Suppr超能文献

脂肪营养不良保守治疗效果的评估工具的范围综述。

A Scoping Review of Available Tools in Measurement of the Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment in Lipoedema.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 7 Dębinki Street, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology Informatics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 17 Mariana Smoluchowskiego Street, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 10;19(12):7124. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127124.

Abstract

(1) Background: Due to insufficient knowledge of lipoedema, the treatment of this disease is undoubtedly challenging. However, more and more researchers attempt to incorporate the most effective lipoedema treatment methods. When assessing a new therapeutic method, choosing correct, objective tools to measure the therapeutic outcome is very important. This article aims to present possible instruments that may be used in the evaluation of therapeutic effects in patients with lipoedema. (2) Methods: The data on therapeutic outcome measurements in lipoedema were selected in February 2022, using the Medical University of Gdansk Main Library multi-search engine. (3) Results: In total, 10 papers on this topic have been identified according to inclusion criteria. The tools evaluating the therapeutic outcomes used in the selected studies were: volume and circumference measurement, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, ultrasonography and various scales measuring the quality of life, the level of experiencing pain, the severity of symptoms, functional lower extremity scales, and a 6 min walk test. (4) Conclusion: The tools currently used in evaluating the effectiveness of conservative treatment in women with lipoedema are: volume and circumference measurement, waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage, ultrasonography, VAS scale, quality of life scales (SF-36, RAND-36), symptom severity questionnaire (QuASiL), Lower Extremity Functional Scale and 6 min walk. Choosing a proper tool to measure the treatment outcome is essential to objectively rate the effectiveness of therapeutic method.

摘要

(1) 背景:由于对脂肪水肿的认识不足,这种疾病的治疗无疑具有挑战性。然而,越来越多的研究人员试图纳入最有效的脂肪水肿治疗方法。在评估新的治疗方法时,选择正确、客观的工具来衡量治疗效果非常重要。本文旨在介绍可能用于评估脂肪水肿患者治疗效果的工具。(2) 方法:于 2022 年 2 月使用格但斯克医科大学主图书馆多搜索引擎,检索有关脂肪水肿治疗效果评估的相关数据。(3) 结果:根据纳入标准,共确定了 10 篇关于该主题的论文。在选定的研究中,用于评估治疗效果的工具包括:体积和周长测量、体重指数、腰臀比、超声检查以及各种生活质量、疼痛程度、症状严重程度、功能性下肢量表和 6 分钟步行测试量表。(4) 结论:目前用于评估女性脂肪水肿保守治疗效果的工具包括:体积和周长测量、腰臀比、体脂百分比、超声检查、VAS 量表、生活质量量表(SF-36、RAND-36)、症状严重程度问卷(QuASiL)、下肢功能量表和 6 分钟步行。选择适当的工具来衡量治疗效果对于客观评价治疗方法的有效性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b6/9222339/515e54c7354a/ijerph-19-07124-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验