• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弱势群体社区中社会企业对健康的影响:一项混合方法研究方案

The Health Impact of Social Community Enterprises in Vulnerable Neighborhoods: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Hendriks Erik, Koelen Maria, Verkooijen Kirsten, Hassink Jan, Vaandrager Lenneke

机构信息

Health and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Wageningen Plant Research, Agrosystems Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 22;11(6):e37966. doi: 10.2196/37966.

DOI:10.2196/37966
PMID:35731574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9260530/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This 4-year research project focuses on 6 social community enterprises (SCEs) that operate in 5 neighborhoods in a Dutch city. Residents of these neighborhoods face problems such as poor average levels of physical and mental health, high unemployment rates, and weak social cohesion. SCEs offer residents social, cultural, and work-related activities and are therefore believed to help these persons develop themselves and strengthen the social ties in the community. Because of a lack of empirical evidence; however, it is unclear whether and how SCEs benefit the health and well-being of participants.

OBJECTIVE

This paper outlines a protocol for an evaluation study on the impact of SCEs, aiming to determine (1) to what extent SCEs affect health and well-being of participating residents, (2) what underlying processes and mechanisms can explain such impact, and (3) what assets are available to SCEs and how they can successfully mobilize these assets.

METHODS

A mixed methods multiple-case study design including repeated measurements will be conducted. Six SCEs form the cases. An integrated model of SCE health intervention will be used as the theoretical basis. First, the impact of SCEs is measured on the individual and community level, using questionnaires and in-depth interviews conducted with participants. Second, the research focuses on the underlying processes and mechanisms and the organizational and sociopolitical factors that influence the success or failure of these enterprises in affecting the health and well-being of residents. At this organizational level, in-depth interviews are completed with SCE initiators and stakeholders, such as municipal district managers. Finally, structurally documented observations are made on the organizational and sociopolitical context of the SCEs.

RESULTS

This research project received funding from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development in 2018. Data collection takes place from 2018 until 2022. Data analysis starts after the last round of data collection in 2022 and finalizes in 2024. Expected results will be published in 2023 and 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the societal relevance of SCEs, little empirical research has been performed on their functioning and impact. This research applies a variety of methods and includes the perspectives of multiple stakeholders aiming to generate new empirical evidence. The results will enable us to describe how SCE activities influence intermediate and long-term health outcomes and how the organizational and sociopolitical context of SCEs may shape opportunities or barriers for health promotion. As the number of these initiatives in the Netherlands is increasing rapidly, this research can benefit many SCEs attempting to become more effective and increase their impact. The findings of this research will be shared directly with relevant stakeholders through local and national meetings and annual reports and disseminated among other researchers through scientific publications.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/37966.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/587f/9260530/00e1a69e1efd/resprot_v11i6e37966_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/587f/9260530/00e1a69e1efd/resprot_v11i6e37966_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/587f/9260530/00e1a69e1efd/resprot_v11i6e37966_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

这个为期4年的研究项目聚焦于荷兰一座城市中5个社区的6家社会社区企业(SCE)。这些社区的居民面临身心健康平均水平较差、失业率高以及社会凝聚力薄弱等问题。社会社区企业为居民提供社会、文化及与工作相关的活动,因此被认为有助于这些人实现自我发展并加强社区内的社会联系。然而,由于缺乏实证证据,尚不清楚社会社区企业是否以及如何使参与者的健康和福祉受益。

目的

本文概述了一项关于社会社区企业影响的评估研究方案,旨在确定:(1)社会社区企业在多大程度上影响参与居民的健康和福祉;(2)哪些潜在过程和机制可以解释这种影响;(3)社会社区企业可利用哪些资产以及它们如何成功调动这些资产。

方法

将进行一项包括重复测量的混合方法多案例研究设计。六个社会社区企业构成案例。一个社会社区企业健康干预的综合模型将用作理论基础。首先,使用对参与者进行的问卷调查和深入访谈,在个体和社区层面衡量社会社区企业的影响。其次,研究聚焦于潜在过程和机制以及影响这些企业在影响居民健康和福祉方面成败的组织和社会政治因素。在这个组织层面,与社会社区企业发起者和利益相关者(如市辖区经理)进行深入访谈。最后,对社会社区企业的组织和社会政治背景进行结构化记录观察。

结果

该研究项目于2018年获得荷兰卫生研究与发展组织的资助。数据收集从2018年持续到2022年。数据分析在2022年最后一轮数据收集之后开始,并于2024年完成。预期结果将于2023年和2024年发表。

结论

尽管社会社区企业具有社会相关性,但关于其运作和影响的实证研究很少。本研究应用了多种方法,并纳入了多个利益相关者的观点,旨在生成新的实证证据。研究结果将使我们能够描述社会社区企业活动如何影响中期和长期健康结果,以及社会社区企业的组织和社会政治背景如何塑造健康促进的机会或障碍。由于荷兰此类举措的数量正在迅速增加,本研究可使许多试图提高效率和扩大影响的社会社区企业受益。本研究的结果将通过地方和全国会议以及年度报告直接与相关利益相关者分享,并通过科学出版物在其他研究人员中传播。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/37966

