Tayview Medical Practice Fife & NES Academic GP Fellow, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01781-0.
Complex multimorbidity, defined either as three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more different body systems or by the patients General Practitioner (GPs), is associated with various adverse outcomes. Understanding how GPs reach decisions for this complex group of patients is currently under-researched, with potential implications for health systems and service delivery. Schuttner and colleagues, through a qualitative approach, reported that internal factors of individuals (decisions tailored to patients; Primary Care Physician (PCP) consultation style; care planning towards an agreed goal of care), external factors within the environment or context of encounter (patient access to healthcare; organizational structures acting as barriers), and relationship-based factors (collaborative care planning; decisions within a dynamic patient clinician relationship) all influence care planning decisions. There are other important findings which have broader relevance to the literature such as the ongoing separation of physical and mental health which persist even within integrated care systems, GPs continue to prioritize continuity of care and that organizational barriers are reported as factors in clinician decision-making for patients. More broadly, the work has proved valuable in extending previously reported findings surrounding care coordination, and limitation of current guidelines for patients with complex multimorbidity. Work-load in general practice is increasing due to an ageing population, increasing prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, and transfer of clinical activities from secondary to primary care. The future for GPs is more complexity in the clinic room, understanding how GPs make decisions and how this can be supported is crucial for the sustainability for general practice.
复杂的多种并存疾病,定义为三种或以上影响三个或以上不同身体系统的慢性疾病,或由全科医生(GP)定义,与各种不良后果相关。目前,对于这一复杂患者群体,GP 如何做出决策的研究还不够深入,这可能对卫生系统和服务提供产生影响。Schuttner 及其同事通过定性方法报告称,个体的内部因素(针对患者的决策;初级保健医师(PCP)的咨询风格;针对商定的护理目标的护理计划)、环境或接触背景中的外部因素(患者获得医疗保健的机会;作为障碍的组织结构)和基于关系的因素(协作护理计划;在动态的医患关系中做出决策)都影响护理计划决策。还有其他一些重要的发现与文献有更广泛的相关性,例如,即使在整合的护理系统中,身体和心理健康的持续分离;GP 继续优先考虑护理的连续性;以及组织障碍被报告为临床医生为患者做出决策的因素。更广泛地说,这项工作在扩展围绕护理协调的先前报告的发现以及限制复杂多种并存疾病患者的当前指南方面证明是有价值的。由于人口老龄化、多种并存疾病和多药治疗的患病率增加以及临床活动从二级医疗向初级医疗的转移,普通科医生的工作量正在增加。未来,GP 在诊室中会面临更多的复杂性,了解 GP 如何做出决策以及如何提供支持对于普通科医生的可持续性至关重要。