Suppr超能文献

了解戒烟研究中的成年人认为自己需要做出哪些改变才能戒烟:戒烟前后认知的定性分析。

Understanding what changes adults in a smoking cessation study believe they need to make to quit smoking: A qualitative analysis of pre- and post-quit perceptions.

机构信息

Department of Medicine.

University of Wisconsin.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Dec;36(8):982-989. doi: 10.1037/adb0000856. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Most individuals who try to quit smoking will not succeed even if they use evidence-based treatment. Qualitative methods can help identify cessation treatments' limitations and suggest adaptations to increase treatment success.

METHOD

Rapid qualitative analysis was conducted on data from 125 adults who smoked daily (48% female; 44% White) and participated in a smoking cessation trial and completed qualitative interviews 2 weeks prequit, reporting on changes they needed to make to quit, and 100 adults (50% female; 49% White) who completed a second interview 2 weeks postquit, reporting changes they had made.

RESULTS

The anticipated changes reported prequit (in order of frequency) were as follows: identify smoking triggers (without a coping plan), focus on benefits of quitting, reduce exposure to others smoking, make other health changes, reduce exposure to nonsocial smoking cues, and reduce alcohol consumption. Many participants were unable to identify specific changes that would aid their cessation success. Changes reported postquit included the following: use the 4 D strategies (delay, drink water, deep breathing, distract), reduce exposure to nonsocial smoking cues, focus on benefits of quitting, change daily routine, make other health changes, reduce exposure to others smoking, and get support from loved ones. Most changes reported postquit were consistent with clinical practice guidelines; however, use of cessation medication was the least reported theme.

CONCLUSION

Prior to quitting, over a third of participants were unable to identify changes to increase cessation success. Those who could focus on triggers and cues for smoking. Postquit, participants reported using cessation strategies encouraged during study cessation counseling. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

即使使用基于证据的治疗方法,大多数试图戒烟的人也不会成功。定性方法可以帮助确定戒烟治疗的局限性,并提出适应性建议以提高治疗成功率。

方法

对 125 名每天吸烟(48%为女性;44%为白人)并参加戒烟试验的成年人和 100 名完成第二次戒烟后 2 周访谈的成年人的数据进行快速定性分析,报告他们需要进行的戒烟改变,并报告他们进行的改变。

结果

报告的戒烟前预期变化(按频率顺序排列)如下:确定吸烟诱因(无应对计划)、关注戒烟益处、减少接触他人吸烟、进行其他健康改变、减少接触非社交吸烟线索、减少饮酒量。许多参与者无法确定有助于戒烟成功的具体变化。报告的戒烟后变化包括以下内容:使用 4D 策略(延迟、喝水、深呼吸、分散注意力)、减少接触非社交吸烟线索、关注戒烟益处、改变日常生活、进行其他健康改变、减少接触他人吸烟、并获得亲人的支持。大多数报告的戒烟后变化与临床实践指南一致;然而,戒烟药物的使用是报告最少的主题。

结论

在戒烟之前,超过三分之一的参与者无法确定增加戒烟成功率的变化。那些能够关注吸烟诱因和线索的人。戒烟后,参与者报告说使用了研究戒烟咨询中鼓励的戒烟策略。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

2
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
3
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
4
Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence.加热烟草制品戒烟和降低吸烟率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013790.pub2.
5
Reduction versus abrupt cessation in smokers who want to quit.想要戒烟的吸烟者中减量戒烟与突然戒烟的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD008033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008033.pub2.
6
Reduction versus abrupt cessation in smokers who want to quit.想要戒烟的吸烟者中减量戒烟与突然戒烟的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008033.pub3.
7
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
8
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.住院患者戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD001837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001837.pub4.

本文引用的文献

3
Smoking Treatment: A Report Card on Progress and Challenges.吸烟治疗:进展与挑战报告卡。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:1-30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-090343.
7
Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction.定性方法在实施研究中的应用:简介。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Oct;280:112516. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516. Epub 2019 Aug 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验