McGlynn F D, Kinjo K, Doherty G
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Jul;34(3):707-14. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197807)34:3<707::aid-jclp2270340326>3.0.co;2-f.
Twenty-eight test-anxious Ss received either "cue-controlled relaxation therapy," an inert placebo treatment, or no treatment. Once before and twice after the experimental treatment period each S responded to three test-anxiety scales and to one measure of public-speaking anxiety. Once after the treatment, Ss rated the credibility of the procedure to which they had been exposed. Pre- and posttreatment scores on the measure of (untreated) speech anxiety and posttreatment ratings of credibility both showed that the cued relaxation and placebo procedures exerted equivalent experimental demand for improvement. Scores on all three test-anxiety measures showed that, under these conditions of equivalent demand,the placebo procedure reduced self-reports of test anxiety at least as much as did cue-controlled relaxation. Implications are discussed.
28名考试焦虑的受试者分别接受了“线索控制放松疗法”、一种惰性安慰剂治疗或不接受治疗。在实验治疗期之前一次以及之后两次,每位受试者对三种考试焦虑量表和一种公开演讲焦虑测量指标做出反应。治疗后,受试者对他们所接受程序的可信度进行了评分。(未经治疗的)言语焦虑测量指标的治疗前和治疗后得分以及治疗后可信度评分均表明,线索控制放松和安慰剂程序在改善方面产生了同等的实验需求。所有三种考试焦虑测量指标的得分表明,在这些同等需求的条件下,安慰剂程序减少考试焦虑自我报告的程度至少与线索控制放松一样。文中讨论了相关影响。