Suppr超能文献

半月板同种异体移植根部固定技术的生物力学比较:与单纯经骨缝合固定相比,顺行嵌压骨栓固定产生良好效果。

Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone.

作者信息

Brzezinski Andrzej, Imbergamo Casey, Pfaff William, Tarapore Rae, Nasra Matthew, Simon Michael, Gatt Charles

机构信息

Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, U.S.A.

MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 11;4(3):e907-e914. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.01.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model.

METHODS

Twenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees were used in this study. Specimens were randomly distributed among 3 groups: (1) native meniscus groups, (2) interference fixation, and (3) transosseous suture fixation. In each group, the posterior segments of the tested medial menisci were gripped with the freeze clamps and fixed to the tensile testing machine. Samples were preconditioned, followed by cyclic tension-relaxation for 1000 cycles between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz and finally pulled to failure at a rate of 0.55 mm/s. The cyclic elongation, stiffness to failure, mode, and ultimate load to failure were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the interference fixation (169.71 ± 71.98 N) and transosseous suture fixation (222.73 ± 72.40 N) groups ( = .118), both were significantly less than that of the native meniscus (405.46 ± 95.62) ( < .001). Interference fixation displayed cyclic elongation (1.04 ± 0.71 mm) and stiffness (69.10 ± 25.8 N/mm) that were not significantly different from the native meniscus tissue (0.78 ± 0.53 mm and 83.1 ±26.28 N/mm) ( = .359 and  = .224), in comparison to transosseous suture fixation, which did show increased cyclic elongation (1.85 ± 1.44 mm) ( = .047) and decreased stiffness (34.72 ± 10.2 N/mm) ( < .001).

CONCLUSION

Interference fixation of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus has superior cyclic elongation and stiffness when compared to transosseous suture fixation. Interference fixation and the native meniscus model have a similar stiffness and cyclic elongation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The significance of our study is that using interference fixation for meniscal allograft transplantation has the potential to reduce short term surgical failures as well as long term complication rates.

摘要

目的

使用猪模型比较内侧半月板后角两种不同固定技术(干涉骨栓固定与经骨缝线固定)的生物力学特性。

方法

本研究使用了26对匹配的新鲜冷冻幼年家猪膝关节标本。标本随机分为3组:(1)正常半月板组,(2)干涉固定组,(3)经骨缝线固定组。在每组中,用冷冻夹夹住测试内侧半月板的后段并固定到拉伸试验机上。对样本进行预处理,然后在0.5Hz频率下于10至30N之间进行1000次循环张力-松弛,最后以0.55mm/s的速率拉伸至破坏。记录循环伸长、破坏刚度、破坏模式和极限破坏载荷。

结果

干涉固定组(169.71±71.98N)和经骨缝线固定组(222.73±72.40N)的极限破坏载荷无显著差异(P = 0.118),两者均显著低于正常半月板组(405.46±95.62)(P < 0.001)。干涉固定组的循环伸长(1.04±0.71mm)和刚度(69.10±25.8N/mm)与正常半月板组织(0.78±0.53mm和83.1±26.28N/mm)无显著差异(P = 0.359和P = 0.224),相比之下,经骨缝线固定组的循环伸长增加(1.85±1.44mm)(P = 0.047),刚度降低(34.72±10.2N/mm)(P < 0.001)。

结论

与经骨缝线固定相比,内侧半月板后角的干涉固定具有更好的循环伸长和刚度。干涉固定与正常半月板模型具有相似的刚度和循环伸长。

临床意义

我们研究的意义在于,在半月板同种异体移植中使用干涉固定有可能降低短期手术失败率以及长期并发症发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca24/9210386/100ff1df36db/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验