Gallego Lucía, Barreiro Y Manuel de Santiago Pablo, de Santiago Manuel
Hospital Clínico San Carlos. C/ Profesor Martin Lagos s/n 28040 Madrid. Mail:
Hospital Carlos III/La Paz de Madrid, Universidad Europea de Madrid.
Cuad Bioet. 2022 May-Aug;33(108):157-178. doi: 10.30444/CB.121.
Until 2020, only Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and the Netherlands admitted, under differentiated legal coverage, requests for euthanasia and / or assisted suicide in patients with non-terminal illnesses, and for reasons of intractable and unbearable suffering. Since March 2021 this is also possible in Spain. The objective of this work is to review the existing studies and characteristics of the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide (ESA) in people with mental disorders (TM) and / or dementia (D) and see if the legal requirements essential in ESA applications in these patients are to be met. The hypothesis is that compliance with these requirements is especially difficult in patients with TM-D, either because of the characteristics of the disease itself, or because of the recognized legal security failures. Likewise, there may be sources of fraud not actually prosecuted by the State, either due to the complicity of society and / or due to the necessary cooperation of Medicine. As a result of this review, we raise criticaethical-deontological considerations about the approval of ESA for patients with TM-D, and its errors and consequences, to the reflection of the readers. We propose as an alternative to ESA the so-called ″palliative psychiatry″, which aims at improving the quality of life of patients and their families by facing the problems associated with severe persistent mental illness -potentially fatal- through the prevention and relief of suffering.
直到2020年,只有比利时、卢森堡、瑞士和荷兰在不同的法律覆盖范围内,接受非终末期疾病患者出于难以忍受的痛苦而提出的安乐死和/或协助自杀请求。自2021年3月起,西班牙也开始允许这样做。这项工作的目的是回顾关于精神障碍(TM)和/或痴呆症(D)患者安乐死和协助自杀(ESA)实践的现有研究及特点,看看这些患者在ESA申请中必须满足的法律要求是否得到满足。假设是,由于疾病本身的特点或公认的法律安全漏洞,TM-D患者尤其难以满足这些要求。同样,可能存在未被国家实际起诉的欺诈源头,这要么是由于社会的共谋,要么是由于医学的必要合作。作为此次综述的结果,我们提出关于批准TM-D患者ESA的批判性伦理-道义考量,及其错误和后果,以供读者思考。我们提议用所谓的“姑息性精神病学”替代ESA,其旨在通过预防和减轻痛苦来面对与严重持续性精神疾病(可能致命)相关的问题,从而提高患者及其家人的生活质量。