Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
University Sports, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 20;19(12):7539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127539.
University students frequently engage in unhealthy behaviors. However, there is a lack of studies examining a wide range of their lifestyle characteristics by sex and academic level of study. This cross-sectional survey of students enrolled in BSc, MSc, or PhD programs at one university in Germany (N = 3389) assessed physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), nutrition, sleep quality, and alcohol, tobacco, and other drug (ATOD) use by sex and academic level and was conducted with EvaSys version 8.0. Chi-squared tests compared categorical variables by sex, and binary logistic regression analyses adjusted for sex with Bonferroni adjustments evaluated differences across academic level. Although 91% of students achieved the aerobic PA guidelines, only 30% achieved the muscle strengthening exercises (MSE) guidelines, and 44% had high SB. Likewise, <10% met the fruit and vegetable consumption (FVC) recommendations, >40% of students experienced impaired sleep, and >30% had hazardous alcohol consumption. Less than 20% of the sample achieved the guideline/recommendation of all three PA, MSE and SB. Some behaviors exhibited significant sex and academic level differences. The identified at-risk groups included males (lower FVC), females (eating more during stress), and BSc students (poorer nutrition/sleep quality, more ATOD use). Given the above findings, multipronged strategies are needed with an overarching focus highlighting the health−academic achievement links. Behavioral interventions and environmental policies are required to raise awareness and promote student health.
大学生经常从事不健康的行为。然而,缺乏研究从性别和学术水平的角度来考察他们广泛的生活方式特征。这项在德国一所大学的理学学士、硕士或博士课程的学生中进行的横断面调查(N=3389)评估了体育活动(PA)、久坐行为(SB)、营养、睡眠质量以及酒精、烟草和其他药物(ATOD)的使用情况,按性别和学术水平进行了比较,并使用 EvaSys 版本 8.0 进行了分析。卡方检验比较了性别分类变量,二元逻辑回归分析在考虑性别的基础上进行了 Bonferroni 调整,以评估学术水平之间的差异。尽管 91%的学生达到了有氧运动指南,但只有 30%的学生达到了肌肉强化运动指南,44%的学生有较高的久坐行为。同样,<10%的学生符合水果和蔬菜摄入量(FVC)的推荐,>40%的学生睡眠质量受损,>30%的学生有危险的饮酒行为。不到 20%的样本达到了 PA、MSE 和 SB 的所有三个指南/建议的标准。一些行为表现出明显的性别和学术水平差异。确定的高危人群包括男性(较低的 FVC)、女性(在压力下吃得更多)和理学学士学生(营养/睡眠质量较差,更多的 ATOD 使用)。鉴于上述发现,需要采取多管齐下的策略,以强调健康与学业成就之间的联系。需要行为干预和环境政策来提高认识,促进学生健康。