• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创 apical 脱垂修复术后的住院时间和 30 天术后并发症。

Length of Stay and 30-Day Postoperative Complications Following Minimally Invasive Apical Prolapse Repair.

机构信息

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery.

出版信息

Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Aug 1;28(8):539-546. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001205. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001205
PMID:35759772
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Data on the correlation between length of stay and postoperative complications following urogynecologic surgery are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to use a nationwide database to examine the correlation between length of stay and 30-day postoperative complications following minimally invasive apical prolapse repair.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included women in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2008 to 2018 who underwent laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy or uterosacral/sacrospinous repair and were discharged on postoperative day 0 (POD0) or 1 (POD1). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate.

RESULTS

Of the 28,269 women discharged home on POD0/1, 12,663 (45%) underwent laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy, and 15,606 (55%) underwent uterosacral/sacrospinous repair. Women discharged on POD0 were less likely to be White, less likely to have diabetes or hypertension, had lower mean body mass index, and were less likely to have undergone a hysterectomy ( P < 0.05 for all). Within 30 days of surgery, 7% had a postoperative complication, and 3% had a major complication. Women discharged on POD0 had a lower risk of any complication or any major complication. The most common complication, urinary tract infection, was lower in women discharged on POD0 (3% vs 4%, P < 0.01). Women discharged home on the same day had a higher risk of superficial surgical site infection after undergoing laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy (1.3% vs 0.5%, P < 0.01) and a higher risk of myocardial infarction/cardiac arrest after uterosacral/sacrospinous repair (0.2% vs 0%, P < 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing minimally invasive reconstructive apical repair, discharge on POD0 is correlated with similar or better (lower) 30-day postoperative complication rates compared with women discharged on POD1.

摘要

重要性

关于尿妇科手术后住院时间与术后并发症之间相关性的数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在利用全国性数据库,检查微创 apical prolapse 修复术后住院时间与 30 天术后并发症之间的相关性。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2008 年至 2018 年期间在美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库中接受腹腔镜/机器人 sacrocolpopexy 或 uterosacral/sacrospinous 修复术并在术后第 0 天(POD0)或第 1 天(POD1)出院的女性。主要结局为 30 天术后并发症发生率。

结果

在出院于 POD0/1 的 28269 名女性中,12663 名(45%)行腹腔镜/机器人 sacrocolpopexy,15606 名(55%)行 uterosacral/sacrospinous 修复术。出院于 POD0 的女性更不可能是白人,更不可能患有糖尿病或高血压,平均体重指数更低,且更不可能接受子宫切除术(所有 P<0.05)。术后 30 天内,7%的患者发生术后并发症,3%的患者发生重大并发症。出院于 POD0 的女性发生任何并发症或任何重大并发症的风险较低。最常见的并发症是尿路感染,出院于 POD0 的女性发生率较低(3%比 4%,P<0.01)。出院于同一天的女性行腹腔镜/机器人 sacrocolpopexy 后发生浅表手术部位感染的风险较高(1.3%比 0.5%,P<0.01),行 uterosacral/sacrospinous 修复术后发生心肌梗死/心搏骤停的风险较高(0.2%比 0%,P<0.04)。

结论

在接受微创重建 apical 修复的女性中,与出院于 POD1 的女性相比,POD0 出院与相似或更低(较低)的 30 天术后并发症发生率相关。

相似文献

1
Length of Stay and 30-Day Postoperative Complications Following Minimally Invasive Apical Prolapse Repair.微创 apical 脱垂修复术后的住院时间和 30 天术后并发症。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Aug 1;28(8):539-546. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001205. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
2
30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.脱垂手术后 30 天内意外的医疗保健遭遇:当日出院的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):482.e1-482.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1249. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
3
Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.经阴道骶骨阴道固定术和阴道顶端盆腔器官脱垂手术后的再入院和急诊就诊。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):552.e1-552.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
4
Postoperative void trial failure and same-day discharge following apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a retrospective matched case-control study.经阴道顶端盆腔器官脱垂手术后的排空试验失败和当天出院:一项回顾性匹配病例对照研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jun;34(6):1227-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05332-0. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂重建手术中的种族和民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):405.e1-405.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.实施尿失禁特定的术后加速康复(ERAS)路径。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):495.e1-495.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.女性盆底重建术后穹窿脱垂修补的长期再手术风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):306.e1-306.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.046. Epub 2022 May 30.
8
Effect of Body Mass Index on Complications After Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Prolapse Surgery.体重指数对阴道和腹腔镜顶端脱垂手术后并发症的影响。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug;35(8):1593-1598. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05837-w. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study.在加速康复(ERAS)时代,经阴道骶骨阴道固定术与阴道固有组织修补术治疗阴道顶端盆腔器官脱垂后的排尿功能:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1999-2004. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04992-8. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.阴道穹窿脱垂围手术期结局的全国当代分析:微创骶棘韧带固定术与非网片阴道手术的比较
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep/Oct;25(5):342-346. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000678.