACT questionnaire before starting inhaled corticosteroids. After 12 wk, symptom control was reassessed by ACT/cACT and spirometry. Chi-square/Fischer exact test and paired t-test/Mann-Whitney U test used for qualitative and quantitative data, respectively.

RESULTS

ACT/cACT pretreatment score was 12.76 (2.521), and at follow-up the score was 23.94 (1.941) (p < 0.001). Control by GINA increased from 2.04% to 91.84% at follow-up (p < 0.001). Significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), forced expiratory volume/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) between pretreatment and follow-up seen were -71.86%, 106.84%, 101.82%, and 97.51% vs. 82.2%, 109.55%, 110.38%, and 107.00%, respectively. Positive correlation between ACT/cACT and FEV1 (r = 0.26, p ≤ 0.05), PEFR (r = 0.30, p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a good correlation of symptom control between ACT/cACT and spirometry with significant positive correlation for FEV1, PEFR.

摘要

目的

通过比较哮喘控制测试(ACT)/儿童哮喘控制测试(cACT)问卷与全球哮喘倡议 2017 版(GINA-2017)对 5-18 岁哮喘儿童的肺功能的影响,来评估哮喘控制情况。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察研究,于 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 3 月在一家三级护理中心的呼吸科门诊进行。年龄在 5-18 岁,符合纳入标准的哮喘儿童在开始吸入皮质激素前进行肺功能和 cACT/ACT 问卷检查。12 周后,通过 ACT/cACT 和肺功能再次评估症状控制情况。使用卡方检验/Fisher 精确检验和配对 t 检验/曼-惠特尼 U 检验分别进行定性和定量数据分析。

结果

ACT/cACT 治疗前评分为 12.76(2.521),随访时评分为 23.94(1.941)(p<0.001)。GINA 控制率从治疗前的 2.04%增加到随访时的 91.84%(p<0.001)。治疗前和随访时,第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)、用力呼出 25%至 75%肺活量时的流量(FEF)和呼气峰值流量(PEFR)分别显著改善-71.86%、106.84%、101.82%和 97.51%、82.2%、109.55%、110.38%和 107.00%。ACT/cACT 与 FEV1(r=0.26,p≤0.05)、PEFR(r=0.30,p≤0.05)呈正相关。

结论

ACT/cACT 与肺功能在症状控制方面具有良好的相关性,FEV1 和 PEFR 呈显著正相关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Asthma Control among Children 5-18 Years of Age by Asthma Control Test Questionnaire of Global Initiative for Asthma 2017 (GINA-2017) Against Spirometry.2017 年全球哮喘倡议(GINA-2017)哮喘控制测试问卷与肺量计比较 5-18 岁儿童哮喘控制。
Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;90(8):770-775. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04162-8. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Childhood Asthma Control Test and spirometry values in school-age children.儿童哮喘控制测试和学龄儿童的肺功能值。
3
Spirometry in children with asthma and/or allergic rhinitis: comparison of FEF25-75% with the standard measures.哮喘和/或过敏性鼻炎患儿的肺量计检查:FEF25-75%与标准测量值的比较
Minerva Pediatr. 2019 Apr;71(2):103-109. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04267-5. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
4
The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as an alternative tool to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline criteria for assessing asthma control in Vietnamese outpatients.哮喘控制测试(ACT)作为一种替代工具,用于根据全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南标准评估越南门诊患者的哮喘控制情况。
Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Mar;21(1):85-9. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00093.
5
Spirometry use in children hospitalized with asthma.肺活量测定法在哮喘住院儿童中的应用。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 May;49(5):451-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22854. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
6
Spirometry, bronchodilator test or symptom scoring for the assessment of childhood asthma.用于评估儿童哮喘的肺量计检查、支气管扩张试验或症状评分。
Acta Paediatr. 1996 May;85(5):564-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14087.x.
7
[Peak expiratory flow vs. spirometry for the diagnosis of asthma in adults].[成人哮喘诊断中呼气峰值流速与肺量计的比较]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2019 Jul-Sep;66(3):308-313. doi: 10.29262/ram.v66i3.630.
8
Assessment of spirometry and impulse oscillometry in relation to asthma control.评估哮喘控制与肺功能和脉冲震荡技术的关系。
Lung. 2015 Feb;193(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s00408-014-9674-6. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
The Role of FENO in Comparison to Spirometry and ACT in Control of Children Asthma Symptoms.与肺功能测定和哮喘控制测试相比,呼出一氧化氮分数(FENO)在儿童哮喘症状控制中的作用。
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Oct 23;18(5):479-486. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v18i5.1898.
10
Prednisolone oral solution plus inhaled procaterol for acute asthma in children: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.泼尼松龙口服溶液加吸入用丙卡特罗治疗儿童急性哮喘:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2007 Sep-Oct;48(5):257-62.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and pulmonary function changes in cough variant asthma with small airway disease.合并小气道疾病的咳嗽变异性哮喘的临床及肺功能变化
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019 Jul 2;15:41. doi: 10.1186/s13223-019-0354-1. eCollection 2019.
2
Assessment of control of bronchial asthma in children using Childhood Asthma Control Test.使用儿童哮喘控制测试评估儿童支气管哮喘的控制情况。
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2014 Apr-Jun;56(2):75-8.
3
Correlations between pulmonary function and childhood asthma control test results in 5-11-year-old children with asthma.
5至11岁哮喘儿童肺功能与儿童哮喘控制测试结果的相关性
Pediatr Neonatol. 2014 Jun;55(3):218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Association between the results of the childhood asthma control test and objective parameters in asthmatic children.儿童哮喘控制测试结果与哮喘儿童客观参数之间的关联。
J Asthma. 2011 Dec;48(10):1076-80. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.629356. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
5
Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT).比较全球哮喘倡议 (GINA) 标准与儿童哮喘控制测试 (C-ACT) 和哮喘控制测试 (ACT)。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Sep;38(3):561-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00173710. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
6
The minimally important difference of the Asthma Control Test.哮喘控制测试的最小重要差异。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct;124(4):719-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.053. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
7
Relationship of the asthma control test with pulmonary function and exhaled nitric oxide.哮喘控制测试与肺功能及呼出一氧化氮的关系。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Dec;101(6):608-13. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60223-2.
8
A new perspective on concepts of asthma severity and control.哮喘严重程度与控制概念的新视角。
Eur Respir J. 2008 Sep;32(3):545-54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00155307.
9
Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary.哮喘管理和预防全球战略:全球哮喘防治创议执行摘要
Eur Respir J. 2008 Jan;31(1):143-78. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00138707.
10
Development and cross-sectional validation of the Childhood Asthma Control Test.儿童哮喘控制测试的开发与横断面验证
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):817-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.662. Epub 2007 Mar 13.