Mamchur Sergey, Chichkova Tatiana, Khomenko Egor, Kokov Alexander
Federal State Budgetary Institution 'Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases', 6, Sosonoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo, Russia.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 26;12(6):1322. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061322.
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effect of pulmonary vein (PV) morphometric characteristics and spatial orientation on the results of cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Methods: A randomized, prospective, single-center controlled study was conducted, enrolling 230 patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared procedural and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent their first procedure of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF with either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n = 108) or CBA (n = 122) and assessed their interaction with the different pattern of PV anatomy, morphometric characteristics, and spatial orientation. The primary efficacy endpoint was any documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) lasting over 30 s during a 12-month follow-up after a 90-day blanking period and discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drugs. The procedure’s endpoint was the achievement of PVI. Before the intervention, all patients underwent computed tomography (CT) to assess the PV anatomical variant, maximum and minimum diameters of the PV’s ostia, their cross-sectional area, orifice ovality index, and PV tilt angles. Results: The mean follow-up period was 14 months (12; 24). Long-term efficacy in the cryoablation group was 78.8% and in the RFA group—83.3% (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.41−1.3; p = 0.31). The RFA results did not depend on PV anatomy. The «difficult» occlusion of the right inferior PV (RIPV) occurred in 12 patients and was associated with a more horizontal PV position in the frontal plane; the mean tilt angle was −15.2 ± 6.2° versus −26.5 ± 6.3° in the absence of technical difficulties (p = 0.0001). In 11 cases (9%), during ablation of the right superior PV (RSPV), phrenic nerve injury (PNI) occurred and was associated with the maximum and minimum RSPV diameter, 20.0−20.4 mm (OR = 13.2; 95% CI: 4.7−41.9, p < 0.05) and 17.5−20 mm (OR = 12.5; 95% CI 3.4−51, p < 0.05), respectively. Patients with arrhythmia recurrence were characterized by significantly larger diameters and ovality of the left superior PV (LSPV). The spatial orientation of the PV does not affect the long-term results of cryoablation. Conclusion: Preprocedural evaluation of PV morphology and orientation using cardiac CT might help choose the optimal technology for the individual patient.
本文旨在评估肺静脉(PV)形态特征和空间方向对冷冻球囊消融(CBA)结果的影响。方法:进行了一项随机、前瞻性、单中心对照研究,纳入230例药物难治性心房颤动(AF)患者。我们比较了首次接受房颤肺静脉隔离(PVI)手术的患者,采用射频消融(RFA)(n = 108)或CBA(n = 122)的手术和长期结果,并评估了它们与不同肺静脉解剖模式、形态特征和空间方向的相互作用。主要疗效终点是在90天空白期和停用抗心律失常药物后的12个月随访期间,任何记录到的持续超过30秒的房性心律失常复发(AF、房扑或房性心动过速)。手术终点是实现PVI。干预前,所有患者均接受计算机断层扫描(CT),以评估肺静脉解剖变异、肺静脉开口的最大和最小直径、横截面积、开口椭圆度指数以及肺静脉倾斜角度。结果:平均随访期为14个月(12;24)。冷冻消融组的长期疗效为78.8%,RFA组为83.3%(OR = 0.74;95% CI 0.41−1.3;p = 0.31)。RFA结果不依赖于肺静脉解剖。右下肺静脉(RIPV)的“困难”闭塞发生在12例患者中,与肺静脉在额面的位置更水平有关;平均倾斜角度为−15.2±6.2°,而在没有技术困难的情况下为−26.5±6.3°(p = 0.0001)。在11例(9%)右上肺静脉(RSPV)消融过程中,发生了膈神经损伤(PNI),并与RSPV的最大和最小直径有关,分别为20.0−20.4 mm(OR = 13.2;95% CI:4.7−41.9,p < 0.05)和17.5−20 mm(OR = 12.5;95% CI 3.4−51,p < 0.05)。心律失常复发的患者其左上肺静脉(LSPV)直径和椭圆度明显更大。肺静脉的空间方向不影响冷冻消融的长期结果。结论:使用心脏CT对肺静脉形态和方向进行术前评估可能有助于为个体患者选择最佳技术。