• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较全球哮喘倡议 (GINA) 标准与儿童哮喘控制测试 (C-ACT) 和哮喘控制测试 (ACT)。

Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT).

机构信息

Dept of Paediatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2011 Sep;38(3):561-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00173710. Epub 2011 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.00173710
PMID:21406508
Abstract

Several tools are useful in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children. The aim of this study was to compare Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children. 145 children with asthma filled in a web-based daily diary card for 4 weeks on symptoms, use of rescue medication and limitations of activities, followed by either the C-ACT or ACT. For predicting uncontrolled asthma, score cut-off points of 19 were used for C-ACT and ACT. According to GINA guidelines, asthma was uncontrolled in 71 (51%) children and completely controlled in 19 (14%) children. The area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curves for C-ACT and ACT versus GINA guidelines were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively. Cut-off points of 19 for C-ACT and ACT resulted in a sensitivity of 33% and 66% in predicting uncontrolled asthma, respectively. C-ACT and ACT correlate well with GINA criteria in predicting uncontrolled asthma, but commonly used cut-off points for C-ACT and ACT seem to underestimate the proportion of children with uncontrolled asthma as defined by GINA.

摘要

有几种工具可用于检测儿童的未控制哮喘。本研究旨在比较全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南与儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)和哮喘控制测试(ACT)在检测儿童未控制哮喘方面的效果。145 名哮喘患儿在四周内通过网络在线日记卡填写症状、使用急救药物和活动受限情况,然后填写 C-ACT 或 ACT。对于预测未控制哮喘,C-ACT 和 ACT 的临界值分别为 19。根据 GINA 指南,71 名(51%)患儿哮喘未控制,19 名(14%)患儿哮喘完全控制。C-ACT 和 ACT 与 GINA 指南的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.89 和 0.92。C-ACT 和 ACT 的临界值为 19,预测未控制哮喘的敏感性分别为 33%和 66%。C-ACT 和 ACT 与 GINA 标准在预测未控制哮喘方面相关性良好,但 C-ACT 和 ACT 的常用临界值似乎低估了 GINA 定义的未控制哮喘患儿的比例。

相似文献

1
Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT).比较全球哮喘倡议 (GINA) 标准与儿童哮喘控制测试 (C-ACT) 和哮喘控制测试 (ACT)。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Sep;38(3):561-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00173710. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
2
Consistency of GINA criteria and childhood asthma control test on the determination of asthma control.GINA 标准与儿童哮喘控制测试在哮喘控制判定上的一致性。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012 Feb;23(1):34-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01232.x. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
3
Measuring asthma control: a comparison of three classification systems.哮喘控制的评估:三种分类系统的比较。
Eur Respir J. 2010 Aug;36(2):269-76. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00124009. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
4
The Asthma Control Test, Japanese version (ACT-J) as a predictor of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a questionnaire-based survey.《哮喘控制测试》日本版(ACT-J)作为全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南定义的哮喘控制的预测指标:基于问卷调查的分析。
Allergol Int. 2013 Sep;62(3):323-30. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.13-OA-0535. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
5
Asthma control assessment in a pediatric population: comparison between GINA/NAEPP guidelines, Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), and physician's rating.儿童哮喘控制评估:GINA/NAEPP 指南、儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)和医生评分的比较。
Allergy. 2014 Jun;69(6):784-90. doi: 10.1111/all.12402. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
6
Prospective evaluation of current asthma control using ACQ and ACT compared with GINA criteria.使用 ACQ 和 ACT 与 GINA 标准对当前哮喘控制进行前瞻性评估。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
7
[Comparison of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) with lung function, levels of exhaled nitric oxide and control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)].[哮喘控制测试(ACT)与肺功能、呼出气一氧化氮水平以及根据全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)的控制情况的比较]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2010 Jul;46(7):370-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2010.04.003.
8
Assessing asthma control: symptom scores, GINA levels of asthma control, lung function, and exhaled nitric oxide.评估哮喘控制情况:症状评分、GINA 哮喘控制水平、肺功能和呼出气一氧化氮。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Feb;47(2):113-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21529. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
9
Comparing Asthma Control Test with Global Initiative for Asthma Defined Control in Nigerian Adult Asthmatics: A Prospective Cross-sectional study.比较哮喘控制测试与全球哮喘防治创议定义的尼日利亚成年哮喘患者控制情况:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
West Afr J Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;36(1):29-42.
10
The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as an alternative tool to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline criteria for assessing asthma control in Vietnamese outpatients.哮喘控制测试(ACT)作为一种替代工具,用于根据全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南标准评估越南门诊患者的哮喘控制情况。
Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Mar;21(1):85-9. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00093.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of an educational asthma management program (CuidAR): the protocol for a cluster-randomized trial in the Brazilian primary healthcare setting.一项哮喘管理教育项目(CuidAR)的有效性:巴西初级卫生保健环境中一项整群随机试验的方案
Trials. 2025 Aug 6;26(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08983-8.
2
Level of agreement between two asthma control questionnaires in children and adolescents.两种儿童及青少年哮喘控制问卷之间的一致性水平。
J Bras Pneumol. 2025 Jun 13;51(2):e20240407. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240407. eCollection 2025.
3
Four-week IgE/baseline IgE ratio combined with tryptase predicts clinical outcome in omalizumab-treated children with moderate-to-severe asthma.
四周的免疫球蛋白E/基线免疫球蛋白E比值联合类胰蛋白酶可预测接受奥马珠单抗治疗的中重度哮喘儿童的临床结局。
Open Med (Wars). 2025 May 21;20(1):20251176. doi: 10.1515/med-2025-1176. eCollection 2025.
4
A Retrospective Study Evaluating Asthma Control in Patients on Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Proactive Regular Dosing with a History of Uncontrolled Asthma.一项回顾性研究:评估有哮喘控制不佳病史的患者使用丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗主动常规给药时的哮喘控制情况。
Pulm Ther. 2025 Mar;11(1):25-40. doi: 10.1007/s41030-024-00278-8. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
5
Association between pre-biologic T2-biomarker combinations and response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.严重哮喘患者中 T2 生物标志物组合与生物制剂应答之间的关联。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1361891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1361891. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission after Biologic Treatment in Adults.探索成人接受生物治疗后重度哮喘临床缓解的定义和预测因素。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct 1;210(7):869-880. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2192OC.
7
Nasal oxidative stress mediating the effects of colder temperature exposure on pediatric asthma symptoms.鼻腔氧化应激介导低温暴露对儿童哮喘症状的影响。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Sep;96(4):1045-1051. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03196-2. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
8
Associations between personal apparent temperature exposures and asthma symptoms in children with asthma.个人体感温度暴露与哮喘儿童哮喘症状之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0293603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293603. eCollection 2023.
9
A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population.系统评价用于评估初级保健人群中儿童哮喘控制的问卷。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2023 Jul 11;33(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9.
10
Evaluating inhaler education interventions for hospitalized children with asthma: A randomized controlled trial.评估哮喘住院患儿吸入器教育干预措施的随机对照试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Aug;131(2):217-223.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Mar 3.