Siegman A W, Dembroski T M, Ringel N
Psychosom Med. 1987 Mar-Apr;49(2):127-35. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198703000-00003.
Previous research has linked various measures of hostility to the prevalence and incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD). The present study sought to determine whether some dimensions of hostility are differentially related to angiographically documented severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Specifically, a hostility measure that correlates with indices of neuroticism was compared with a hostility measure unrelated to neurotic tendencies. For patients 60 years and younger, results were significant, revealing that neurotic hostility was inversely associated with severity of CAD whereas nonneurotic hostility scores were positively related to extent of disease. Overall hostility scores derived from the combination of the two kinds of hostility measures were unrelated to CAD severity. Results suggest that the multidimensional nature of the hostility construct should be appreciated in attempts to associate measures of hostility with manifestations of CHD.
先前的研究已将各种敌意测量指标与冠心病(CHD)的患病率和发病率联系起来。本研究旨在确定某些敌意维度是否与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)血管造影记录的严重程度存在差异关联。具体而言,将一项与神经质指数相关的敌意测量指标与一项与神经质倾向无关的敌意测量指标进行了比较。对于60岁及以下的患者,结果具有显著性,表明神经质敌意与CAD严重程度呈负相关,而非神经质敌意得分与疾病范围呈正相关。从这两种敌意测量指标组合得出的总体敌意得分与CAD严重程度无关。结果表明,在试图将敌意测量指标与CHD表现联系起来时,应认识到敌意结构的多维度性质。