School of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):1251. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13587-x.
Previous evidence suggests that school garden-based programmes (SGBP) may be a promising yet cost-effective intervention to improve children's knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on healthy eating. This review aimed to summarise and evaluate the evidence available on the impacts of SGBP in addressing diet and nutrition-related KAP among school-aged children.
Five databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and Scopus were searched until February 2021. Randomised, non-randomised controlled and pre-post intervention studies investigating the impacts of SGBP on at least one of the outcomes of interest including diet and nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes towards fruits and vegetables (F&V), food diversity and dietary practice among school-aged children were included. Study selection and data extraction were performed by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by the other two reviewers in accordance with PRISMA guideline. Quality appraisal for studies included was assessed using American Dietetic Association Quality Criteria Checklist.
A total of 10,836 records were identified, and 35 studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. This includes 25,726 students from 341 schools and 8 nurseries from 12 countries. Intervention duration ranged from 6 weeks to 4 years with 18 studies involving a varied degree of parental participation. SGBP, which majorly includes school gardening activities, cooking lessons and nutrition education, demonstrated beneficial effects on children's nutritional knowledge, their attitudes and acceptability towards fruits and vegetables and children's dietary practices including the actual F&V consumption and dietary diversity. However, the impacts of SGBP on such outcomes were highly influenced by various social and environmental factors including the activities/components and duration of the intervention, parental involvement, sample size, and the age of children when interventions were first introduced.
These findings suggest that SGBP may be effective in promoting children's nutritional knowledge, attitudes and acceptability towards vegetables, however, the impacts may vary by the type, the extent, and the length of the programmes, and other factors such as parent involvement. Future SGBP is suggested to implement using a combined multidisciplinary approach targeting the children, parents, and community to effectively promote healthy eating among the children and prevent childhood obesity.
先前的证据表明,校园种植计划(SGBP)可能是一种有前途且具有成本效益的干预措施,可以提高儿童关于健康饮食的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。本综述旨在总结和评估现有关于 SGBP 对改善学龄儿童饮食和营养相关 KAP 的影响的证据。
检索了包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Scopus 在内的五个数据库,检索时间截至 2021 年 2 月。纳入了随机、非随机对照和干预前后研究,这些研究调查了 SGBP 对至少一个感兴趣的结果的影响,包括饮食和营养相关知识、对水果和蔬菜(F&V)的态度、食物多样性和学龄儿童的饮食实践。一名评审员进行了研究选择和数据提取,并由另外两名评审员根据 PRISMA 指南检查准确性。使用美国饮食协会质量标准检查表对纳入研究进行质量评估。
共确定了 10836 条记录,纳入了 35 项符合纳入和排除标准的研究。这包括来自 12 个国家的 341 所学校和 8 所幼儿园的 25726 名学生。干预持续时间从 6 周到 4 年不等,有 18 项研究涉及不同程度的家长参与。SGBP 主要包括学校园艺活动、烹饪课程和营养教育,对儿童的营养知识、他们对水果和蔬菜的态度和接受程度以及儿童的饮食实践(包括实际的 F&V 消费和饮食多样性)产生了有益的影响。然而,SGBP 对这些结果的影响受到各种社会和环境因素的极大影响,包括干预的活动/组成部分和持续时间、家长参与度、样本量以及干预首次引入时儿童的年龄。
这些发现表明,SGBP 可能有助于提高儿童的营养知识、对蔬菜的态度和接受程度,但是,影响可能因计划的类型、程度和长度以及家长参与等其他因素而有所不同。建议未来的 SGBP 采用针对儿童、家长和社区的多学科综合方法实施,以有效促进儿童健康饮食,预防儿童肥胖。