Suppr超能文献

五种营养筛查工具在中国结直肠癌手术患者中的适用性:一项横断面研究。

Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 27;12(5):e057765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057765.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most appropriate nutritional risk screening tool for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, five nutritional screening tools, including the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), were employed to evaluate the nutritional risk at admission and short-term clinical outcome prediction.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A comprehensive affiliated hospital of a university in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

PARTICIPANTS

301 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were continuously recruited to complete the study from October 2020 to May 2021.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Within 48 hours of hospital admission, five nutritional screening tools were used to measure the nutritional risk and to determine their relationship with postoperative short-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The nutritional risk assesed by the five tools ranged from 25.2% to 46.2%. Taking the Subject Global Assessment as the diagnostic standard, MNA-SF had the best consistency (κ=0.570, p<0.001) and MST had the highest sensitivity (82.61%). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis after adjusting confounding factors showed that the NRS 2002 score ≥3 (OR 2.400, 95% CI 1.043 to 5.522) was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and was the strongest predictor of postoperative complications (area under the curve 0.621, 95% CI 0.549 to 0.692). The scores of NRS 2002 (r=0.131, p<0.001), MNA-SF (r=0.115, p<0.05) and NRI (r=0.187, p<0.05) were poorly correlated with the length of stay. There was no correlation between the five nutritional screening tools and hospitalisation costs (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the other four nutritional screening tools, we found that NRS 2002 is the most appropriate nutritional screening tool for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.

摘要

目的

确定用于结直肠癌手术患者的最合适的营养风险筛查工具。本研究纳入了 5 种营养筛查工具,包括营养风险筛查 2002(NRS 2002)、微型营养评估简表(MNA-SF)、营养不良通用筛查工具(MUST)、营养不良筛查工具(MST)和营养风险指数(NRI),用于评估入院时的营养风险和短期临床结局预测。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

中国辽宁省沈阳市一所综合性大学附属医院。

参与者

连续招募了 301 例被诊断为结直肠癌的患者,于 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月完成研究。

主要和次要结局测量

入院后 48 小时内,使用 5 种营养筛查工具评估营养风险,并确定其与术后短期临床结局的关系。

结果

5 种工具评估的营养风险为 25.2%46.2%。以主观全面评估为诊断标准,MNA-SF 一致性最好(κ=0.570,p<0.001),MST 灵敏度最高(82.61%)。调整混杂因素后的多变量 Logistic 回归分析显示,NRS 2002 评分≥3(OR 2.400,95%CI 1.0435.522)是术后并发症的独立危险因素,是术后并发症最强的预测因素(曲线下面积 0.621,95%CI 0.549~0.692)。NRS 2002 评分(r=0.131,p<0.001)、MNA-SF 评分(r=0.115,p<0.05)和 NRI 评分(r=0.187,p<0.05)与住院时间呈弱相关。5 种营养筛查工具与住院费用均无相关性(p>0.05)。

结论

与其他 4 种营养筛查工具相比,我们发现 NRS 2002 是评估中国结直肠癌患者营养状况的最合适的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a5/9150165/c09dae2c39a7/bmjopen-2021-057765f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验