• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding the processes behind the decisions - GPs and complex multimorbidity decision making.理解决策背后的过程——全科医生与复杂多重疾病的决策制定。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01781-0.
2
Factors affecting primary care physician decision-making for patients with complex multimorbidity: a qualitative interview study.影响基层医疗医生对患有复杂多种慢性病患者决策的因素:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 5;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01633-x.
3
Coordination of care for multimorbid patients from the perspective of general practitioners - a qualitative study.全科医生视角下的多病共存患者的协同护理 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 20;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1048-y.
4
GPs' mindlines on deprescribing antihypertensives in older patients with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in English general practice.全科医生在多重共病老年患者中停用降压药的思路:英国普通实践中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jun 24;71(708):e498-e507. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X714305. Print 2021 Jul.
5
Shared decision making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: a qualitative study.老年人合并多种疾病与全科医生之间的共同决策:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jul 28;72(721):e609-e618. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0529. Print 2022 Aug.
6
Improving medication management in multimorbidity: development of the MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MY COMRADE) intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel.改善多重疾病状态下的药物管理:运用行为改变轮开发多重疾病协作药物审查与决策制定(MY COMRADE)干预措施
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 24;10:132. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0322-1.
7
Problems and challenges in relation to the treatment of patients with multimorbidity: General practitioners' views and attitudes.与多病共存患者治疗相关的问题与挑战:全科医生的观点和态度
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015 Jun;33(2):121-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1041828. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
8
What to give the patient who has everything? A qualitative study of prescribing for multimorbidity in primary care.该给拥有一切的患者什么?一项关于基层医疗中多重疾病处方开具的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):e184-91. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684001.
9
General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.全科医生管理多病共存患者的策略:定性研究的系统评价和主题综合分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01197-8.
10
Understanding GPs' clinical reasoning processes involved in managing patients suffering from multimorbidity: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research.理解全科医生在管理患有多种疾病的患者时的临床推理过程:定性和定量研究的系统评价。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Sep;75(9):e14187. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14187. Epub 2021 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
State of the art: A roadmap for the national echocardiography team 2023.技术现状:2023年国家超声心动图团队路线图
Future Healthc J. 2024 Apr 19;11(1):100129. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2023-0037. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Greater temporal regularity of primary care visits was associated with reduced hospitalizations and mortality, even after controlling for continuity of care.初级保健就诊的时间更有规律与住院和死亡率降低相关,即使在控制了连续护理后也是如此。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):777. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09808-7.
3
The memory clinic and psychosocial intervention: Translating past promise into current practices.记忆诊所与心理社会干预:将过去的承诺转化为当前的实践。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 4;4:1052244. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1052244. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors affecting primary care physician decision-making for patients with complex multimorbidity: a qualitative interview study.影响基层医疗医生对患有复杂多种慢性病患者决策的因素:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 5;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01633-x.
2
Continuity of GP care for patients with dementia: impact on prescribing and the health of patients.全科医生对痴呆症患者的持续照护:对处方和患者健康的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):e91-e98. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0413. Print 2022 Feb.
3
Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway.一般实践中的连续性作为死亡率、急性住院和非工作时间护理使用的预测因素:挪威基于登记的观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):e84-e90. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340. Print 2022 Feb.
4
Easier Said Than Done: Healthcare Professionals' Barriers to the Provision of Patient-Centered Primary Care to Patients with Multimorbidity.说来容易做来难:医疗专业人员为多病共存患者提供以患者为中心的初级保健的障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6057. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116057.
5
Measuring the complexity of general practice consultations: a Delphi and cross-sectional study in English primary care.衡量全科医疗咨询的复杂性:一项针对英国初级医疗的德尔菲法和横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 May 27;71(707):e423-e431. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0486. Print 2021 Jun.
6
The rising complexity and burden of multimorbidity in a middle-income country.一个中等收入国家中日益复杂和沉重的多种疾病负担。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0243614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243614. eCollection 2020.
7
Effect Modification of Multimorbidity on the Association Between Regularity of General Practitioner Contacts and Potentially Avoidable Hospitalisations.多种疾病共存对全科医生就诊规律性与潜在可避免住院之间关联的效应修正
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1504-1515. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05699-0. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Tackling multimorbidity in primary care: is relational continuity the missing ingredient?应对基层医疗中的多种疾病并存问题:关系连续性是否是缺失的要素?
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):92-93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701201.
9
Comparison of the Complexity of Patients Seen by Different Medical Subspecialists in a Universal Health Care System.在全民医保体系下不同医学亚专科患者就诊复杂性的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4852.
10
SHERPA: a new model for clinical decision making in patients with multimorbidity.夏尔巴人:一种用于多病共存患者临床决策的新模型。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 20;392(10156):1397-1399. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31371-0.

理解决策背后的过程——全科医生与复杂多重疾病的决策制定。

Understanding the processes behind the decisions - GPs and complex multimorbidity decision making.

机构信息

Tayview Medical Practice Fife & NES Academic GP Fellow, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01781-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-022-01781-0
PMID:35761167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9238096/
Abstract

Complex multimorbidity, defined either as three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more different body systems or by the patients General Practitioner (GPs), is associated with various adverse outcomes. Understanding how GPs reach decisions for this complex group of patients is currently under-researched, with potential implications for health systems and service delivery. Schuttner and colleagues, through a qualitative approach, reported that internal factors of individuals (decisions tailored to patients; Primary Care Physician (PCP) consultation style; care planning towards an agreed goal of care), external factors within the environment or context of encounter (patient access to healthcare; organizational structures acting as barriers), and relationship-based factors (collaborative care planning; decisions within a dynamic patient clinician relationship) all influence care planning decisions. There are other important findings which have broader relevance to the literature such as the ongoing separation of physical and mental health which persist even within integrated care systems, GPs continue to prioritize continuity of care and that organizational barriers are reported as factors in clinician decision-making for patients. More broadly, the work has proved valuable in extending previously reported findings surrounding care coordination, and limitation of current guidelines for patients with complex multimorbidity. Work-load in general practice is increasing due to an ageing population, increasing prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, and transfer of clinical activities from secondary to primary care. The future for GPs is more complexity in the clinic room, understanding how GPs make decisions and how this can be supported is crucial for the sustainability for general practice.

摘要

复杂的多种并存疾病,定义为三种或以上影响三个或以上不同身体系统的慢性疾病,或由全科医生(GP)定义,与各种不良后果相关。目前,对于这一复杂患者群体,GP 如何做出决策的研究还不够深入,这可能对卫生系统和服务提供产生影响。Schuttner 及其同事通过定性方法报告称,个体的内部因素(针对患者的决策;初级保健医师(PCP)的咨询风格;针对商定的护理目标的护理计划)、环境或接触背景中的外部因素(患者获得医疗保健的机会;作为障碍的组织结构)和基于关系的因素(协作护理计划;在动态的医患关系中做出决策)都影响护理计划决策。还有其他一些重要的发现与文献有更广泛的相关性,例如,即使在整合的护理系统中,身体和心理健康的持续分离;GP 继续优先考虑护理的连续性;以及组织障碍被报告为临床医生为患者做出决策的因素。更广泛地说,这项工作在扩展围绕护理协调的先前报告的发现以及限制复杂多种并存疾病患者的当前指南方面证明是有价值的。由于人口老龄化、多种并存疾病和多药治疗的患病率增加以及临床活动从二级医疗向初级医疗的转移,普通科医生的工作量正在增加。未来,GP 在诊室中会面临更多的复杂性,了解 GP 如何做出决策以及如何提供支持对于普通科医生的可持续性至关重要。