College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Clinical Dental Medicine, Columbia University College of Dental Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2022 Jan;86(1):77-87. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12782. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Online review sites have become popular platforms for health care consumers to rate their experiences. An analysis of online reviews can help dental school clinics learn from patient feedback that is not accessible through formal patient surveys. This study's objectives were to characterize patient-generated reviews posted on the Yelp and Google review sites and assess any associations between dental schools' ratings and their respective characteristics.
This cross-sectional study analyzed patient-generated Yelp and Google reviews regarding their experiences at 65 dental school clinics between June and August 2019. Quantitative analysis of selected dental school characteristics and patient ratings was performed using analysis of variance, with effect size measured by the omega-squared (ω ) statistic. Statistical significance was set at p = 0.05. Qualitative analysis of review content was conducted using NVivo software.
Among 65 dental schools in the Unite States, 63 schools (96.9%) had reviews available on Google, and 55 schools (84.6%) had reviews available on Yelp. A total of 4702 patient reviews were included in the analysis (2516 [53.5%] from Google [mean rating = 3.6 ± 0.6 stars] and 2186 [46.5%] from Yelp [mean rating = 3.1 ± 0.9 stars). A school location in the South/Midwest was significantly associated with a higher Yelp rating compared with a school location in the Northeast/West (ω = 0.140, 95% confidence interval = 0.002-0.310, p = 0.003). Qualitative analysis found that review content was predominantly negative; while subthemes in care delivery generated positive responses to care quality, those regarding the pre-care and post-care categories garnered negative responses. This finding was particularly true for comments addressing staff helpfulness, billing and payment, and clinic functioning.
This study's findings indicated that dental programs' online reviews were predominantly negative and covered categories that were not addressed in existing satisfaction surveys.
目的/目标:在线评论网站已成为医疗保健消费者评价体验的热门平台。对在线评论进行分析可以帮助牙科学院从患者反馈中学习,而这些反馈是通过正式的患者调查无法获得的。本研究的目的是描述在 Yelp 和 Google 评论网站上发布的患者生成的评论,并评估牙科学校的评分与其各自特征之间的任何关联。
本横断面研究分析了 2019 年 6 月至 8 月期间在 65 个牙科学校诊所就诊的患者在 Yelp 和 Google 上发表的体验生成的评论。使用方差分析对选定的牙科学校特征和患者评分进行定量分析,使用 ω 平方(ω)统计量衡量效果大小。统计学意义设为 p = 0.05。使用 NVivo 软件对评论内容进行定性分析。
在美国的 65 所牙科学校中,有 63 所(96.9%)在 Google 上有评论,有 55 所(84.6%)在 Yelp 上有评论。共有 4702 条患者评论纳入分析(来自 Google 的 2516 条[平均评分为 3.6 ± 0.6 星]和来自 Yelp 的 2186 条[平均评分为 3.1 ± 0.9 星])。与东北部/西部相比,学校位于南部/中西部的 Yelp 评分显著较高(ω = 0.140,95%置信区间为 0.002-0.310,p = 0.003)。定性分析发现评论内容主要是负面的;虽然在护理提供方面的子主题产生了对护理质量的积极反应,但那些涉及护理前和护理后的类别的反应则是负面的。对于涉及员工的帮助、计费和付款以及诊所功能的评论,这种情况尤其如此。
本研究结果表明,牙科项目的在线评论主要是负面的,涵盖了现有满意度调查中未涉及的类别。