Oncological Care, Careum University of Applied Sciences Health, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oncology Nursing and Science, Tumor and Breast Centre ZeTuP, CEO Foundation SONK (Foundation for Educational Activities in Oncology), St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):8775-8783. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07230-z. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
The aim of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive overview of methods for early identification of cancer-related malnutrition and/or risk of malnutrition in patients with colorectal cancer. The focus is also on applicability and feasibility of the use of nutritional tools in oncology clinical practice.
The literature search was conducted from November to December 2020 in the health science databases by two independent persons. Inclusion criteria were English and German language and articles from 2010 to 2020. Data analysis was carried out through a structured procedure. The research questions guided the literature review.
After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, a total of 35 studies were identified as suitable publications and further analyzed. Eventually, nine original studies, with a total of 926 patients with colorectal cancer before or before and after surgery, addressed assessment measures for early identification of the risk or presence of malnutrition. The following types of nutritional assessment have been described: nutritional anthropometric measurements, laboratory chemistry diagnostics for malnutrition, and several validated nutritional screening and assessment tools. The nutritional tools demonstrate differences in terms of application and content. None of the reviewed studies was a randomized trial. There is little scientific evidence to underpin their specific application in identifying early cancer-related malnutrition in patients with colorectal cancer.
The early assessment of nutritional status in this patient group seems to lack evidence-based standardization in oncology clinical practice. Different groups of health professionals are involved; however, studies do not describe standardized roles. Physical activity as part of nutritional screening is not yet included in the analyzed screening tools.
本文旨在全面综述结直肠癌患者癌症相关营养不良和/或营养不良风险的早期识别方法,重点关注营养工具在肿瘤临床实践中的适用性和可行性。
2020 年 11 月至 12 月,两名独立人员在健康科学数据库中进行了文献检索。纳入标准为英文和德文文献,以及 2010 年至 2020 年发表的文章。通过结构化程序进行数据分析。研究问题指导文献综述。
剔除重复项并筛选标题和摘要后,共确定 35 项适合的出版物,并进一步进行分析。最终,有 9 项原始研究,共纳入 926 例结直肠癌患者(术前或术前及术后),评估了早期识别营养不良风险或营养不良的评估措施。描述了以下类型的营养评估:营养人体测量学测量、营养不良的实验室化学诊断以及几种经过验证的营养筛查和评估工具。这些营养工具在应用和内容上存在差异。综述的研究均非随机试验。几乎没有科学证据支持其在结直肠癌患者中早期识别癌症相关营养不良的具体应用。
在肿瘤临床实践中,对该患者群体的营养状况进行早期评估似乎缺乏循证标准化。不同的卫生专业人员群体都参与其中,但研究并未描述标准化的角色。分析中筛选工具尚未纳入作为营养筛查一部分的体力活动。