Identification of associations and distinguishing moyamoya disease from ischemic strokes of other etiologies: A retrospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION

Better characterizing moyamoya disease (MMD) from ischemic strokes of other etiologies may facilitate earlier diagnosis by raising suspicion for a diagnostic work-up.

METHODS

To identify associated variables, MMD cases (n = 12) were compared against three sets of controls: age-, sex-, and race-matched controls of patients with general neurological disorders (n = 48), unmatched general controls (n = 48), and unmatched non-MMD ischemic stroke controls (n = 48).

RESULTS

MMD patients were 32 years (p < 0.0001) younger than ischemic stroke controls. Relative to non-MMD ischemic strokes, MMD patients had greater odds of presenting with visual field defects (OR: 9.13, p = 0.09) or dizziness (OR: 9.13, p = 0.09), as well as being female (OR: 8.04, p = 0.008), Asian (OR: 3.68, p = 0.087), employed (OR: 6.96, p = 0.02), having migraines (OR: 21.61, p = 0.005), epilepsy (OR: 6.69, p = 0.01), insomnia (OR: 8.90, p = 0.099), and a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; p = 0.002). Patients with MMD, compared to non-MMD ischemic strokes, also had a 4.67 kg/ greater body mass index (BMI) and larger odds (OR relative to normal BMI: 21.00, p = 0.03) of being from obesity class III (>40 kg/ ), yet reduced odds of coronary artery disease (OR: 0.13, p = 0.02). Relative to general controls, MMD patients had greater odds of diabetes mellitus type 2 (OR: 10.07, p = 0.006) and hypertension (OR: 7.28, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

MMD not only has a unique clinical presentation from other ischemic strokes, but also unique comorbidities, which may facilitate earlier work-up and treatment.