U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research & Development/Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment/Public Health and Integrated Toxicology Division, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 15;449:116136. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2022.116136. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Data demonstrate numerous per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), however, additional work is needed to characterize PFAS activity on PPAR gamma (PPARγ) and other nuclear receptors. We utilized in vitro assays with either human or rat PPARα or PPARγ ligand binding domains to evaluate 16 PFAS (HFPO-DA, HFPO-DA-AS, NBP2, PFMOAA, PFHxA, PFOA, PFNA, PFDA, PFOS, PFBS, PFHxS, PFOSA, EtPFOSA, and 4:2, 6:2 and 8:2 FTOH), 3 endogenous fatty acids (oleic, linoleic, and octanoic), and 3 pharmaceuticals (WY14643, clofibrate, and the metabolite clofibric acid). We also tested chemicals for human estrogen receptor (hER) transcriptional activation. Nearly all compounds activated both PPARα and PPARγ in both human and rat ligand binding domain assays, except for the FTOH compounds and PFOSA. Receptor activation and relative potencies were evaluated based on effect concentration 20% (EC), top percent of max fold induction (pmax), and area under the curve (AUC). HFPO-DA and HFPO-DA-AS were the most potent (lowest EC, highest pmax and AUC) of all PFAS in rat and human PPARα assays, being slightly less potent than oleic and linoleic acid, while NBP2 was the most potent in rat and human PPARγ assays. Only PFHxS, 8:2 and 6:2 FTOH exhibited hER agonism >20% pmax. In vitro measures of human and rat PPARα and PPARγ activity did not correlate with oral doses or serum concentrations of PFAS that induced increases in male rat liver weight from the National Toxicology Program 28-d toxicity studies. Data indicate that both PPARα and PPARγ activation may be molecular initiating events that contribute to the in vivo effects observed for many PFAS.
数据表明,许多全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 能激活过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α (PPARα),但仍需要更多的工作来描述 PFAS 对 PPARγ (PPARγ) 和其他核受体的活性。我们利用人或大鼠 PPARα 或 PPARγ 配体结合域的体外测定法,评估了 16 种 PFAS(HFPO-DA、HFPO-DA-AS、NBP2、PFMOAA、PFHxA、PFOA、PFNA、PFDA、PFOS、PFBS、PFHxS、PFOSA、EtPFOSA 和 4:2、6:2 和 8:2 FTOH)、3 种内源性脂肪酸(油酸、亚油酸和辛酸)和 3 种药物(WY14643、氯贝丁酯和代谢物氯贝酸)。我们还测试了这些化学品对人雌激素受体 (hER) 转录激活的影响。除了 FTOH 化合物和 PFOSA 之外,几乎所有化合物在人源和大鼠配体结合域测定中均能同时激活 PPARα 和 PPARγ。受体激活和相对效力是根据效应浓度 20% (EC)、最大诱导倍数的前百分率 (pmax) 和曲线下面积 (AUC) 来评估的。HFPO-DA 和 HFPO-DA-AS 是所有 PFAS 中在大鼠和人 PPARα 测定中最有效的(EC 最低、pmax 和 AUC 最高),其效力略低于油酸和亚油酸,而 NBP2 是在大鼠和人 PPARγ 测定中最有效的。只有 PFHxS、8:2 和 6:2 FTOH 表现出 >20% pmax 的 hER 激动作用。人源和大鼠源 PPARα 和 PPARγ 活性的体外测量与引起雄性大鼠肝脏重量增加的 NTP 28 天毒性研究中的口服剂量或血清浓度没有相关性。数据表明,PPARα 和 PPARγ 的激活可能是分子起始事件,导致许多 PFAS 观察到的体内效应。