相似文献

1
The Health Impact of Social Community Enterprises in Vulnerable Neighborhoods: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.弱势群体社区中社会企业对健康的影响:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 22;11(6):e37966. doi: 10.2196/37966.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Evaluating the Healthy Futures Nearby Program: Protocol for Unraveling Mechanisms in Health-Related Behavior Change and Improving Perceived Health Among Socially Vulnerable Families in the Netherlands.评估“附近健康未来”项目:荷兰社会弱势家庭健康相关行为改变机制及改善健康认知的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 2;8(4):e11305. doi: 10.2196/11305.
5
Mobility and Participation of People With Disabilities Using Mobility Assistive Technologies: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.使用移动辅助技术的残疾人的移动性与参与度:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(4):e12089. doi: 10.2196/12089.
6
Use of Social Media for Cancer Prevention Through Neighborhood Social Cohesion: Protocol for a Feasibility Study.通过邻里社会凝聚力利用社交媒体预防癌症:一项可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jul 30;10(7):e28147. doi: 10.2196/28147.
7
Development and Evaluation of a Community Health Program to Promote Physical Activity Among Vulnerable Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.一项促进弱势社区居住老年人身体活动的社区健康计划的开发与评估:前瞻性队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 20;13:e51462. doi: 10.2196/51462.
8
Area-based interventions to ameliorate deprived Dutch neighborhoods in practice: does the Dutch District Approach address the social determinants of health to such an extent that future health impacts may be expected?实践中改善荷兰贫困社区的区域干预措施:荷兰地区方法在多大程度上解决了健康的社会决定因素,以至于可以预期对未来健康产生影响?
Prev Med. 2014 Apr;61:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
9
Tuberculosis结核病
10
Assessing Determinants of Programmatic Performance of Community Management of Malaria, Pneumonia, and Diarrhea in Children in Africa: Protocol and Data Collection for a Mixed Methods Evaluation of Integrated Community Case Management.评估非洲儿童疟疾、肺炎和腹泻社区管理项目绩效的决定因素:综合社区病例管理混合方法评估的方案与数据收集
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 14;11(3):e33076. doi: 10.2196/33076.

本文引用的文献

1
Care Farming for People with Dementia; What Can Healthcare Leaders Learn from This Innovative Care Concept?为痴呆症患者开展关怀性农事活动;医疗保健领导者能从这个创新的护理理念中学到什么?
J Healthc Leadersh. 2020 Mar 10;12:11-18. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S202988. eCollection 2020.
2
Characteristics and Challenges for the Development of Nature-Based Adult Day Services in Urban Areas for People with Dementia and Their Family Caregivers.基于自然的成人日间服务在城市地区的发展特点和挑战:为痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者提供服务。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 14;16(8):1337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081337.
3
Exploring the role of social capital in urban citizens' initiatives in the Netherlands.
探究社会资本在荷兰城市公民倡议中的作用。
Gac Sanit. 2018 Nov-Dec;32(6):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
4
Conceptualizing the health and well-being impacts of social enterprise: a UK-based study.概念化社会企业对健康和福祉的影响:一项基于英国的研究。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 1;33(5):748-759. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax009.
5
Contexts, Mechanisms, and Outcomes That Matter in Dutch Community-Based Physical Activity Programs Targeting Socially Vulnerable Groups.针对社会弱势群体的荷兰社区体育活动项目中的重要背景、机制和成果。
Eval Health Prof. 2017 Sep;40(3):294-331. doi: 10.1177/0163278716652940. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
6
Improving the evidence base on public health assets--the way ahead: a proposed research agenda.完善公共卫生资产的证据基础——前进之路:一项拟议的研究议程。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Aug;69(8):721-3. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205096. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
7
The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: a model and systematic review.社会企业促进健康与福祉的潜力:一种模式及系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:182-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.031. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
8
A short form of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE-6): Development, psychometric properties and validity in an intercultural non-clinical sample and a sample of patients at risk for heart failure.一般自我效能感量表简版(GSE-6):跨文化非临床样本及心力衰竭风险患者样本中的编制、心理测量特性与效度
Psychosoc Med. 2013;10:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/psm000091. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
9
Opportunities to reduce health inequalities by 'Health in All Policies' in the Netherlands: an explorative study on the national level.通过“全政策中的健康”减少荷兰健康不平等的机会:国家层面的探索性研究。
Health Policy. 2011 Dec;103(2-3):130-40. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
10
Care farms in the Netherlands: attractive empowerment-oriented and strengths-based practices in the community.荷兰的关怀农场:社区中具有吸引力的以赋权为导向和优势为本的实践。
Health Place. 2010 May;16(3):423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.10.016. Epub 2009 Nov 10.