• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种多学科护理路径可改善难治性心绞痛的症状、生活质量并减少药物使用。

A multi-disciplinary care pathway improves symptoms, QoL and medication use in refractory angina.

作者信息

Cheng Kevin, de Silva Ranil

机构信息

Honorary Clinical Research Fellow National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, Chelsea, London, SW3 6NP.

Senior Clinical Lecturer, Honorary Consultant Cardiologist National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, Chelsea, London, SW3 6NP.

出版信息

Br J Cardiol. 2020 May 20;27(2):12. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2020.012. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.5837/bjc.2020.012
PMID:35747084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9205235/
Abstract

Refractory angina (RA) is a growing clinical problem. Long-term mortality is better than expected and focus has shifted to improving symptoms, quality of life and psychological morbidity. We established a dedicated multi-disciplinary care pathway for patients with RA and assessed its effect on psychological outcomes, quality of life and polypharmacy. We reviewed electronic health records to capture demographics, changes in medication use, and patient-related outcome measures (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) before and after enrolment. One hundred and ninety patients were referred to our service. Pre- and post-questionnaire data were available in 83 patients. Anxiety and depression scores significantly improved (p<0.05) as well as quality of life and all subcategories of the SAQ (p<0.0001). Patients were most commonly on three or four anti-anginal drugs. In patients with no demonstrable reversible ischaemia, there was a significant reduction in anti-anginal usage (mean reduction of two drugs) after completion of our pathway (p<0.025). In conclusion, a dedicated multi-disciplinary pathway for RA is associated with improvements in quality of life, mental health and polypharmacy. An ischaemia-driven method to rationalise medication may reduce polypharmacy in patients with RA, particularly in patients with no demonstrable ischaemia.

摘要

难治性心绞痛(RA)是一个日益严重的临床问题。其长期死亡率好于预期,关注点已转向改善症状、生活质量和心理疾病。我们为RA患者建立了专门的多学科护理路径,并评估了其对心理结局、生活质量和联合用药的影响。我们回顾了电子健康记录,以获取患者的人口统计学信息、用药变化以及入组前后与患者相关的结局指标(西雅图心绞痛问卷[SAQ]和医院焦虑抑郁量表)。190名患者被转诊至我们的科室。83名患者有问卷前后的数据。焦虑和抑郁评分显著改善(p<0.05),生活质量和SAQ的所有子类别也显著改善(p<0.0001)。患者最常使用三或四种抗心绞痛药物。在没有可证实的可逆性缺血的患者中,完成我们的护理路径后,抗心绞痛药物的使用显著减少(平均减少两种药物)(p<0.025)。总之,RA的专门多学科护理路径与生活质量、心理健康和联合用药的改善相关。一种基于缺血情况来合理用药的方法可能会减少RA患者的联合用药,尤其是在没有可证实缺血的患者中。

相似文献

1
A multi-disciplinary care pathway improves symptoms, QoL and medication use in refractory angina.一种多学科护理路径可改善难治性心绞痛的症状、生活质量并减少药物使用。
Br J Cardiol. 2020 May 20;27(2):12. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2020.012. eCollection 2020.
2
Health related quality of life of patients with refractory angina before and one year after enrolment onto a refractory angina program.顽固性心绞痛患者在参加顽固性心绞痛项目之前及之后一年的健康相关生活质量。
Eur J Pain. 2005 Jun;9(3):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.07.013.
3
The Use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in Patients Who Underwent Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris.脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛患者中西雅图心绞痛问卷的应用。
Pain Med. 2021 Apr 20;22(4):1005-1009. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa447.
4
Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.难治性心绞痛的管理
Eur Cardiol. 2016 Dec;11(2):69-76. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2016:26:1.
5
Effect of Ranolazine in Patients with Chest Pain and Normal Coronaries- A Hospital Based Study.雷诺嗪对胸痛且冠状动脉正常患者的影响——一项基于医院的研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):OC14-OC16. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24405.9617. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
6
Quality of Life Changes After Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty in Patients With Baseline Refractory Angina.基线难治性心绞痛患者慢性完全闭塞血管成形术后生活质量的变化。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar;12(3):e007558. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007558.
7
Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP): An Evidence-Based Analysis.增强型体外反搏(EECP):基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(5):1-70. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
8
Interpretation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials and Clinical Care: A Review.西雅图心绞痛问卷解读作为临床试验和临床护理中的结局指标:综述。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):593-599. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7478.
9
Safety and efficacy of the reducer: A multi-center clinical registry - REDUCE study.减压器的安全性和有效性:一项多中心临床注册研究-RE-duce 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.116. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
10
Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris--results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL).脊髓刺激对难治性心绞痛患者心绞痛症状和生活质量的长期影响——来自欧洲心绞痛登记研究链接研究(EARL)的结果。
Heart. 2010 Jul;96(14):1132-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.177188. Epub 2010 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Sinus Reducer Therapy for Refractory Angina and its Role in Modern Interventional Practice: A Contemporary Review.冠状动脉窦减容术治疗顽固性心绞痛及其在现代介入治疗中的作用:当代综述
Interv Cardiol. 2024 Jul 9;19:e11. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.45. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.难治性心绞痛的管理
Eur Cardiol. 2016 Dec;11(2):69-76. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2016:26:1.
2
Assessing the Impact of Medication Adherence on Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes.评估药物依从性对长期心血管结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 23;68(8):789-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.005.
3
Evidence of poor adherence to secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes: possible remedies through the application of new technologies.急性冠脉综合征后二级预防依从性差的证据:通过应用新技术的可能补救措施。
Open Heart. 2015 Jan 24;2(1):e000166. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000166. eCollection 2015.
4
Efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus in refractory angina.一种用于缩窄冠状静脉窦治疗难治性心绞痛的装置的疗效。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):519-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402556.
5
Predictors of long-term clinical endpoints in patients with refractory angina.难治性心绞痛患者长期临床终点的预测因素
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 30;4(2):e001287. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001287.
6
Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization.治疗不适宜血运重建的难治性心绞痛。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):78-95. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.200. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
7
Long-term survival in patients with refractory angina.难治性心绞痛患者的长期生存。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep;34(34):2683-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht165. Epub 2013 May 12.
8
Management of patients with refractory angina: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pain Society joint guidelines.难治性心绞痛患者的管理:加拿大心血管学会/加拿大疼痛学会联合指南。
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(2 Suppl):S20-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.007.
9
Impact of enhanced external counterpulsation on Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class in patients with chronic stable angina: a meta-analysis.增强型体外反搏对慢性稳定性心绞痛患者加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Jul;30(7):639-45. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.7.639.
10
Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009 Mar 25;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-13.