Suppr超能文献

两种托槽系统动摩擦的比较评估:传统型与自锁型。

Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Kinetic Friction: Conventional and Self-Ligating.

作者信息

Vartolomei Aurel-Claudiu, Serbanoiu Dan-Cosmin, Ghiga Dana-Valentina, Moldovan Marioara, Cuc Stanca, Pollmann Maria Cristina Figueiredo, Pacurar Mariana

机构信息

Faculty of Dental Medicine, GEP University of Medicine Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania.

Raluca Ripan Chemistry Research Institute, Babes Bolyai University, 400294 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 17;15(12):4304. doi: 10.3390/ma15124304.

Abstract

Friction is an intensely studied feature in orthodontics, as the sliding mechanics approach remains one of the most utilized techniques in current practice, and the question of whether self-ligating brackets produce less friction than conventional brackets still stands. The objective of this study was to compare a self-ligating system with different closing mechanisms and a conventional system with different ligating mechanisms regarding their frictional properties. Laboratory measurements were performed using an advanced materials testing machine generating tensile strength and load at maximum Load values, which were statistically analyzed and compared. These two parameters have been associated with the frictional resistance generated at the archwire-bracket slot interface. Statistically significant results were obtained when comparing the active self-ligating brackets with the passive self-ligating (tensile strength mean 1.953, SD 0.4231; load at maximum moad mean 6.000, SD 1.3000) and conventional brackets (tensile strength mean 1.953, SD 0.4231; load at maximum load mean 6.000, SD 1.3000), as well as when comparing the passive self-ligating brackets with the conventional brackets (tensile strength mean 1.708, SD 0.8628; load at maximum load mean 5.254, SD 2.645). The active self-ligating brackets tended to produce more friction when compared to the passive self-ligating brackets but were similar to conventional brackets with stainless steel ligatures.

摘要

摩擦力是正畸学中一个被深入研究的特征,因为滑动力学方法仍然是当前临床实践中最常用的技术之一,而且自锁托槽产生的摩擦力是否比传统托槽更小这一问题依然存在。本研究的目的是比较一种具有不同关闭机制的自锁系统和一种具有不同结扎机制的传统系统的摩擦性能。使用先进的材料试验机进行实验室测量,该试验机在最大载荷值下产生拉伸强度和载荷,并进行统计分析和比较。这两个参数与弓丝 - 托槽槽沟界面产生的摩擦阻力相关。在比较主动自锁托槽与被动自锁托槽(拉伸强度平均值1.953,标准差0.4231;最大载荷时的载荷平均值6.000,标准差1.3000)以及传统托槽时,以及在比较被动自锁托槽与传统托槽时(拉伸强度平均值1.708,标准差0.8628;最大载荷时的载荷平均值5.254,标准差2.645),均获得了具有统计学意义的结果。与被动自锁托槽相比,主动自锁托槽往往产生更多的摩擦力,但与带有不锈钢结扎丝的传统托槽相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7be/9229450/56780165a696/materials-15-04304-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验