International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia; and UWA Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Aust Health Rev. 2022 Aug;46(4):485-495. doi: 10.1071/AH21393.
Objectives Using Google online reviews, this study investigated why patients were satisfied or dissatisfied with their public dental clinic in Victoria, Australia. Methods This mixed methods study gathered Google reviews published by users pre-March, 2021. The reviews were coded and subthemes and major themes were identified. The most common reasons why patients gave reviews were tabulated and stratified according to star rating, remoteness and accessibility index classification, and socio-economic status. Results Of the 522 reviews included in this study, in 317 (60.7%) satisfaction was expressed. Compliments and complaints were documented. A total of 53 subthemes were identified. Major themes included Treatment, Staff, Communication and Professionalism, Patient Factors and Non-Clinical Reasons. From the reviews, more patients were satisfied with general unspecified treatment (n = 195; 14.7%) and dissatisfied with reception staff (n = 64; 4.8%). More reviews were generated by patients who visited clinics in major cities and lower socio-economic areas. Conclusion This study found that most patients expressed satisfaction and identified reasons why patients were satisfied or dissatisfied. Consumer feedback, including compliments and complaints, is an integral aspect of monitoring and improving health service quality. It is important to continue seeking feedback and improve accordingly.
目的 本研究通过谷歌在线评价,调查澳大利亚维多利亚州公立牙科诊所的患者满意度或不满意度的原因。
方法 本混合方法研究收集了 2021 年 3 月前用户在谷歌上发布的评价。对评价进行编码,并确定子主题和主要主题。根据星级评分、偏远程度和可达性指数分类以及社会经济地位,列出患者给出评价的最常见原因。
结果 在纳入本研究的 522 条评价中,有 317 条(60.7%)表示满意。记录了表扬和投诉。共确定了 53 个子主题。主要主题包括治疗、员工、沟通和专业精神、患者因素和非临床原因。从评价中可以看出,更多患者对一般未指明的治疗(n = 195;14.7%)表示满意,而对接待人员(n = 64;4.8%)不满意。更多评价来自于访问大城市和较低社会经济地区诊所的患者。
结论 本研究发现,大多数患者表示满意,并确定了患者满意或不满意的原因。消费者反馈,包括表扬和投诉,是监测和提高医疗服务质量的一个重要方面。继续寻求反馈并进行相应改进非常重要。