Ingvarsson Sara, Hasson Henna, Augustsson Hanna, Nilsen Per, von Thiele Schwarz Ulrica, Sandaker Ingunn
Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, SE, Sweden.
Unit for Implementation and Evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm Region, 171 29, Stockholm, SE, Sweden.
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 25;3(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00320-3.
There is a lack of knowledge about management strategies being used to de-implement low-value care (LVC). Furthermore, it is not clear from the current literature what mechanisms are involved in such strategies and how they can change physicians' behaviors. Understanding the mechanisms is important for determining a strategy's potential impact. Applied behavior analysis focuses on processes involved in increasing and decreasing behaviors. Therefore, the aim of this study is to understand what management strategies are being used to de-implement LVC and the possible mechanisms involved in those strategies, using concepts from applied behavior analysis.
We applied a qualitative study design using an inductive approach to understand what management strategies are in use and then employed applied behavior analysis concepts to deductively analyze the mechanisms involved in them.
We identified eight different management strategies intended to influence LVC. Five of the strategies were developed at a regional level and had the potential to influence physicians' LVC-related behaviors either by functioning as rules on which LVC to de-implement or by initiating local strategies in each health care center that in turn could influence LVC practices. The local strategies had a stronger potential for influencing de-implementation.
Both strategies at a systemic level (regional) and on a local level (health care centers) must be considered to influence LVC-related behaviors. Strategies at the center level have a specific opportunity to impact LVC-related behaviors because they can be tailored to specific circumstances, even though some of them probably were initiated as an effect of strategies on a regional level. Using applied behavior analysis to understand these circumstances can be helpful for tailoring strategies to reduce LVC use.
对于用于减少低价值医疗(LVC)的管理策略,人们了解不足。此外,从当前文献中尚不清楚这些策略涉及哪些机制以及它们如何改变医生的行为。理解这些机制对于确定策略的潜在影响很重要。应用行为分析关注行为增加和减少所涉及的过程。因此,本研究的目的是利用应用行为分析的概念,了解用于减少LVC的管理策略以及这些策略可能涉及的机制。
我们采用定性研究设计,运用归纳法来了解正在使用的管理策略,然后运用应用行为分析概念进行演绎分析,以探究其中涉及的机制。
我们确定了旨在影响LVC的八种不同管理策略。其中五种策略是在区域层面制定的,有可能通过作为减少实施的LVC规则发挥作用,或者通过在每个医疗保健中心启动当地策略来影响医生与LVC相关的行为,而这些当地策略反过来又可能影响LVC实践。当地策略在影响减少实施方面具有更强的潜力。
为了影响与LVC相关的行为,必须同时考虑系统层面(区域)和地方层面(医疗保健中心)的策略。中心层面的策略有特定机会影响与LVC相关的行为,因为它们可以根据具体情况进行调整,尽管其中一些可能是作为区域层面策略的结果而启动的。运用应用行为分析来理解这些情况有助于调整策略以减少LVC的使用。